Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. India has ratified the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) of WTO. 2. TFA is a part of WTO's Bali Ministerial Package of 2013. 3. TFA came into force in January 2016. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A (statements 1 and 2 only).
**Statement 1 is correct:** India ratified the WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation (TFA) in April 2016[1], demonstrating India's commitment to simplifying trade procedures.
**Statement 2 is correct:** Text of the TFA was adopted by WTO members during 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference[2], making it part of the Bali Ministerial Package.
**Statement 3 is incorrect:** The TFA did not come into force in January 2016. The Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), negotiated at WTO, came into force on 22nd February 2017[4]. This was after two-thirds of WTO members had ratified the agreement. The confusion may arise because India ratified it in April 2016, but the global entry into force occurred only in February 2017.
Therefore, only statements 1 and 2 are correct, making option A the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/data/general-file-upload/2020-02/Economic%20Survey%202018-19-II.pdf
- [2] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT (TFA) of WTO > p. 545
- [3] https://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/data/general-file-upload/2021-01/Economic-Survey-2020-21-Volume-II.pdf
- [4] https://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/data/general-file-upload/2021-01/Economic-Survey-2020-21-Volume-II.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question demands you track the 'lifecycle' of a treaty, not just its definition. It combines static history (Bali 2013) with dynamic status updates (Ratification/Entry into Force). If a major treaty is in the news, you must know its three milestones: Adoption, Ratification, and Enforcement.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Has India ratified the World Trade Organization's Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA)?
- Statement 2: Is the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) part of the Bali Ministerial Package adopted at the 2013 WTO Bali Ministerial Conference?
- Statement 3: Did the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) enter into force in January 2016?
- Explicitly states that India ratified the WTO Agreement on Trade Facilitation.
- Provides the timing of ratification (April 2016) and subsequent actions indicating implementation steps.
- Notes the TFA came into force on 22nd February 2017, situating India's ratification timing relative to entry into force.
- States that India constituted a National Committee on Trade Facilitation (NCTF) in August 2016, supporting that India took formal steps after ratification.
The excerpt presents the specific claim ('India has ratified the TFA') as an exam-style true/false item alongside two factual points about the TFAβshowing this is a specific, checkable factual assertion often tested.
A student could treat this as a pointer to consult authoritative lists (WTO ratification/acceptance records) or recent government notifications to verify India's status.
Gives concrete background: the TFA text was adopted at the 2013 Bali Ministerial and came into force in 2016/2017βestablishing clear dates after which members could ratify/accept the Agreement.
Knowing the adoption and entry-into-force dates, a student can check post-2013/2016 government/WTO actions (notifications of ratification/acceptance) for India.
Shows precedent that India has joined/accepted plurilateral WTO agreements in the past (Information Technology Agreement accession in 1996).
Using this pattern, a student might infer Indiaβs willingness to join WTO instruments and therefore look for a formal accession/acceptance record for the TFA.
Describes the WTO as the institution that manages global trade rules and member decisionsβimplying ratification/acceptance records would be maintained by the WTO.
A student can extend this by checking the WTO's official list of members' notifications/acceptances for the TFA to confirm India's status.
- Explicitly states the text of the TFA was adopted by WTO members during the 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference
- Describes TFA in the context of WTO negotiations and adoption timing tied to Bali 2013
- Directly states the date the TFA entered into force, contradicting a January 2016 entry.
- Specifies the entry-into-force occurred when two-thirds of WTO members ratified, giving the exact date.
- Explicitly gives the entry-into-force date as 22nd February 2017, not January 2016.
- Presented in an official national document (Economic Survey) confirming the same date.
This source presents the exact claim (TFA came into force in January 2016) as one of several answer options in an exercise, showing that this date is a commonly stated assertion in study material.
A student could treat this as an example of a claimed date and then crossβcheck with primary WTO timelines or ratification counts to verify correctness.
This snippet explicitly states a different date: 'TFA came into force in 2017,' providing a contradicting date in the same topical literature.
A student could use the conflicting dates (2016 vs 2017) as a prompt to check official WTO entryβintoβforce criteria (e.g., required number/weight of ratifications) and the actual ratification timeline.
Mentions that activity levels (new disputes) in WTO varied across 2016 and 2017, giving temporal context around those years in WTO reporting.
A student could look up WTO annual reports for 2015β2017 to see when the TFA is referenced as in force and whether dispute or implementation activity increased after entry.
