Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. The Executive Power of the Union of India is vested in the Prime Minister. 2. The Prime Minister is the ex officio Chairman of the Civil Services Board. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because both statements are incorrect.
The Constitution vests the executive power of the Union in the President, not the Prime Minister[3]. In reality, the President exercises these powers through the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister[3], but constitutionally, the executive power is formally vested in the President under Article 53.
Regarding the second statement, the Cabinet Secretary is the ex-officio Chairman of the Civil Services Board,[5] not the Prime Minister[4]. The Cabinet Secretary, as the administrative head of the Cabinet Secretariat, holds this position.
Therefore, since Statement 1 incorrectly attributes executive power to the Prime Minister instead of the President, and Statement 2 incorrectly identifies the Prime Minister as Chairman of the Civil Services Board instead of the Cabinet Secretary, neither statement is correct.
Sources- [1] Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > 2. Powers and Duties of the President > p. 209
- [2] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 200
- [3] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: EXECUTIVE > PARLIAMENTARY EXECUTIVE IN INDIA > p. 84
- [4] https://cabsec.gov.in/aboutus/functions/
- [5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_Secretary_(India)
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewStatement 1 is a fundamental Constitutional check (Article 53); if you miss this, you are out of the race. Statement 2 tests the hierarchy of the Permanent Executive vs. Political Executive. The strategy is to memorize the 'Ex-officio Chairmen' list for all major bodies (NITI, Zonal Councils, CSB, ISC).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Directly quotes Article 53: 'the executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President'.
- Explicitly identifies the President as the head of the 'executive power' of the Union.
- States Article 53 wording that the executive power of the Union shall be vested in the President.
- Clarifies that this power may be exercised by the President directly or through subordinate officers, reinforcing vesting in the President.
- Confirms the Constitution vests executive power of the Union formally in the President.
- Adds practical context that the President exercises these powers through the Council of Ministers, but the vesting remains with the President.
- Direct official wording stating who is ex‑officio Chairman of the Civil Services Board.
- Names the Cabinet Secretary (not the Prime Minister) as the ex‑officio Chairman, contradicting the statement.
- States the Cabinet Secretary is the ex‑officio head of the Civil Services Board.
- Shows the Cabinet Secretary (under the Prime Minister) holds that ex‑officio role, implying the Prime Minister is not the ex‑officio Chairman.
- Explicitly asserts that the Prime Minister is the ex‑officio Chairman of the Civil Services Board, directly supporting the statement.
- Represents a conflicting claim compared with official and other sources above.
Shows a precedent: the Vice‑President is explicitly the ex‑officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, illustrating that high constitutional offices can carry ex‑officio chairmanships.
A student could use this pattern to check whether statutes/rules establishing the Civil Services Board similarly name a high officeholder (e.g., the PM) as ex‑officio chair.
Another explicit example of an ex‑officio chairmanship (Chairman of Council of States) tied to a constitutional office, reinforcing the rule/pattern.
Use this rule to guide a search in Government rules for language 'ex‑officio Chairman' when examining the Civil Services Board's constitution.
Describes the Prime Minister's formal role as chairman of the Cabinet, showing the PM does serve as chairperson of important executive bodies.
A student can generalize that the PM is often designated chair of central executive bodies and so should check whether Government rules similarly designate the PM for the Civil Services Board.
Gives a concrete modern example where the Prime Minister is explicitly head of a body (Governing Council of NITI Aayog) and nominates ex‑officio members, showing how Government rules assign roles to the PM.
Compare the enabling rules/notifications of the Civil Services Board to the NITI Aayog/Governing Council instruments to see if the PM is named as ex‑officio chair.
Explains statutory/constitutional constraints and appointment/eligibility rules for chairmen of public service commissions, indicating that specific statutes govern who may hold such offices.
Suggests a student should consult the specific rules or notification that constitute the Civil Services Board to see if it prescribes the PM as ex‑officio chair or restricts who can be chairman.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter + Trap. Statement 1 is direct from Article 53 (Laxmikanth Ch: President). Statement 2 is a standard Administrative GK fact often confused with the PM's role.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The Union Executive. Specifically, the separation between the 'Head of State' (President), 'Head of Government' (PM), and 'Head of Civil Services' (Cabinet Secretary).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the Chairpersons: 1. NITI Aayog/NDC/Inter-State Council/NDMA -> PM. 2. Zonal Councils -> Home Minister. 3. Civil Services Board -> Cabinet Secretary. 4. Rajya Sabha -> Vice President. 5. Lok Sabha -> Speaker.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading about a body, ask: Is it a Constitutional body or a bureaucratic board? Boards dealing with service matters (CSB) are usually headed by the top bureaucrat (Cabinet Secretary), not the PM.
