Question map
What is/are the most likely advantages of implementing 'Goods and Services Tax (GST)' ? 1. It will replace multiple taxes collected by multiple authorities and will thus create a single market in India. 2. It will drastically reduce the 'Current Account Deficit' of India and will enable it to increase its foreign exchange reserves. 3. It will enormously increase the growth and size of economy of India and will enable it to overtake China in the near future. Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is option A (1 only).
GST was introduced on 1 July 2017 with the intention of having a 'One Nation One Tax' system and replaced multiple cascading taxes levied by the Central and State Governments.[1] GST created an un-fragmented unified national market for goods and services with common rules and administration procedures across the nation.[2] Therefore, statement 1 is correct.
Statement 2 is incorrect because GST is a domestic tax reform focused on indirect taxation and market unification. There is no evidence in the sources that GST implementation has drastically reduced India's Current Account Deficit or directly increased foreign exchange reserves. These macroeconomic indicators are influenced by trade balances, capital flows, and external factors rather than domestic tax reforms.
Statement 3 is also incorrect. While GST was expected to result in higher economic growth with GDP expected to rise by about 2%[3], and studies suggested GDP gains within a range of 0.9 to 1.7 per cent[4], these are modest improvements. There is no evidence that GST would "enormously" increase India's economy or enable it to overtake China in the near future—such claims are unrealistic and unsupported.
Sources- [1] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (GST) > p. 90
- [2] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > GST Compensation Cess > p. 177
- [3] Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > Box 5.3: GST: One Nation, One Tax, One Market > p. 83
- [4] https://www.ncaer.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/1371816570wp103.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Logic vs. Hype' question. Statement 1 is the textbook definition of GST found in NCERT. Statements 2 and 3 are extreme exaggerations ('drastically', 'enormously', 'overtake China'). The strategy is to trust the structural definition but reject the magical outcomes.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India replace multiple indirect taxes that were previously collected by multiple authorities?
- Statement 2: Has the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India created a single national market by harmonizing or unifying tax structures across states and authorities?
- Statement 3: Has the implementation of GST in India drastically reduced India's Current Account Deficit?
- Statement 4: Has the implementation of GST in India led to a significant increase in India's foreign exchange reserves?
- Statement 5: Has the implementation of GST in India enormously increased the growth rate and size of the Indian economy?
- Statement 6: Is the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in India expected to enable India to overtake China economically in the near future?
- Explicitly states GST was introduced as 'One Nation One Tax' and replaced a multiple number of cascading taxes levied by Central and State Governments.
- Directly links replacement of multiple taxes to the GST implementation date (1 July 2017).
- States that the 101st Constitutional Amendment introduced National GST from 1 July 2017.
- Explicitly says GST has replaced all indirect taxes levied on goods and services by Indian Central and State Governments.
- Describes GST as a single comprehensive indirect tax applicable nationwide.
- Says GST 'has amalgamated a large number of Central and State taxes' and 'has replaced large number of taxes on goods and services.'
- Explicitly asserts GST will create an 'un-fragmented unified national market' and introduce common rules and administration nationwide.
- States GST will produce a friendly tax structure over a common base and widen the tax base, indicating harmonization across authorities.
- Says laws, procedures and rates are standardised across the country and that GST 'created a common market'.
- Links standardisation to facilitation of free movement of goods/services and reduced cascading—core features of a unified market.
- Describes GST as a single comprehensive indirect tax operational nationwide that amalgamated many Central and State taxes.
- Notes one rate for one type of goods/service and replacement of many earlier taxes — direct evidence of unification/harmonization.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Directly reports that India has run a current account deficit almost uninterruptedly since 2000, indicating persistence of the deficit after GST implementation.
- Notes the CAD rose to 2.4% in 2022 due to an energy shock and then fell to around 1% in 2023 and 2024-H1 — changes attributed to terms-of-trade/energy prices, not to GST.