Gives a concrete WTO membership snapshot '164 members (as on 29 July 2016)', which is relevant because TFA entry depended on a certain number/combination of members' ratifications.
A student could compare the membership/ratification counts as of Jan 2016 and as of 2017 to judge whether the necessary threshold for entry was likely met in Jan 2016.
States foundational WTO facts (established 1995), reminding the student that agreements have formal entry procedures under WTO rules rather than automatic dates.
A student could use this to recall that entry into force depends on ratification/notification procedures and then verify the TFA's ratification milestone dates from WTO sources.
- [THE VERDICT]: Manageable Current Affairs. Stmt 2 is standard static (Bali 2013); Stmt 1 & 3 were headline news in the 12 months preceding the 2017 exam.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: WTO Ministerial Outcomes (Bali, Nairobi, Buenos Aires) and India's specific stance/actions within them.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Peace Clause (Bali), Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM), Nairobi Package (Export subsidies elimination), Fisheries Subsidies Agreement (Geneva 2022), and TRIPS Waiver.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not stop at 'What is TFA?'. You must map the Timeline: Adoption (2013) β India's Ratification (2016) β Global Entry into Force (2017).
Reference [2] describes the rationale for the TFA (reducing red tapism, simplifying and harmonising procedures) and notes the text was adopted at the 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference.
High-yield for UPSC: understanding what the TFA aims to achieve and where/when it was adopted helps answer questions on multilateral trade reforms and ministerial outcomes. Links to topics on trade policy, customs reform, and international negotiation outcomes; enables answers on βwhyβ and βhowβ trade facilitation matters for developing countries.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT (TFA) of WTO > p. 545
Reference [2] states the TFA 'came into force in 2017', highlighting the timeline from adoption to entry-into-force.
Timeline knowledge is often tested (adoption vs. entry-into-force vs. implementation). Useful for essay and prelims/sts where dates and sequence of WTO agreements are asked; connects to broader study of how international treaties become binding.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT (TFA) of WTO > p. 545
Reference [5] outlines WTO's role as the rule-setting body for global trade and notes decision-making practices.
Core conceptual background: UPSC frequently asks about the WTOβs functions, member dynamics, and negotiation processes. Mastering this helps contextualise agreements like the TFA and predict implementation/ratification challenges across members.
- Contemporary World Politics, Textbook in political science for Class XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: International Organisations > WTO > p. 57
Reference [2] links the TFA's text directly to adoption at the 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask which agreements were adopted at specific WTO ministerials. Mastering the adoption events helps answer timeline and multilateral-negotiation questions and connects to trade-policy developments.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT (TFA) of WTO > p. 545
Reference [2] connects the TFA to the Doha Round; reference [3] explains the Doha Round's origins and aims.
Important for mapping continuity in WTO negotiations β how issues from Doha led to later outcomes (like TFA). Useful for questions on evolution of multilateral trade agendas and negotiating bundles.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT (TFA) of WTO > p. 545
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 13: International Organizations > 13.12 WTO β Doha Development Agenda > p. 391
References describe ministerial conferences as venues for negotiations and adoption of WTO texts (e.g., Bali 2013) and that WTO agreements arise from member negotiations.
Core concept: UPSC often tests institutional processes (decision-making, ministerials). Understanding that ministerials adopt package agreements helps answer procedural and policy-history questions across international institutions.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT (TFA) of WTO > p. 545
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 13: International Organizations > The following are some of the important features regarding WTO > p. 378
Evidence explicitly links the TFA text to adoption at the 2013 Bali Ministerial Conference.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask where/when major WTO outcomes were adopted (ministerial conferences). Knowing Bali-2013 anchors timelines and links to broader WTO negotiation history; useful for questions on multilateral trade diplomacy and trade reform packages.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 18: International Economic Institutions > TRADE FACILITATION AGREEMENT (TFA) of WTO > p. 545
Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies (2022). Like TFA, this is the next major WTO accord. Watch its 'Entry into Force' condition (acceptance by 2/3rd members) and India's ratification status closely.
The 'Clean Date' Trap. Stmt 3 claims 'January 2016'. International treaties rarely enter into force on a perfect calendar start (Jan 1st) unless specified years in advance. They usually trigger X days after the Nth ratification (e.g., Feb 22, 2017). Be skeptical of 'clean' months like January in date-based statements.
GS-3 (Infrastructure/Logistics): TFA compliance is the legal backbone for India's 'National Logistics Policy' and 'PM Gati Shakti', aiming to reduce logistics costs from 14% of GDP to single digits.