Question map
Consider the following statements : I. Panchayats at the intermediate level exist in all States. II. To be eligible to be a Member of a Panchayat at the intermediate level, a person should attain the age of thirty years. III. The Chief Minister of a State constitutes a commission to review the financial position of Panchayats at the intermediate levels and to make recommendations regarding the distribution of net proceeds of taxes and duties, leviable by the State, between the State and Panchayats at the intermediate level. Which of the statements given above are not correct?
Explanation
All three statements are incorrect, making option D the correct answer.
**Statement I is incorrect:** A state having a population not exceeding 20 lakh may not constitute panchayats at the intermediate level.[1] Therefore, panchayats at the intermediate level do not exist in all states.
**Statement II is incorrect:** A person who has attained the age of 21 years will be eligible to be a member[2] of a Panchayat, not 30 years as stated. The age requirement is 21 years for panchayat membership at all levels.
**Statement III is incorrect:** The governor of a state shall, after every five years, constitute a finance commission to review the financial position of the panchayats.[4] It is the Governor who constitutes the State Finance Commission, not the Chief Minister. Additionally, the commission reviews the distribution between the state and the panchayats of the net proceeds of taxes and allocation of shares amongst the panchayats at all levels[3], not just at the intermediate level.
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 389
- [2] Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 18: PANCHAYATS > Qualification for membership. > p. 320
- [3] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 390
- [4] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 390
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a 'Gatekeeper Question'โgetting this wrong disqualifies you from the race. It relies entirely on the foundational text of the 73rd Amendment found in Laxmikanth and NCERT. The traps (Age 30 vs 21, CM vs Governor) are standard UPSC inversions that require zero current affairs, just precise static memory.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Do panchayats at the intermediate level exist in all Indian states under the Constitution (Panchayati Raj system)?
- Statement 2: What is the minimum age requirement to be a member of a panchayat at the intermediate level in India?
- Statement 3: Which authority constitutionally constitutes the State Finance Commission to review the financial position of panchayats in India?
- Statement 4: Does the State Finance Commission for panchayats in India recommend the distribution of the net proceeds of state taxes and duties between the State and panchayats and the allocation among panchayats at all levels?
- Explicitly states a state having population not exceeding 20 lakh may not constitute panchayats at the intermediate level.
- Frames this as an exception to uniformity in the three-tier structure, directly answering whether intermediates exist in all states.
- Specifies the intermediate panchayat exists only in States where the population is above 20 lakhs.
- Links the existence of the intermediate tier directly to a population threshold, making the rule and its exception clear.
- Says the intermediary level need not be constituted in smaller States, confirming the exception in simpler terms.
- Reinforces that the three-tier model is not mandatory for states below the size threshold.
- Directly states the eligibility age for membership as 21 years.
- Contrasts Panchayat eligibility with State Legislature (25 years), clarifying the 21-year rule applies to Panchayat membership.
- Found in a constitutional commentary section specifically on Panchayats and qualification for membership, giving topical authority.
- Explicit wording: states 'The governor of a state shall, after every five years, constitute a finance commission to review the financial position of the panchayats.'
- Directly links the Governor as the constitutional authority responsible for constituting the State Finance Commission.
- Repeats the same clear formulation: 'The governor of a state shall, after every five years, constitute a Finance Commission to review the financial position of the Panchayats.'
- Provides corroborating textual statement reinforcing the Governor's role.
- Explicitly states the Governor shall constitute a Finance Commission to review Panchayats' finances every five years.
- Specifies the Commission must recommend the distribution between the State and the Panchayats of net proceeds of taxes, duties, tolls and fees levied by the State and the allocation of shares among panchayats at all levels.
- Directly repeats the five-year appointment and review mandate for the State Finance Commission.
- Specifies recommendations include distribution of net proceeds of State-levied taxes, and how allocation is to be made among various levels of Panchayats.
- Indicates a State Finance Commission is directed to review Panchayat finances every five years and make recommendations on revenue distribution between the State and Panchayats.
- Includes determination of grants-in-aid, linking resource distribution and fiscal support for Panchayats.
