Change set

Pick exam & year, then Go.

Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked
Loading…
Q127 (CISF/2023) Polity & Governance › Fundamental Rights, DPSP & Fundamental Duties

In 2015, the Supreme Court of India struck down Section 66A of the Information and Technology Act, 2000 as being unconstitutional and violative of Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. In which case did the Supreme Court deliver this landmark judgment ?

Explanation

The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark case of Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The Court held that the provision was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, violating the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. It ruled that the section's language was so imprecise that it could be used to suppress even innocent speech, creating a "chilling effect" on free expression. The Court further noted that the restrictions imposed by Section 66A did not fall within the "reasonable restrictions" permitted under Article 19(2). In contrast, Suhas Katti v. State of Tamil Nadu was notable as the first case involving a conviction under the IT Act (specifically Section 67) for online harassment.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

CISF · 2025 · Q129 Relevance score: 5.22

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court declare Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 unconstitutional ?

CISF · 2026 · Q58 Relevance score: 3.36

Match List I with List II and select the answer using the code given below the Lists:

List I (Landmark Judgment) List II (Issue)
A. Golaknath case 1. Examining the validity of Section 66 A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 on the grounds of violating freedom of speech
B. Minerva Mills case 2. Validity of Mandal Commission Report and the extent of Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India
C. Indra Sawhney case 3. Whether the First, Fourth and Seventh Constitutional Amendments are parts of the Constitution of India by acquiescence
D. Shreya Singhal case 4. Validity of the Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act

Code:

A B C D
(a) 1 4 2 3
(b) 1 2 4 3
(c) 3 4 2 1
(d) 3 2 4 1

IAS · 2019 · Q45 Relevance score: 0.10

Consider the following statements : 1. The 44th Amendment to the Constitution of India introduced an Article placing the election of the Prime Minister beyond judicial review. 2. The Supreme Court of India struck down the 99th Amendment to the Constitution of India as being violative of the independence of judiciary. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

CDS-I · 2022 · Q78 Relevance score: -0.74

The issue, ‘whether Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is violative of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India’ was decided in which one of the following cases ?

CDS-I · 2011 · Q63 Relevance score: -1.72

The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India extends to