Current set CDS-II · 2012 Q7

Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked

Loading…

Q7 (CDS-II/2012) International Relations & Global Affairs › India's Bilateral & Regional Relations › India's Bilateral & Regional Relations

Statement I ; India supports the development and use of the Chabahar Port in Iran. Statement II : India does not subscribe to Western sanction on energy trade with Iran.

A

Both the statements are individually true and statement II is the correct explanation of statement I

B

Both the statements are individually true but statement II is not the correct explanation of statement I

C

Statement I is true but statement II is false

D

Statement I is false but statement II is true

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

Statement I : Dadabhai Naoroji argued that what was being drained out was ‘potential surplus’ that could generate more economic development in India if invested in India Statement I : Imperialists believed that India was brought into the large capitalist world market and that was in itself a progress towards modernization

Statement I: India used the Minimum Credible Deterrent argument to develop its nuclcar weapon system arguing that it had such a threat from China. Pakistan in turn used the same argument against India when it developed its own nuclear weapons. Statement I : The Minimum Credible Deterrent refers to a notion according to which nuclcar weapons become necessary for a country when it has a clear nuclcar threat-

Statement I: In the 19th century, India was the largest British colony. Statement I : India became a big market for British manufactured goods and a field of investment for foreign capital in the 19th century.

Statement I : The principle of equality before the law is not applicable to the President of India. Statement II : The President of India enjoys some special privileges under the Constitution of India.

Statement I: The private trade of the East India Company’s officials in the 18 century had flowered with the indirect patronage of the authorities of the Company. Statement II : The extra-legal power enjoyed by the foreign merchants and the duty-free nature of their private trade virtually edged the indigenous merchants out of competition.