All core references cite or paraphrase Article 53 which explicitly vests the executive power of the Union in the President.
High-yield constitutional provision: frequently tested directly (who holds executive power) and indirectly (roles/powers of President). Connects to study of Articles 53–75. Master by memorising the Article text and its immediate implications for administration and rule-making.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > 2. Powers and Duties of the President > p. 209
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 200
Several references contrast formal vesting in the President with actual exercise through the Council of Ministers (Article 74 context).
Critical for UPSC: questions often ask about President's role in practice vs. theory, aid-and-advice doctrine, and collective responsibility. Learn by linking Articles 53, 74, 75 and landmark judicial interpretations; practise case-based questions to apply the distinction.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > Indian President compared with American President and English Crown. > p. 231
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: EXECUTIVE > PARLIAMENTARY EXECUTIVE IN INDIA > p. 84
References note that Article 53 allows the President to exercise executive power directly or via subordinate officers, clarifying constitutional mechanism of administration.
Useful for questions on administrative structure, delegation of executive authority, and distribution between Union and States. Study by mapping Articles that permit delegation and examples of subordinate agencies/officers.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > 200 ,yj' lndian Polity > p. 200
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 24: DISTRIBUTION OF LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE POWERS > Distribution of Execlltive Powers. > p. 381
Several references explicitly use 'ex‑officio' for presiding offices (e.g., Vice‑President as Chairman of Rajya Sabha) and for membership/appointments in bodies headed by the PM.
High‑yield for UPSC because many questions test which constitutional or statutory posts are held ex‑officio (who automatically occupies which chair). It connects to understanding institutional design and appointment rules. Expect direct factual questions and match‑the‑following items; revise lists and authoritative sources. Use tabulation (office → ex‑officio holder → basis) to memorise.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Chairman of Ra;ya Sabha > p. 233
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 6: Economic Planning in India > 6.14 Indian Economy > p. 144
References describe the PM as chair of the Cabinet/Council of Ministers and head of bodies like the NITI Aayog Governing Council.
Very relevant: UPSC frequently asks about the PM's formal and de facto powers, chairmanships, and institutional roles. Helps answer questions on allocation of business, chairing of councils, and executive leadership. Study constitutional text plus statutory rules/organisational charters to distinguish where PM is ex‑officio chair versus where chairmanship is separate.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > Special position of the Prime Minister in the Council of Ministers. > p. 229
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 6: Economic Planning in India > 6.14 Indian Economy > p. 144
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: EXECUTIVE > PRIME MINISTER AND COUNCIL OF MINISTERS > p. 90
The question concerns civil services governance; evidence includes the doctrine that civil servants hold office during the President's/ Governor's pleasure.
Important for answering questions on civil service appointments, removals and safeguards (Article 310 and related rules). UPSC often frames scenario‑based questions on tenure, removals, and exceptions to 'pleasure'. Focus on constitutional provisions, exceptions, and administrative rules governing services.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 74: Public Services > Tenure of Office (Doctrine of Pleasure) > p. 548
Since they asked about the Civil Services Board (Cabinet Secretary), the next logical question is about the 'Appointments Committee of the Cabinet' (ACC). The ACC is headed by the Prime Minister, but it decides based on recommendations often processed by the CSB/Establishment Officer.
Apply the 'Hierarchy Heuristic'. The Civil Services Board handles transfers and postings of bureaucrats. The Prime Minister is the political head of the country; he does not sit as the 'Chairman' of a bureaucratic 'Board'. That role fits the highest bureaucrat (Cabinet Secretary). Statement 1 is eliminated by basic Article 53 knowledge.
Connects to GS-2 'Role of Civil Services in a Democracy'. The Cabinet Secretary acting as head of the CSB represents the institutional integrity of the 'Permanent Executive', distinct from the 'Political Executive' (PM).