Performance Report
When two elephants fight it is the Grass that is trampled
Needs work
41
/ 100
Overall Performance
Needs work
Score Breakdown
Introduction
Hook, Thesis, Roadmap
42
/ 100
Hook: 40
Thesis: 50
Roadmap: 30
Essay Sections
Content, Strategy, Analysis
65
/ 100
Content: 65
Strategy: 32
Analytical: 65
Conclusion
Synthesis, Closure, Impact
10
/ 100
Synthesis: 10
Closure: 20
Forward Look: 10
Impact: 10
Language
Writing quality across all sections
47
/ 100
41 100
You made a standard attempt.
The student has made a commendable attempt to address the topic, but the analysis lacks depth, and critical sections such as historical context are missing.
Solid effort, but lacking depth and structure. Needs a historical backbone and analytical rigor to elevate it.
Introduction
139 7
Words: 139
Target: 60-100

When 2 elephants fight, it is the grass that gets trampled. This is the common phrasing which is applicable to various events in the surrounding environment - when 2 elephants they fight, it is the grass which often get harmed the most. For instance, in political sphere, in order to gather more votes & emphasizing on vote banks, politicians often use 'hate speech' as a weapon against a particular sect, community, group, etc. thereby causing a threat to the unity & integrity of the country. So, it further exacerbate separatist tendencies among the public & leading to issue of separatism, naxalism, communalism & fundamentalism. Also, when there is a fight between judiciary [protector of rights] & legislature regarding laws, it is often the public which has to bear the brunt of this, as there is lack of transparency, accountability.

When 2 elephants fight, it is the grass that gets trampled. This is the common phrasing which is applicable to various events in the surrounding environment - when 2 elephants they fight, it is the grass which often get harmed the most. For instance, in political sphere, in order to gather more votes & emphasizing on vote banks, politicians often use 'hate speech' as a weapon against a particular sect, community, group, etc. thereby causing a threat to the unity & integrity of the country. So, it further exacerbate separatist tendencies among the public & leading to issue of separatism, naxalism, communalism & fundamentalism. Also, when there is a fight between judiciary [protector of rights] & legislature regarding laws, it is often the public which has to bear the brunt of this, as there is lack of transparency, accountability.

↑ Insert after "Introduction"
→
GAP: Historical Context of Geopolitical Conflicts — Add a section that traces historical instances where major powers clashed, highlighting the negative impacts on third-party nations. (Including historical context provides a foundation for understanding the ongoing relevance of current conflicts. It allows the reader to grasp the cyclical nature of geopolitical struggles and their consequences.)
Political and Social Conflicts
178 4 1
Words: 178
Target: 80-150

Eg, issues like marital rape have not looked upon by them due to shifting of responsibilities. This is not restricted in political sphere, rather is highlighted at international level. Recently, ongoing international wars between Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Palestine where their territorial interests are prioritized, the civilian population has to pay the price by shedding their blood & losing lives. At social level, the fight between mother & father, affects children there arise the need of filiocentric family, where the role of children in decision-making is appreciated. Also, the tribals are misplaced from their lands, their culture in order to do development v/s environment conservation. The race for resources bet^n developing countries (e.g. Arctic region) which is rich in minerals, fossil fuels, etc, has increased the pace of climate change, thereby, further making lower strata of the society; against the fight for climate change. Also, in order to keep inflation with 6% & also increasing revenue collection, - fuels for vehicles are spiked at higher prices. Also the trend of 'freebies' for vote politics, the taxpayers are on the loss side.

Eg, issues like marital rape have not looked upon by them due to shifting of responsibilities. This is not restricted in political sphere, rather is highlighted at international level. Recently, ongoing international wars between Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Palestine where their territorial interests are prioritized, the civilian population has to pay the price by shedding their blood & losing lives. At social level, the fight between mother & father, affects children there arise the need of filiocentric family, where the role of children in decision-making is appreciated. Also, the tribals are misplaced from their lands, their culture in order to do development v/s environment conservation. The race for resources bet^n developing countries (e.g. Arctic region) which is rich in minerals, fossil fuels, etc, has increased the pace of climate change, thereby, further making lower strata of the society; against the fight for climate change. Also, in order to keep inflation with 6% & also increasing revenue collection, - fuels for vehicles are spiked at higher prices. Also the trend of 'freebies' for vote politics, the taxpayers are on the loss side.

