Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India. Statement I : The Zamindars often received the support of the peasantry in a large number of agrarian uprisings in North India in the seventeenth century.

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: 52 (CDS-II/2016)

Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India.
Statement I : The Zamindars often received the support of the peasantry in a large number of agrarian uprisings in North India in the seventeenth century.

question_subject: 

History

question_exam: 

CDS-II

stats: 

0,23,41,15,11,27,11

keywords: 

{'zamindars': [0, 0, 1, 0], 'mughal india': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'agrarian uprisings': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'peasantry': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'exploitative class': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'seventeenth century': [0, 0, 0, 2]}

Option 1: Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.

This means that both statement I and statement II are true, and statement II provides the correct explanation for statement I. However, this is not the case as statement II does not provide any explanation for statement I. It simply provides additional information that supports statement I.

Option 2: Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.

This is the correct option. Both statement I and statement II are true, but statement II does not explain or provide a reason for statement I. Instead, it adds more information that supports statement I.

Option 3: Statement I is true but Statement II is false.

This option is incorrect. Both statement I and statement II are true.

Option 4: Statement I is false but Statement II is true.

This option is incorrect. Statement I is true, as the Zamindars were indeed an exploitative class in Mughal India. Statement II is also true, as the Zamindars did receive support from the peasantry in various agrarian uprisings.

In conclusion, option 2 is the correct answer as it accurately states that both statement I and statement II are true, but statement