Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. As per law, the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority exists at both National and State levels. 2. People's participation is mandatory in the compensatory afforestation programmes carried out under the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A (Statement 1 only is correct).
The Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016 establishes a National Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority at the national level, and a State Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority in each State and Union territory[1]. This confirms that Statement 1 is correct—the law does provide for CAMPA authorities at both National and State levels.
However, Statement 2 is incorrect. While the funds are primarily spent on afforestation to compensate for loss of forest cover, regeneration of forest ecosystem, wildlife protection and infrastructure development[2], there is no provision in the documents that makes people's participation mandatory in compensatory afforestation programmes under the Act. The Act focuses on fund management and utilization by designated authorities rather than mandating community participation.
Therefore, only Statement 1 is correct, making option A the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/2151/1/A2016-38.pdf
- [2] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 10: Indian Forest > Salient features > p. 168
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewStatement 1 is standard static material found in Shankar IAS/Singhania. Statement 2 is derived from the *criticism* of the Act (its conflict with FRA 2006). To solve this, you needed to know what the Act *failed* to include, not just what it included.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Under the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016 (India), does the law establish Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authorities (CAMPA) at both the national and state levels?
- Statement 2: Does the Compensatory Afforestation Fund Act, 2016 (India) make people's participation mandatory in compensatory afforestation programmes carried out under the Act?
- Describes constitution of a CAMPA body by the Central Government (April 2004) for managing compensatory afforestation monies.
- Mentions CAMPA as envisaged via Supreme Court orders, linking a formal institutional setup to legal/administrative action.
- Refers explicitly to a National Fund and State Funds receiving payments for compensatory afforestation and related charges.
- Implies a two-tier financial/administrative structure (national and state) for managing these funds.
- Notes use of CAMPA funds by State governments for afforestation and plantation works.
- Supports the idea that CAMPA-related resources and implementation operate at the state level.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.