Question map
The Preamble to the Constitution of India is
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4. The legal status of the Preamble has evolved through landmark Supreme Court judgments, specifically the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), which overruled the Berubari Union case to declare that the Preamble is indeed a part of the Constitution.
However, its legal effect is nuanced:
- Non-justiciable: Like the Directive Principles, the Preamble is non-enforceable in a court of law. It is neither a source of power for the legislature nor a prohibition upon its powers.
- Interpretative Role: While it has no independent legal effect (making Option 3 incorrect), it serves as a "key to the minds of the makers." It is used to clarify ambiguous provisions of the Constitution.
Therefore, while it is an integral part of the constitutional framework, it functions only in tandem with other specific articles to provide context and purpose, validating Option 4.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Laxmikanth Sitter' but with a twist of legal nuance. It tests not just the binary fact (Is it a part? Yes/No) but the *consequence* of that status. The trap lies in distinguishing between 'no legal effect' (Option A) and 'no independent legal effect' (Option D).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the Preamble to the Constitution of India a part of the Constitution and does it have no legal effect?
- Statement 2: Is the Preamble to the Constitution of India not a part of the Constitution and does it have no legal effect?
- Statement 3: Is the Preamble to the Constitution of India a part of the Constitution and does it have the same legal effect as any other part of the Constitution?
- Statement 4: Is the Preamble to the Constitution of India a part of the Constitution but without independent legal effect apart from other parts of the Constitution?
- Directly records the Kesavananda Bharati (1973) decision that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution.
- States the Court overruled its earlier view and held the Preamble can be amended (implying constitutional status).
- Expressly says the Preamble is not enforceable in a court of law (i.e., not independently justiciable).
- Also describes the Preamble as stating objectives and aiding interpretation, distinguishing enforceability from interpretative role.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.