The correct answer in this case is option 3. This statement is incorrect because the Directive Principles of State Policy do not have precedence over the Fundamental Rights. In fact, in case of conflict between the two, the Fundamental Rights take precedence over the Directive Principles.

Option 1 is correct. The State is expected to follow the Directive Principles both in the administration of the country and in the making of laws. These principles provide guidance to the government in effectively governing the country.

Option 2 is correct. The Directive Principles of State Policy embody the objectives and goals that the State aims to achieve under the republican Constitution. These principles serve as a framework for ensuring social, economic, and political justice in the country.

Option 4 is correct. The Directive Principles of State Policy are not enforceable in the Courts. Unlike Fundamental Rights, which are justiciable and can be enforced through legal remedies, the Directive Principles are non-justiciable in nature. However, these principles act as moral and political obligations for the government in formulating policies and laws.

Overall, the Directive Principles of State Policy provide a vision and roadmap for the government to work towards the welfare and development of the country, but they do not hold precedence over the Fundamental Rights.