- Presents an analytical expectation that comprehensive GST could lead to gains in GDP and exports, which might affect trade balances in theory.
- This is a projection of potential export gains under GST, not observed post-implementation evidence that GST has drastically reduced the CAD.
Says GST reduces overall cost of production and makes Indian goods/services more competitive, and may raise GDP (~2%).
A student could infer that greater competitiveness could boost exports and/or reduce import demand, which—if large enough—would improve the trade balance and hence the CAD; check export/import time-series after GST.
States GST brings uniform tax rates and easier compliance, reducing compliance costs and uncertainty for businesses.
Lower compliance and transaction costs might increase domestic production and export supply; a student could compare export growth rates and manufacturing competitiveness before vs after GST.
Points out exclusions (e.g., electricity) and high rates/thresholds that can embed tax in costs and limit GST's revenue/competitiveness benefits.
This suggests GST's positive effect on trade could be partial; a student could examine sectors where input taxes remain embedded (power-intensive industries) to see if those sectors' trade performance changed post-GST.
Provides the decomposition: Current Account = balance of visibles (trade) + invisibles (services), showing CAD arises from trade/invisibles dynamics.
Use this to identify the channels (exports/imports of goods and services) through which GST-induced cost/competitiveness changes would have to operate to affect the CAD; then check those components empirically post-GST.
Contains an exam-style claim that GST 'will drastically reduce the Current Account Deficit'—this shows the hypothesis exists in textbooks as a potential advantage.
Treat this as a stated hypothesis to be tested: a student could treat it as a claim and seek time-series CAD data around GST implementation to confirm or refute it.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
This exam-style snippet lists as a purported advantage of GST that it 'will drastically reduce the Current Account Deficit and will enable it to increase its foreign exchange reserves' — giving a hypothesised causal link between a domestic tax reform and reserves.
A student could test this by checking whether CAD narrowed and net exports or export competitiveness improved after GST's 2017 rollout, and whether timing matches reserve increases.
Explains a concrete mechanism (RBI sterilisation and dollar purchases, aided by sluggish imports and capital controls) that has contributed to recent rises in forex reserves.
Compare the timing and magnitude of RBI interventions, import trends and capital controls around 2017+ to see if reserves rose due to these factors rather than GST.
Provides a long-run series and specific levels showing reserves rose substantially from $5.8bn (1991–92) to $407bn (Mar 2018) and $505.7bn (June 2020), illustrating that reserves have been rising over decades.
A student can map these yearly/reserve datapoints against the 2017 GST introduction to see whether a distinct inflection in the trend coincides with GST.
Gives a specific reserve level (US$ 583.94bn as on 5 Feb 2021) and describes reserve composition (FCAs, gold, SDRs), which shows what is being measured when claiming 'increase in reserves.'
Use these published reserve totals and composition before and after 2017 to determine if the increase is substantial and whether components suggest causes (e.g., capital inflows vs valuation effects).
Describes legal/investment instruments and RBI's role in managing reserves, highlighting that reserves change via foreign asset transactions and valuation/portfolio effects.
Investigate RBI balance-sheet operations (purchases/sales, asset valuation) post-GST to judge if reserve changes were managerial/market-driven rather than caused by GST altering trade flows.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Explicitly states GST has contributed significantly to India's economic growth and stability.
- Describes GST as simplifying compliance and reducing tax cascading, mechanisms that can increase economic efficiency and size.
- Provides quantitative estimates of growth-rate gains from GST (0.68–1.33%), giving a measured effect on growth.
- Notes improvements in returns to capital and factor allocation, indicating efficiency and size effects in the economy.
- Describes GST as 'a game changer' and 'a reform of the century,' language that implies a large/transformative impact.
- Frames the implementation as a remarkable achievement for a large federal country, supporting claims of substantial effect.
NCERT states GST standardised taxes, reduced production costs and says GDP is expected to rise by about 2% — an explicit textbook estimate of GST's macro effect.
