Change set
Pick exam & year, then Go.
Question map
Not attempted
Correct
Incorrect
★
Bookmarked
Loading…
Q92
(CDS-I/2026)
Polity & Governance › Judiciary
Consider the following statements regarding the qualifications of a person for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India : 1. The person has to be, for at least five years, a Judge of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession. 2. The person has to be, for at least ten years, an advocate of a High Court or of two or more such Courts in succession. 3. The person is, in the opinion of the Chief Justice of India, a distinguised jurist. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Result
Your answer:
—
·
Correct:
C
Explanation
According to Article 124(3) of the Constitution of India, a person must be a citizen of India and fulfill any one of the following criteria to be appointed as a Supreme Court judge:
- Statement 1 is correct: The person must have been a Judge of a High Court (or two or more such courts in succession) for at least five years.
- Statement 2 is correct: The person must have been an advocate of a High Court (or two or more such courts in succession) for at least ten years.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: The Constitution states that a person can be appointed if they are a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President of India, not the Chief Justice of India.
Since statements 1 and 2 are correct and statement 3 is incorrect, the correct option is C.
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option.
Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
52%
got it right
✓ Thank you! We'll review this.