Question map
Assertion (A) : Malik Kafur conspired with Khizr Khan in murdering Ala-ud-din Khalji. Reason (R) : Malik Kafur was ambitious and tried to establish his influence as the supreme authority in the state.
Explanation
The assertion is false because Malik Kafur did not conspire with Khizr Khan to murder Ala-ud-din Khalji. In fact, Malik Kafur and Khizr Khan were bitter rivals. Kafur manipulated the ailing Sultan to turn against his own family, leading to the imprisonment of Khizr Khan and the execution of his uncle Alp Khan [t7]. Historical accounts by Barani suggest that Kafur's intrigues aimed at removing the legitimate heirs to clear his own path to power [t7]. The reason is true as Malik Kafur was indeed highly ambitious; upon Ala-ud-din's death in 1316, he bypassed the elder sons and installed a minor, Shihabuddin Omar, as a puppet monarch to establish himself as the supreme regent [c1][t4][t6]. His regency lasted only about thirty-five days before he was assassinated by the Sultan's former bodyguards [c1][t4].
Sources
- [1] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 10: Advent of Arabs and Turks > Ala-ud-din's Successors > p. 144
- [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malik_Kafur
- [3] http://pride.periyaruniversity.ac.in/SLM2024/M.A%20History/Semester_2_Core_4_History%20of%20Medivel%20India%20-%201206%20-%201707%20CE.pdf
SIMILAR QUESTIONS
Assertion(A): Daulatabad fortess was besieged by the Mughal forces in the year 1631 and it had to be surrendered to them. Reason (R) : Malik Ambar betrayed his Sultan during the siege of Daulatabad fortress by Mughal forces.
Assertion(A): Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutt threw bombs in the Legislative Assembly in 1929. Reason (R): They wanted to kill some members of the Legislative Assembly as a revenge for the death of Lala Lajpat Rai.
Assertion (A) : Muhammad bin Tughlaq left Delhi, and, for two years lived in a camp called Swarga-dwari. Reason (R) : At that time, Delhi was ravaged by a form of plague and many people died.