Option 1 is stating that both the assertion (A) and reason (R) are true, and furthermore, R is a correct explanation of A. Here, the assertion is that Asoka emphasized social harmony over religious devotion in his edicts; the reason posits that Asoka disseminated principles of equality rather than promoting any particular religion. These two statements are in alignment.

Option 2 also affirms the truth of both A and R, but disputes that R is accurate in elucidating why A is correct.

Option 3 claims that the assertion is accurate, but disputes the veracity of the reason given.

Option 4 posits that the assertion is untrue, but the reason is correct.

The correct answer is indeed option 1, because Asoka’s edicts emphasized harmony among people, which is a principle of equity, rather than promoting religious devotion, and this approach validates the assertion.