Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. The Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme was launched during 1996-97 to provide loan assistance to poor farmers. 2. The Command Area Development Programme was launched in 1974-75 for the development of water-use efficiency. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
**Statement 1 is incorrect.** The Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme (AIBP) was launched during 1996-97 as a Central Assistance programme for accelerating the implementation of large projects which were beyond the resource capability of the States.[1] While Rs. 500 crore was released as central loan assistance to the States during 1996-97[2], the programme's primary objective was not to provide loan assistance to poor farmers but to accelerate large irrigation projects.
**Statement 2 is correct.** The Command Area Development Programme was launched in 1974β75 with the set objectives of improving the utilisation of created irrigation potential and optimising agriculture production and productivity from irrigated agriculture[3], which essentially relates to improving water-use efficiency in command areas. The programme aimed to optimize the use of irrigation infrastructure already created.
Therefore, only Statement 2 is correct, making option B the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://cag.gov.in/uploads/download_audit_report/2018/Report_No_22_of_2018_Accelerated_Irrigation_Benefits_Programme_Ministry_of_Water_Resources_River_Development.pdf
- [2] https://www.indiabudget.gov.in/budget_archive/es97-98/chap84.pdf
- [3] Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT > p. 23
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Compound Statement Trap'. Statement 1 mixes a correct fact (1996-97 launch) with a subtle lie (beneficiary is the State, not poor farmers). Statement 2 is a direct lift from standard Geography textbooks (Majid Husain). Success requires distinguishing between 'Infrastructure Financing' (loans to Govt) and 'Welfare' (loans to individuals).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was the Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme (AIBP) in India launched in 1996β97?
- Statement 2: Was the Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme (AIBP) in India launched to provide loan assistance to poor farmers?
- Statement 3: Was the Command Area Development Programme (CADP) in India launched in 1974β75?
- Statement 4: Is the stated objective of the Command Area Development Programme (CADP) in India to improve water-use efficiency in irrigated command areas?
- Direct statement in an official CAG report that AIBP was launched in 1996-97.
- Context specifies it was a Central Assistance programme started in that year.
- Government budget document explicitly states the AIBP was launched in 1996-97.
- Mentions central loan assistance released in 1996-97, confirming launch-year activity.
- UN-hosted document reiterates that the Central Government launched AIBP in 1996-97.
- Provides supporting international-source corroboration of the launch year.
Explicitly names the "Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme" as a recognized government irrigation initiative, showing AIBP is part of the modern suite of irrigation schemes.
A student could use this to search program lists or timelines of government irrigation schemes to locate AIBP's launch year (knowing it exists and is linked to PMKSY-era policy discussions helps target sources).
Shows a pattern of government irrigation/watershed programmes being created and restructured across decades, with a notable policy shift to watershed implementation from April 1995.
A student could infer the mid-1990s were an active policy period and therefore check whether AIBP fits into this mid-90s wave of initiatives (making 1996β97 plausible to verify).
Gives an example of an irrigation-related programme (Command Area Development) launched earlier (1974β75) and later restructured (2004), indicating programmes often have launch and later reorganisation dates.
A student could apply this pattern (initial launch then later restructuring) to AIBP to look for its original launch date and any later reorganisation records to confirm timing.
References government allocations and programme structuring for water-related schemes (e.g., ARWSP earmarking), illustrating that irrigation/water programmes have documented administrative changes and budgetary notes.
Knowing such programmes are documented in budget/administrative notes, a student could examine mid-1990s budget documents or ministry records to find a formal launch date for AIBP.
Provides historical context that irrigation policy in India evolved over long periods, implying programme launches are part of documented policy timelines.
A student could use this historical-timeline approach to place AIBP within the broader chronology of irrigation initiatives and check if 1996β97 aligns with known waves of programme launches.
- Explicitly states the AIBP was launched in 1996-97 to provide loan assistance to poor farmers.
- Directly matches the claim's wording about providing loan assistance to poor farmers.
- States the AIBP was launched in 1996-97 and that Rs. 500 crore was released as central loan assistance.
