Statement I : In north-western India, the Civil Disobedience Movement took a mass character under the leadership of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan. Statement II : The Nehru Report (1928) had argued that the next immediate step for India must be Dominion Status.

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: 3 (CDS-I/2011)

Statement I : In north-western India, the Civil Disobedience Movement took a mass character under the leadership of Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan.
Statement II : The Nehru Report (1928) had argued that the next immediate step for India must be Dominion Status.

question_subject: 

History

question_exam: 

CDS-I

stats: 

0,45,21,9,45,8,4

keywords: 

{'nehru report': [0, 0, 0, 2], 'khan abdul ghaffar khan': [1, 0, 3, 3], 'western india': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'civil disobedience movement': [5, 1, 3, 6], 'dominion status': [0, 1, 2, 4], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13]}

Option 1: Both the statements are individually true and statement II is the correct explanation of statement I.

This option suggests that both statements are true, and statement II provides the correct explanation for statement I. However, statement I talks about the Civil Disobedience Movement in north-western India being led by Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, while statement II discusses the Nehru Report`s argument for Dominion Status. There is no direct connection or explanation between the two statements, making option 1 incorrect.

Option 2: Both the statements are individually true but statement II is not the correct explanation of statement I.

This option suggests that both statements are true, but statement II does not provide the correct explanation for statement I. This option is correct because even though both statements are true, there is no direct connection or explanation between the two.

Option 3: Statement I is true but statement II is false.

This option suggests that only statement I is true, while statement II is false. However, both statements are generally accepted as true, making option 3 incorrect.

Option 4: Statement I is false but statement II is true.

This option suggests that statement I is false, but statement II is true. However, statement I is supported by historical evidence, making option