Which one of the following was NOT the feature of the Home Rule movement in India ?

examrobotsa's picture
Q: 31 (CAPF/2015)

Which one of the following was NOT the feature of the Home Rule movement in India ?

question_subject: 

History

question_exam: 

CAPF

stats: 

0,71,34,71,18,10,6

keywords: 

{'home rule movement': [0, 0, 0, 3], 'india home': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'rule organisation': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'rule leagues': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'separate home': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'picketing': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13], 'boycott': [0, 0, 2, 2], 'discussion groups': [0, 0, 0, 1]}

The Home Rule movement in India was a significant movement during the Indian independence struggle, aiming to attain self-governance for India. The movement was characterized by various features that were instrumental in mobilizing public opinion and creating awareness.

Option 1, "Boycott and Picketing," was NOT a feature of the Home Rule movement. Boycott and picketing were strategies employed during other movements, such as the Swadeshi Movement, aimed at boycotting foreign goods and picketing shops that sold them. However, the Home Rule movement primarily focused on advocating for self-governance and did not include boycotts and picketing as its core methods.

Option 2, "Two separate Home-Rule Leagues rather than one All-India Home-Rule Organization," was indeed a feature of the Home Rule movement. The movement had two separate leagues, one formed by Bal Gangadhar Tilak in Maharashtra and the other by Annie Besant in Madras. These two leagues worked independently but shared the common goal of attaining self-rule for India.

Option 3, "Setting up of discussion groups and reading rooms," was also a feature of the Home Rule movement. One of the key strategies employed by the movement was to create awareness and educate people about their rights

Practice this on app