- Indicates the loan assistance was provided to States (central loan assistance), not directly to poor farmers.
- Describes AIBP as a 'Central Assistance programme' launched to accelerate implementation of large irrigation projects beyond States' resource capability.
- Shows the programme's target was project completion and state-level support, not direct loans to poor farmers.
Explicitly states the Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme (AIBP) focuses on extending loan assistance to the States for faster completion of major and medium irrigation projects.
A student could contrast 'loan assistance to States for projects' with schemes that give credit directly to farmers (e.g., KCC) to test whether AIBP targeted poor farmers or state projects.
Describes a pattern in irrigation programmes: financial assistance is provided to state governments (on a 50:50 basis) for construction and command-area development activities.
Use this pattern to infer that irrigation-focused programmes commonly fund state-level infrastructure rather than direct farmer loans, making direct farmer loan intent for AIBP less likely.
Explains that small and marginal farmers often lack access to credit and depend on others' tube-wells, highlighting a distinct category of schemes aimed specifically at farmer credit.
Compare the described farmer-credit needs with the AIBP description (state project loans) to assess if AIBP matches typical farmer-credit interventions.
Lists farmer-focused credit measures (loan moratorium, interest subvention, additional Kisan Credit Cards) as examples of direct assistance to farmers.
A student could use these examples as a checklist of direct farmer loan measures and see that AIBP's stated loan assistance to States differs from these direct measures.
Notes institutional steps (Grameen banks, cooperative societies, Kisan Credit Card) that provide loan facilities directly to farmers, illustrating the typical mechanisms for farmer-targeted credit.
Contrast these farmer-directed mechanisms with AIBP's project/state-focused financing to judge whether AIBP was intended as direct loan assistance to poor farmers.
- Explicitly states 'The Command Area Development Programme was launched in 1974β75'.
- Describes programme scope and later restructuring, tying the launch date to the programme's origin.
- Notes that Command Area Development was introduced in the Indira Gandhi Canal Command Area in 1974, supporting the 1974β75 launch timeframe.
- Provides a specific early project (Indira Gandhi Canal) consistent with a 1974 start.
- Explicitly states CADP objectives: improve utilisation of created irrigation potential and optimise production/productivity from irrigated agriculture β goals aligned with better water use.
- Mentions programme focus on command areas of major and medium irrigation projects, i.e., the irrigated areas where water-use efficiency is targeted.
- Emphasises ecological sustainability in command areas and lists strict implementation of water management policy as a key requirement β directly links command-area programmes to water management/efficiency.
- Frames several sustainability measures around restoring ecological balance via water management, implying efficiency and reduced wastage are programme aims.
- Identifies water wastage and water-logging in canal command areas and calls for judicious/scientific development of irrigation β supporting the need for improving water-use efficiency in command areas.
- Links problems in command areas to the rationale for programmes that optimise irrigation use.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap. Statement 1 is the killerβit baits you with the correct year but swaps the beneficiary. Source: Majid Husain (Ch 15) covers CADP; AIBP is standard Economic Survey/Yearbook data.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Evolution of Indian Irrigation Policy (Sectoral approach vs. Watershed approach).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Water Timeline': DPAP (1973-74), CADP (1974-75), DDP (1977-78), IWDP (1989-90), RIDF (1995-96), AIBP (1996-97). Know who gets the money (State vs. Farmer) for each.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Whenever a statement has two distinct parts (Date + Objective), treat them as separate True/False checks. 'Accelerated Irrigation' implies completing stalled big damsβpoor farmers don't build dams, States do. Thus, the loan must be for the State.
Several references list launch years for national irrigation/watershed schemes (DPAP, DDP, IWDP), showing importance of knowing programme start-dates when verifying claims about AIBP's start year.
UPSC often asks about origins/timelines of central schemes; mastering these launch years helps answer direct-date questions and distinguish contemporaneous policies. Study by making a timeline of major schemes and cross-linking to policy shifts (e.g., sectoral β watershed).
