Question map
Statement I : India’s share of world manufacturing output steadily declined during the 19th and the 20th centuries. Statement I : There was no absolute decline in production in India during the colonial rule.
Explanation
Statement I is true as India's share of world manufacturing output plummeted from approximately 25% in 1750 to just 2% by 1900 [6]. This decline continued through the 19th and early 20th centuries due to the collapse of traditional handicraft and artisanal industries [2]. Statement II is false because colonial rule caused an absolute decline in traditional manufacturing production. The influx of cheap British machine-made goods, combined with discriminatory tariffs and the loss of patronage from Indian courts, led to the 'ruin' and 'virtual closing' of major sectors like textiles, iron, and pottery [5]. While modern large-scale industries like cotton and jute mills emerged in the mid-19th century, their slow growth could not compensate for the massive absolute displacement and destruction of the indigenous industrial base [4].
Sources
- [1] https://www.lse.ac.uk/Economic-History/Assets/Documents/Research/GEHN/GEHNConferences/conf7/Conf7-Williamson.pdf
- [6] Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 11: Economic Impact of the British Rule > Ruin of Artisans and Craftsmen > p. 183
- [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De-industrialisation_of_India
- [3] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 6: Indian Economy [1947 – 2014] > 6.1 Impact of British Rule on Indian Economy > p. 202
- [5] Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: The Colonial Era in India > LET'S EXPLORE > p. 100
- [4] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 28: Economic Impact of British Rule in India > View > p. 543