Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below the Lists :

List-I (Landmark Judgment)	List-II (Issue)
A. A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras	1. Whether Preventive Detention Act ultra vires the Fundamental Rights under the Constitution of India
B. K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Bombay	2. Whether the National Anthem must be played before movies in theatres
C. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India	3. Examining the power of suspension of sentence by the Governor under Article 161 of the Constitution of India
D. Shyam Narayan Chouksey vs. Union of India	4. Whether right to go abroad is included in right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India

The correct match is as follows:

• A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras (1950): The Supreme Court examined whether the Preventive Detention Act was ultra vires the Fundamental Rights, particularly Articles 19 and 21. It initially took a narrow view of "procedure established by law".
• K. M. Nanavati vs. State of Bombay (1961): This case dealt with the conflict between the Governor's power to suspend a sentence under Article 161 and the Supreme Court's power while a matter is sub-judice.
• Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India (1978): The court examined if the right to go abroad was part of Article 19(1)(a) or 19(1)(g); it famously ruled that it is part of "personal liberty" under Article 21.
• Shyam Narayan Chouksey vs. Union of India (2016): This case addressed whether the National Anthem must be played in cinema halls before movies.