- [THE VERDICT]: Absolute Sitter. Direct hits from Laxmikanth (Ch: Panchayati Raj) and NCERT Class XI (Local Governments).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act > Structural Mandates (3-tier) & Constitutional Authorities (SFC/SEC).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Polity Number Game': Age 21 (Panchayat), 25 (Lok Sabha), 30 (Rajya Sabha), 35 (President). Memorize the 'Authority Matrix': Governor appoints SFC & SEC; President appoints UPSC/EC. Memorize the 'Exceptions': 20 Lakh population limit for intermediate tier; PESA areas; 5th/6th Schedule exemptions.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading a constitutional provision, always play 'Devil's Advocate': Is this rule absolute? (No, <20L exception). Who signs the paper? (Governor, not CM). UPSC creates statements by swapping the 'Authority' (CM for Governor) and the 'Number' (30 for 21).
Intermediate panchayats are mandatory only in states with population above 20 lakh; smaller states may omit the intermediate tier.
High-yield for questions on the structure of Panchayati Raj and constitutional exceptions; connects to decentralisation and administrative design. Mastering this helps answer questions about mandatory vs. optional local-government tiers and related amendment effects.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 389
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 18: PANCHAYATS > PANCHAYATS > p. 319
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 8: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS > Three Tier Structure > p. 183
The 73rd Amendment constitutionalised panchayats and envisaged a three-tier system: village, intermediate, and district.
Core to constitutional governance and local self-government topics; links to schedules/parts of the Constitution, decentralisation, and subsequent state enactments. Knowing this enables tackling questions on constitutional reforms and tiered governance.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 4: Salient Features of the Constitution > III I Three-tier Government > p. 33
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Panchayati Raj > p. 383
Part IX allows certain matters (e.g., manner of electing village chairpersons, representation rules) to be determined by state legislatures, showing implementation flexibility.
Important for questions on centreโstate relations, devolution of powers, and the operational autonomy of local bodies; it links constitutional provisions to practical variability across states and aids in evaluating policy implementation questions.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > III I Voluntary Provisions > p. 392
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Panchayati Raj > p. 383
Panchayat members must have attained 21 years of age to be eligible for election.
High-yield for questions on local governance eligibility and constitutional provisions; connects to broader topics of electoral qualifications and comparisons with legislative age requirements, enabling elimination-style answers in MCQs.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 18: PANCHAYATS > Qualification for membership. > p. 320
Panchayats operate at village, intermediate and district levels, with the intermediate tier required only where state population exceeds 20 lakh.
Important for questions on Panchayati Raj architecture and federal variations; links to administrative geography, decentralisation debates, and constitutional amendments affecting local bodies.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 18: PANCHAYATS > PANCHAYATS > p. 319
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 389
Members at village, intermediate and district levels are elected directly; chairpersons at intermediate and district levels are elected indirectly from among elected members.
Frequently tested in governance and polity sections; helps in understanding democratic processes at the grassroots and in answering questions on electoral procedures and reservation/representation mechanisms.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 389
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > II ICompulsory Provisions > p. 392
The Governor of a state is the constitutional authority who constitutes the State Finance Commission for Panchayats.
High-yield for polity questions: knowing which constitutional office appoints bodies is frequently tested and connects to studies of CentreโState relations, state executive powers, and constitutional provisions under Part IX. Enables answering questions on constitutional appointments and institutional design.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 390
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Salient Features > p. 390
The State Election Commissioner (SEC) is appointed by the Governor, but can ONLY be removed in the like manner and on the like grounds as a Judge of a High Court. UPSC will likely trap you by saying 'removed by the Governor at his pleasure'.
The 'Constitutional Dignity' Hack: Constitutional bodies (like Finance Commissions) are almost always constituted by the Head of State (President/Governor), not the Head of Government (PM/CM). Statement III says 'Chief Minister constitutes...'โthis is constitutionally inappropriate language. Mark it wrong immediately.
Mains GS-2 (Devolution of Powers): The failure of states to constitute State Finance Commissions (SFCs) regularly is a major bottleneck for fiscal federalism. Link this to the 15th Finance Commission's mandate that local bodies must have audited accounts to receive performance grants.