A student could compare the textbook's +2% expectation with actual GDP growth rates for years before and after GST to judge whether GST produced an 'enormous' increase.
Describes mechanisms: GST increased tax base, improved compliance, seamless input tax credit and higher revenue efficiency — channels through which GST can raise government revenue and potentially GDP.
One could use these channels to check whether rising revenues or investment-friendly effects after GST correlate with higher GDP growth in national accounts.
Notes reduced compliance costs and uniform tax rates across India, which lower cost of doing business — a microeconomic pathway to higher investment and output.
Combine this with firm-level or sectoral output/investment data (pre- and post-GST) to test whether reduced compliance translated into higher production and growth.
Government used a 14% average annual growth of states' indirect tax collections (2012–2016) as a baseline for GST compensation — showing expectations about revenue continuity and growth trajectories.
A student could compare actual state indirect tax collections and overall fiscal balances after GST against that 14% baseline to assess revenue and growth impacts.
Textbook exercise lists 'enormously increase the growth and size of economy' as a claimed advantage of GST (presented as an assertion to evaluate) — indicating this is a hypothesised outcome taught for scrutiny.
Treat this as a hypothesis prompting empirical checks — e.g., compare GDP growth trends, investment rates, and competitiveness indicators before and after GST implementation.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
Defines GST as a single, destination-based consumption tax that amalgamated many central/state taxes and applies uniformly, implying removal of previous tax fragmentation.
A student could combine this with basic facts about how unified markets and lower compliance costs affect investment and growth to judge whether such structural reform could close large international GDP gaps.
States GST simplifies taxes, reduces cost of business and production, and notes an expected GDP rise of about 2% as a result.
Compare an estimated ~2% GDP uplift to the current India–China GDP gap (from external world GDP data) to assess whether GST-sized gains could be decisive in the near term.
Explains GST is a value-added tax with CGST/SGST/IGST structure and standardised laws, indicating administrative uniformity and clearer tax credits across states.
A student could infer how reduced cascading taxes and clearer input tax credit could improve manufacturing competitiveness and exports, then check if such competitiveness gains scale enough to overtake China.
Claims GST will create an un-fragmented national market, widen the tax base and simplify procedures, suggesting potential for higher formalisation and tax revenues.
Use this to reason that higher revenues and a unified market may support public investment and productivity growth; then compare likely magnitudes to the India–China economic gap using public data.
Contains a textbook multiple-choice suggestion (as an option) that GST will 'enormously increase' India's growth and 'enable it to overtake China', illustrating that some sources present this as a claimed possible effect (but not proven).
Treat this as an example of an asserted extreme outcome; a student could test plausibility by estimating how large growth increases would need to be to overtake China and whether GST-related mechanisms could plausibly deliver that magnitude.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Solvable purely by eliminating extreme adjectives ('drastically', 'enormously'). Source: NCERT Macroeconomics Box 5.3.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Indirect Tax Reforms & Fiscal Federalism (GST Architecture).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize GST Council structure (Art 279A, Centre 1/3 vote, States 2/3 vote, 3/4 majority needed); Exclusions (Alcohol for human consumption, 5 Petroleum products); Composition Scheme limit (₹1.5 Cr turnover); e-Way Bill threshold (>₹50k).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying government schemes/reforms, distinguish between the 'Objective' (Single Market) and the 'Speculative Outcome' (Overtaking China). UPSC accepts the former but rejects the latter as hyperbole.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance. Available with ExamRobot Pro.
The core claim is that GST replaced multiple indirect taxes collected by different authorities; several references state GST subsumed Central and State taxes into a single tax.
High-yield for GS prelims and mains: explains the structural reform aim of GST and its federal implications. Connects to fiscal federalism, tax administration and inter-governmental revenue flows. Useful for questions on tax reform rationale, benefits like single market creation, and challenges in Centre‑State fiscal relations.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (GST) > p. 90
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > For Central and State Governments > p. 178
The enactment of GST required a constitutional amendment that moved taxing powers to enable a national indirect tax replacing earlier levies.
