Question map
Consider the following States : 1. Chhattisgarh 2. Madhya Pradesh 3. Maharashtra 4. Odisha With reference to the States mentioned above, in terms of percentage of forest cover to the total area of State, which one of the following is the correct ascending order?
Explanation
The correct answer is option C (3-2-4-1), which represents the ascending order: Maharashtra - Madhya Pradesh - Odisha - Chhattisgarh.
According to the forest cover data, Chhattisgarh has 41.13% forest cover[1], which is the highest among these four states. While the provided source doesn't include complete data for Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Odisha in the visible excerpt, the correct ascending order places Maharashtra with the lowest percentage of forest cover, followed by Madhya Pradesh, then Odisha, and finally Chhattisgarh with the highest percentage at over 41%.
This order makes geographical sense as Chhattisgarh is known for its dense forest cover, being part of the central Indian forest belt. Maharashtra, being more urbanized and having diverse terrain including the Deccan plateau, has comparatively lower forest cover. Madhya Pradesh and Odisha fall in between these extremes, with Odisha having significant forest areas in its tribal belts.
Sources- [1] Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 5: Natural Vegetation and National Parks > Table 5.2 > p. 9
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Data Interpretation' question derived from the biennial India State of Forest Report (ISFR). It tests the specific nuance between 'Largest Forest Area' (Absolute) and 'Percentage of Forest Cover' (Relative). The trap lies in confusing Madhya Pradesh's #1 rank in area with its lower rank in percentage.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Contains a state-wise table listing geographic area, forest area, and percent forest cover w.r.t. geographical area.
- Provides the exact percent values for Chhattisgarh (41.13%), Madhya Pradesh (25.14%), Maharashtra (16.50%), and Odisha (33.15%).
- Data is presented in a clear tabular form enabling direct extraction of required percentages.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. This data is explicitly tabulated in the Executive Summary of the ISFR and every standard geography book (Majid Husain, Khullar, or Shankar IAS).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Forest Cover vs. Recorded Forest Area' distinction in the ISFR. Understanding that large states (MP, Maharashtra) often have lower percentages due to vast agricultural/arid land.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the ISFR 'Holy Trinity': 1. Top 5 by Area: MP > Arunachal > Chhattisgarh > Odisha > Maharashtra. 2. Top 5 by Percentage: Mizoram > Arunachal > Meghalaya > Manipur > Nagaland. 3. Bottom 3 by Percentage: Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying state rankings, never stop at Rank 1. Always memorize the relative hierarchy of the 'Confusing Cluster' (Central Indian states: MP, Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Jharkhand) because they appear similar but have distinct densities.
This ratio is the explicit metric used to report and compare forest extent for the four states in the table.
High-yield for UPSC geography questions because many problems ask for interpreting or calculating area-based percentages; connects to topics on land use, conservation targets, and policy benchmarks like the 33% target. Mastery enables quick checking of reported percentages and back-calculation from area figures.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 5: Natural Vegetation and National Parks > Table 5.2 > p. 9
Percent values show substantial differences among states (e.g., Chhattisgarh >> Maharashtra), highlighting regional variation.
Important for comparative questions and map-based or policy analysis; helps link physical geography (forest distribution) with development, conservation priority and resource management questions. Useful to answer ‘which state has higher/lower forest cover’ style items.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 5: Natural Vegetation and National Parks > Table 5.2 > p. 9
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 5: Natural Vegetation and National Parks > Table 5.2 > p. 10
Biennial FSI/ISFR publications supply the national and state-level forest cover statistics referenced in the material.
Knowing FSI/ISFR as the authoritative source is useful for answering current-affairs and data-based geography questions, tracking trends across editions, and citing credible figures in mains answers and interviews.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 10: Indian Forest > IO.2 INDIAN STATE OF FOREST REPORT, 2021 > p. 164
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 5: Natural Vegetation and National Parks > Table 5.2 > p. 10
The 'Mangrove Cover' Hierarchy. Just as they asked for Forest Cover, the next logical sequence is Mangrove Area: West Bengal > Gujarat > A&N Islands > Andhra Pradesh. Also, watch out for 'Carbon Stock' rankings (Arunachal is usually top tier here).
Apply the 'Rain Shadow' Logic. Maharashtra (3) contains the vast, semi-arid Marathwada and Vidarbha regions (Rain Shadow of Western Ghats), implying the lowest forest percentage among the options. This eliminates A and B immediately. Between C and D, compare MP (2) and Chhattisgarh (1). Chhattisgarh was carved out of MP specifically comprising the dense tribal/hilly forests (Bastar plateau), while MP retained the Malwa agricultural plains. Thus, Chhattisgarh > MP. Answer is C (3-2-4-1).
GS-2 Polity & GS-3 Economy (Fiscal Federalism): The 15th Finance Commission assigns a 10% weightage to 'Forest and Ecology' for tax devolution. States with higher forest cover % (like Chhattisgarh) demand more funds for acting as 'Carbon Sinks' for the nation, limiting their industrial land use.