Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. The Constitution of India defines its 'basic structure' in terms of federalism, secularism, fundamental rights and democracy. 2. The Constitution of India provides for 'judicial review' to safeguard the citizens' liberties and to preserve the ideals on which the Constitution is based. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (Neither 1 nor 2) because both statements are technically inaccurate regarding the text of the Constitution.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: The term "Basic Structure" is not defined or even mentioned in the Constitution of India. It is a judicial innovation introduced by the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973). While federalism and secularism are part of this structure, their classification as such comes from judicial interpretation, not a constitutional definition.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: Although the power of judicial review is an integral part of our constitutional system (derived from Articles 13, 32, 131-136, and 226), the specific phrase "Judicial Review" is nowhere explicitly mentioned or "provided for" as a defined term within the text of the Constitution of India.
Since the Constitution neither defines "basic structure" nor explicitly uses the term "judicial review," both statements are factually wrong in a strict constitutional sense.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Text vs. Interpretation' trap. Statement 1 tests if you know that 'Basic Structure' is a judicial invention (Kesavananda Bharati), not a constitutional text. Statement 2 is standard static polity found in Laxmikanth. The strategy is simple: The Constitution is a rulebook, not a dictionary; it rarely 'defines' abstract concepts.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Constitution of India define its "basic structure" as federalism, secularism, fundamental rights and democracy?
- Statement 2: Does the Constitution of India provide for judicial review to safeguard citizens' liberties and to preserve the ideals on which the Constitution is based?
- Passage explicitly states the Constitution 'defines' its basic structure using the exact four terms in the statement.
- The wording in the passage matches the statement verbatim, providing direct support.
- The source is a polity/Constitution document excerpt that asserts this definition.
Gives a published list of 'elements of the basic structure' including 'sovereign, democratic and republican nature' and 'secular character', showing courts/textbooks treat these concepts as elements.
A student could compare this list with the statement's items to see overlap (secularism, democracy) and check for mention of federalism/fundamental rights elsewhere.
Summarises the S.R. Bommai judgment which explicitly names 'Federalism', 'Secularism' and 'Democracy' as elements of the basic structure.
Use the Bommai listing to support or test the presence of those three terms in the claimed definition by checking other case lists or primary sources.
States that 'The Fundamental Rights form the basic structure of the Constitution', linking fundamental rights to the doctrine.
Combine this with lists of basic-structure elements to assess whether 'fundamental rights' are commonly treated as part of the basic structure.
Explains that the phrase 'basic structure' does not appear in the text of the Constitution and is a judicial doctrine arising from case law.
A student could use this to infer that any 'definition' must come from judicial rulings or commentary rather than the constitutional text itself, so check landmark judgments for authoritative lists.
Describes the Constitution's secularism (Articles 25–28) and the framers' intent, supporting secularism's centrality in constitutional structure.
Use this operational evidence (rights and articles) to correlate why secularism would be regarded as a basic-structure element in judicial/academic lists.
- Affirms supremacy of the Constitution and assigns judiciary the task of deciding validity of statutes
- Specifically links judicial review to protection of Fundamental Rights and describes courts as 'sentinel on the qui vive'
- Explains that while the term 'judicial review' is not in the text, the Supreme Court can strike down laws that contravene Fundamental Rights
- Notes the Court’s power extends to federal relation conflicts when laws conflict with constitutional distribution of powers
- Sets out the scope/grounds of judicial review, including infringement of Fundamental Rights
- Directly ties judicial review to checking legislative and executive action for constitutional repugnancy and excess of competence
- [THE VERDICT]: Statement 1 is a TRAP (Constitution does not define Basic Structure). Statement 2 is a SITTER (Laxmikanth Ch 27). Answer is B.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Distinction between 'Constitutional Provisions' (Written Text) and 'Constitutional Law' (Judicial Doctrines).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Terms NOT defined in the Constitution: 'Basic Structure', 'Judicial Review' (phrase not used, concept implied), 'Federation' (uses Union of States), 'Untouchability', 'Minority', 'Martial Law', 'Office of Profit', 'Violation of the Constitution'.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Whenever a statement says 'The Constitution DEFINES [Abstract Concept]', be hyper-skeptical. The Constitution defines administrative terms (like 'State' in Art 12), not political philosophies.
