All differences in this world are because of the difference in approach and not of substance

"ALL DIFFERENCES IN THIS WORLD ARE BECAUSE OF DIFFERENCES IN APPROACH AND NOT OF SUBSTANCE" In the movie 'THE SKY IS PINK', the protagonist son shares his sorrow with his mother of his teacher scolding him because he said the sky colour is Pink. The teacher she told the child that sky's colour is Blue in fact. But the protagonist told the child that sky's colour is the colour you imagine to be. The sky colour can be blue, red & orange or even black. It is dependent on the climatic influence.

The artist can use any colour to paint their sky to depict the message they want. to artist creates 2 belongs to themselves only. Likewise, Everyone's life is their own world they create, their home is their own castle. They are at forefront to decide through which lens they want to choose to see the world, its beauty & its species. They are to decide the food they choose to feed their brains, the clothes to wear on their thoughts. During Independence struggle, there were numerous economic approaches emerging. Socialism, Communism, indust- -rialist policies, democratic socialism were few prominent ones. People started taking sides because of the future they imagined. They had their own sets of arguments & counter arguments stemming from reading or lived experience or global exposure. No one was wrong.

Because India is a diverse country. Every region requires its own different policy approach. Globally, the "migration crisis" is pushing governments to take firm decision. Some believe nations who were responsible & contributed most to economic destruction of migrating population country through war or climate change interference in regional politics should be held responsible for their action & host the immigrants. And the other section argues historic injustice cannot force present govt & its citizens of host countries to pay the price.

Ethically seen, they should be held responsible. But resource crunch and growing population makes it difficult. The debate over "freebies" is also taking political stage. States are monetary (transfer) withdrawing politically fueled schemes because of fiscal burden. Critics argue long term institutional expenditure is a sign of development. The other side argues without present short term incentives like DBT especially to women, students & marginalised section, it is difficult to empower their access to those institutions.

development consists of two aspects, Affordability & accessibility. If nation builds quality government schools but doesn't incentivize parents to send their children, they would never. Because one day of child labour translates to food to survive. Major NGO's associated with environment conservation often focus on technical aspects of damage to environment whereas grassroot NGOs or socialist activists arguments include livelihood of indigenous population who have for generations co-existed with nature & her species and tried their best to protect contribute towards her evolution.

Anekantvada, ancient philosophy was centred on the idea that their is no fundamental good or bad actions. There is no line between truth & false, seen & unseen. The whole world itself is an illusion because it is society's conception that is reinforced on generations. It is our lens we pass on. There might be modifications in future, but fundamentals stay the same, the existence of time is for our convenience. For that matter, "to survive, you have kill the other" principle of animal kingdom became inhumane in human's ethical dimension. Then why do we have certain do's & dont's? Humans are inherently selfish. Because we are one of the species in earth's evolutionary journey. For the fittest to survive the other has to die.

But we are capable of living with each other if we minimise our greeds. Earth has sufficient resource to accommodate. them equally, it is patriarchy & greed that controls them. To the extent that women themselves carry forward its structure. Peace, humanity, empathy, fraternity, equality, liberty should be some universal principles to curb the bloodshed and exclusion formed otherwise.

Humans have built such systems. They have built their own mechanical world assumed to be superior to nature itself. But when seen in universal viewpoint everything can be seen & interpreted differently. There is no one benchmark to evaluate events. Every now and then, studies surrounding stars come out.