Question map
In the context of mitigating the impending global warming due to anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide, which of the following can be the potential sites for carbon sequestration ? 1. Abandoned and uneconomic coal seams 2. Depleted oil and gas reservoirs 3. Subterranean deep saline formations Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because all three sites mentioned are potential locations for carbon sequestration.
Abandoned and uneconomic coal seams can be used for carbon injection, and such injection may sometimes result in the displacement of methane, which could be used as a fuel.[1] Depleted oil reserves are explicitly mentioned as artificial sinks for carbon sequestration.[2] The oil and gas industries have used carbon capture for decades as a way to enhance oil and gas recovery.[2]
Regarding subterranean deep saline formations, CO² can be effectively stored in the earth's subsurface by geodynamic trapping and solubility trapping.[3] Additionally, carbon dioxide can react with the minerals, fluids, and organic matter to form stable compounds or minerals through mineral carbonation.[3] Deep saline aquifers represent suitable geological formations where these trapping mechanisms can operate effectively.
Since all three options—uneconomic coal seams, depleted oil and gas reservoirs, and subterranean deep saline formations—are validated as potential carbon sequestration sites, option D (1, 2 and 3) is correct.
Sources- [1] https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/srccs_wholereport-1.pdf
- [2] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 21: Mitigation Strategies > zr.r.r. Sinks > p. 281
- [3] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 21: Mitigation Strategies > Geologic Sequestration Trapping Mechanisms > p. 282
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Applied Environment' question. It moves beyond the definition of CCS to its implementation. While 'Depleted Oil Reserves' is a direct book fact (Shankar), the others require knowing the 'Big Three' geological storage types often cited in climate reports (IPCC).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can abandoned and uneconomic coal seams be used as potential sites for carbon dioxide sequestration to mitigate global warming from anthropogenic CO2 emissions?
- Statement 2: Can depleted oil and gas reservoirs be used as potential sites for carbon dioxide sequestration to mitigate global warming from anthropogenic CO2 emissions?
- Statement 3: Can subterranean deep saline formations be used as potential sites for carbon dioxide sequestration to mitigate global warming from anthropogenic CO2 emissions?
- Explicitly identifies injection of CO2 into unminable (uneconomic) coal seams as a storage option.
- Notes that CO2 injection into such seams can displace methane, indicating a practical trapping/interaction mechanism and a potential co-benefit.
- States that coal reservoirs can retain (adsorb) CO2 because of higher sorption selectivity relative to N2 and CH4.
- Supports the mechanism by which coal seams can act as CO2 storage sites (sorption trapping).
Defines carbon capture and storage (CCS) as capturing CO2 and permanently storing it underground, establishing that underground storage is an accepted mitigation approach.
A student can combine this with facts about coal seams being underground reservoirs to ask whether specific seam geology could serve as CCS sites.
Describes coal seams as enormous, thick and geographically distributed underground deposits (Damuda series), indicating the physical existence of substantial underground coal strata.
One could use a geological map to locate thick/abandoned seams and then evaluate their depth, extent and structural setting for potential CO2 storage.
Notes that fossil fuels were buried and can remain buried for millions of years until geological movements expose them—showing that buried carbon reservoirs can be long-term underground stores.
A student might infer that if buried carbon can remain sequestered naturally, engineered injection into stable buried formations (like seams) could likewise be long-term, subject to geological stability checks.
Gives an example of tertiary coal deposits (e.g., Neyveli lignite) with seam thickness (10–12 m), showing that some seams are sufficiently thick to consider as discrete underground units.
Using seam thickness and location data, a student could estimate storage volume potential and assess whether abandoned seams might hold meaningful CO2 volumes.
Describes physical characteristics of bituminous/coking coal occurring in compressed seams, implying varied seam properties (density, compression) that could affect fluid flow and storage behavior.
A student could extend this by checking whether seam permeability and compaction (not given here) would permit CO2 injection and retention in specific coal types.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.