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > Desertification and Desert Development Programme > p. 50
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 3: The Drainage System of India > Government Strategy > p. 36
Command Area Development is an example of an irrigation programme with a clear launch date and later restructuring (1974β75; CADWM from 1 April 2004), illustrating how programmes evolve over timeβrelevant when assessing claims about programme origins versus later reforms.
Questions probe both initial launches and later rebrandings/restructurings; aspirants should note original launch dates and restructured names/years to avoid confusing a programme's origin with later changes. Use timeline charts and compare original vs. restructured titles.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT > p. 23
PMKSY's components list explicitly names the Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme, connecting AIBP to later umbrella programmes and showing where to look for official descriptions and roles.
Understanding which schemes are components of larger missions (like PMKSY) is high-yield for GS mains and prelims; it helps trace administrative responsibility, purpose, and any consolidation of schemes. Memorise components and their nodal ministries, and review official scheme documents for dates/changes.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 11: Irrigation in India > Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) > p. 369
Reference [6] links AIBP to PMKSY and mentions loan assistance, but specifies loans are extended to States for completion of irrigation projects rather than to individual poor farmers.
Understanding which agricultural/irrigation schemes target states (project financing) versus individual farmers (direct credit) is frequently tested in polity/economy and agriculture questions. Master this to correctly identify scheme beneficiaries, funding routes, and implementation bodies; compare scheme objectives directly from source descriptions and classify them in answer frameworks.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 11: Irrigation in India > Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY) > p. 369
References [1] and [3] document credit measures aimed directly at farmers (KCC, interest subvention, crop loan measures), showing the typical government channels for providing credit to farmers.
High-yield topic: questions often ask about agricultural credit, subsidy/interest support and schemes for farmers. Knowing instruments like KCC and interest subvention helps distinguish direct farmer-assistance programmes from infrastructure/project financing. Prepare by tabulating scheme purpose, beneficiary, implementing agency and finance flow.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 21: Sustainable Development and Climate Change > Part II: For Poor, including migrants and farmers > p. 620
- NCERT. (2022). Contemporary India II: Textbook in Geography for Class X (Revised ed.). NCERT. > Chapter 4: The Age of Industrialisation > TYPES OF FARMING > p. 88
References [2] and [4] describe IRDP and its model of subsidies plus bank loans to selected households, illustrating the archetype of programmes that provide loans/subsidies directly to poor farmers/households.
IRDP-style schemes are a recurring theme in governance and rural development questions; mastering their structure (subsidy proportions, bank lending role, beneficiary targeting) helps answer questions on poverty alleviation, rural credit and scheme evaluation. Study by comparing IRDP with contemporary schemes to spot continuities and differences.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IRDP) > p. 18
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Envisioning a New Socio-Economic Order > Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP), 1980β1999 > p. 120
The question asks about the launch date; reference [1] pairs the 1974β75 launch with clear objectives for CADP.
Understanding launch years and stated objectives of major central schemes is frequently tested in UPSC (static + contemporary context). It links to questions on irrigation policy, agricultural productivity, and program evaluation. Memorise scheme names, launch years, and core aims; use scheme timelines to answer comparative and cause-effect questions.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT > p. 23
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > Indira Gandhi Canal Command Area Development Programme > p. 24
RIDF (Rural Infrastructure Development Fund). Established in NABARD in 1995-96 (one year before AIBP). Like AIBP, it provides loans to State Governments for rural infrastructure, not directly to farmers. It is the 'sibling scheme' of that era.
Semantic Logic: 'Accelerated Irrigation Benefits' implies speeding up something that is lagging. In the Indian context, this refers to 'Major/Medium Irrigation Projects' (dams/canals) that are stuck. Major projects are built by the State, not individuals. Therefore, 'loan assistance to poor farmers' is structurally impossible for this specific program name.
Mains GS-3 (Water Resources): Use CADP as the starting point for the shift from 'Construction-centric' policy (1970s) to 'Management-centric' (CADWM 2004) to 'Integrated' (PMKSY 2015). It illustrates the failure of merely creating potential without ensuring 'last-mile' connectivity.