The basic structure is a judicial doctrine and the Constitution contains no explicit definition of 'basic structure'.
High-yield: explains the limit on Parliament's amendment power and anchors questions on constitutional amendments and judicial review. Mastery helps in answering questions on Kesavananda, Article 368 limits, and the judiciary's role in protecting constitutional identity.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 9: CONSTITUTION AS A LIVING DOCUMENT > Contribution of the Judiciary > p. 214
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 12: Basic Structure of the Constitution > ELEMENTS OF THE BASIC STRUCTURE > p. 128
The Supreme Court has declared features such as federalism, secularism, democracy and fundamental rights to be part of the basic structure.
High-yield: enables precise listing and explanation of judicially recognized basic features for both prelims and mains. Connects to cases like S.R. Bommai and discussions on Centre–State relations, secularism and rights protection.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 12: Basic Structure of the Constitution > Table 12.1 Evolution of the Basic Structure of the Constitution > p. 130
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 12: Basic Structure of the Constitution > ELEMENTS OF THE BASIC STRUCTURE > p. 128
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > CHAP. 8 Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Duties 97 > p. 97
Supremacy of the Constitution and restriction on Parliament's amending power are central to the basic structure doctrine.
High-yield: essential for essays and answers on why certain amendments can be struck down, linking judicial review, separation of powers and the protection of fundamental rights. Useful across polity, governance and constitutional law questions.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 12: Basic Structure of the Constitution > ELEMENTS OF THE BASIC STRUCTURE > p. 128
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > CHAP. 8 Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Duties 97 > p. 97
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 12: Basic Structure of the Constitution > Table 12.1 Evolution of the Basic Structure of the Constitution > p. 130
Judicial review is the mechanism used to strike down laws that infringe Fundamental Rights and thereby safeguard citizens' liberties.
High-yield for UPSC: directly ties Fundamental Rights to judicial remedies; connects to constitutional safeguards, landmark cases, and questions on rights protection. Mastering this helps answer questions on rights enforcement, limits on legislative power, and remedies available to citizens.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 27: Judicial Review > p. 297
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > JUDICIARY AND RIGHTS > p. 139
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 27: Judicial Review > SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW > p. 298
Judicial review operates when a law or executive action infringes Fundamental Rights, exceeds competence, or is repugnant to constitutional provisions.
Essential for answering asks on when courts can intervene, differences from other jurisdictions, and federal conflicts; useful for essays and problem‑scenario questions about validity of legislation and separation of powers.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 27: Judicial Review > SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW > p. 298
The judiciary functions as the sentinel of the Constitution, preserving core constitutional principles and ensuring Parliament respects constitutional limits.
Crucial for questions on checks and balances, basic structure doctrine, and amendment powers; links constitutional theory with practical judicial review, making it central for mains answers and case‑based prelims.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 27: Judicial Review > p. 297
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 4: OUTSTANDING FEATURES OF OUR CONSTITUTION > OUTSTANDING FEATURES OF OUR CONSTITUTION > p. 44
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS > 4.4 THE JUDICIARY > p. 70
The term 'Cabinet' was NOT in the original Constitution. It was inserted in Article 352 only by the 44th Amendment (1978). Similarly, 'Budget' is not mentioned; the text says 'Annual Financial Statement' (Art 112).
The 'Definition Heuristic': If an option claims the Constitution *defines* a complex concept like Federalism, Secularism, or Basic Structure, it is almost certainly FALSE. The Constitution describes *mechanisms*, it doesn't write definitions for ideologies.
Mains GS-2 (Separation of Powers): The Basic Structure doctrine is the Judiciary's check on the Parliament's 'Constituent Power' (Art 368), preventing 'Constitutional Despotism'.