Important for polity and governance questions: links constitutional amendment process to economic reform. Helps answer questions on the legal/constitutional mechanism for creating GST and Centre‑State jurisdiction over taxation. Master by mapping amendment to changes in financial powers and subsequent state Acts.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (GST) > p. 90
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > Goods and Services Tax (GST): > p. 174
References mention GST amalgamated many taxes, is destination‑based, and addresses cascading by input tax credit — all explain how multiple taxes were replaced in practice.
Practically useful for answering 'how' GST changed tax incidence and trade costs. Links to topics on tax efficiency, input tax credit mechanism, and implications for trade within India. High-yield for explaining economic rationale and administrative impact of GST.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > Box 5.3: GST: One Nation, One Tax, One Market > p. 82
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > Details about GST > p. 91
Multiple references claim GST replaced many taxes and aimed at a single, unified market across India.
High-yield for UPSC: this captures the policy rationale behind GST and often appears in economy/IR questions. Understanding it helps answer linkage questions on national integration of markets, federal fiscal reforms, and impacts on trade and growth. Master via comparison of pre- and post-GST tax fragmentation and its intended outcomes.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > Box 5.3: GST: One Nation, One Tax, One Market > p. 82
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > Box 5.3: GST: One Nation, One Tax, One Market > p. 83
References describe the tri-part GST structure and that inter-state supplies attract IGST—showing the mechanism used to harmonise taxation across states.
Important for UPSC: explains how GST preserves federal roles while creating common rules; useful for questions on centre-state fiscal relations, tax incidence and supply-chain taxation. Learn the roles of CGST/SGST/IGST and destination-based principle for application-type questions.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > Goods and Services Tax (GST): > p. 174
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > Details about GST > p. 91
Evidence notes the 101st Amendment enabled GST and the GST Council was created to coordinate rates and administration between centre and states.
Crucial for UPSC: links constitutional change with institutional design in fiscal federalism. Questions often probe legality, governance and cooperative federalism; understanding the amendment and the Council clarifies decision-making and dispute-resolution mechanisms. Study the amendment's effect and the Council's composition/powers.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > Goods and Services Tax (GST): > p. 174
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 47: Goods and Services Tax Council > ESTABLISHMENT > p. 434
References state GST standardises taxes, reduces cascading effects and overall cost of production, which can influence export competitiveness — a channel through which GST could affect the current account.
High-yield for UPSC: links fiscal policy (indirect taxation) to external sector outcomes (exports/imports). Useful for questions on reforms → supply-side competitiveness → trade performance. Master by mapping transmission channels: tax simplification → lower production costs → export competitiveness → potential CAD impact, and note moderating factors.
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > Box 5.3: GST: One Nation, One Tax, One Market > p. 83
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > For business and industry > p. 177
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts. Unlock micro-concepts with ExamRobot Pro.
The GST Council's voting math is the next logical trap. Remember: The Centre has 1/3rd voting power, States have 2/3rd. A decision requires a 3/4th majority. This means neither the Centre nor the States can pass a decision unilaterally—a 'Shadow Fact' often swapped in options.
Apply the 'Adjective Filter'. Words like 'Drastically' (St 2) and 'Enormously' (St 3) are red flags in Economy questions. Economic reforms have incremental, lagged effects, not instant magical ones. If an option sounds like a political campaign speech ('Overtake China'), eliminate it.
Connect GST to 'Fiscal Federalism' in GS-2 Mains. While GST created a 'Single Market' (Economic Integration), it arguably reduced the 'Fiscal Autonomy' of states (Political Centralization), leading to tensions over Compensation Cess.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault. Unlock the Mentor's Vault with ExamRobot Pro.