→
NEEDS DEPTH: Political and Social Conflicts — Deepen the analysis by not just discussing conflicts, but critically evaluating their broader implications and providing specific case studies. (Transitioning from description to critical analysis makes arguments more robust and persuasive. It demonstrates a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in geopolitical conflicts.)
See full section analysis
Conclusion
14
Words: 14
Target: 60-100

Thus, 2 elephant's fight is not restricted to their sphere but has spillover effect.

Thus, 2 elephant's fight is not restricted to their sphere but has spillover effect.

↑ Insert after "Conclusion"
→
STRUCTURAL GAP: Conclusion — Move the conclusion to reflect on the proposed solutions and their significance instead of reiterating the metaphor. (A conclusion that connects back to solutions reinforces the essay's main argument and leaves the reader with a sense of closure and action, rather than just a metaphorical reflection.)
Incorporate historical context, deepen analysis, and reorder sections to create a cohesive and compelling argument that addresses the essay prompt effectively.
End of essay
42/100 Needs Work
Introduction Analysis
The Art of First Impressions

Your introduction is your one chance to make the examiner want to read more. Think of it as a movie trailer: grab attention, make a promise, and create anticipation. Most students start with definitions - the essay equivalent of 'once upon a time.' Distinguished essays start with intrigue.

[Introduction to Conflict Impact] Introduction
42/100 Developing
40
Hook (S01)
50
Thesis (S02)
30
Roadmap (S03)
50
Language
Professor's Remark

"The introduction presents an interesting metaphor, but it lacks clarity and depth needed to draw in the reader effectively."

What I Liked

"The use of the metaphor sets a solid foundation for discussing the impact of conflicts."

What I Found Weak

"The thesis is vague, and the roadmap is unclear, making it hard for the reader to anticipate the argument's structure."

What Would Push Higher

"Clarifying the thesis and effectively integrating a clear roadmap will greatly enhance the introduction."

Your Introduction Ingredients
Current: Metaphor and context about political hate speech.
Target: Hook + Thesis + Roadmap
You Have:
  • Metaphorical hook
  • Context of conflict
  • Examples of issues
You Need:
  • A stronger and more engaging hook Hook
  • A clear and debatable thesis statement Thesis
  • A clear roadmap outlining the structure of the essay Roadmap
Focusing on potent hooks, succinct thesis statements and clear roadmaps can greatly improve the engagement and clarity of the introduction.
The Hook: Your First 10 Words

The hook is your opening punch. It should make the examiner's eyebrows rise, create a question in their mind, or present a tension that demands resolution. Definitions don't do this. Questions, paradoxes, and vivid scenarios do.

Most students start with 'X has been important since ancient times.' This is true but boring. Your hook should be surprising, not safe.

Hook Score (S01) 40/100
Your Hook Attempt Sentence 1

"When 2 elephants fight, it is the grass that gets trampled."

No Hook Detected
Effectiveness: The hook is metaphorical but lacks immediate relevance to the essay's context and doesn't provoke curiosity.
What's Missing: It doesn't frame the broader discussion of conflict in a way that hooks the reader's attention with urgency or emotional resonance.
Choose an alternative
Hook Alternatives
1 Provocative Question

"What happens to society when the powerful clash, leaving the vulnerable to suffer?"

Why it works: This question directly engages readers' emotions and prompts them to think critically about the consequences of conflicts.

2 Paradox Hook

"In a battle for power, the innocent often pay the price; why is that the case?"

Why it works: A paradox highlights the unexpected consequences of conflict, drawing readers into the complexity of the issue.

3 Scenario Hook

"Imagine a landscape where the powerful throw punches on a global stage, while the ordinary citizens struggle to survive the fallout."

Why it works: A scenario paints a vivid picture that situates the reader in a relatable setting, making the abstract concept more concrete.

What Changed: The transformation shifts from a generic metaphor to engaging hooks that provoke thought and connect directly to the essay's themes.

Hook Types Reference

Ask a question that challenges assumptions or creates intellectual tension

Template:
In an age of [modern reality], why do [surprising behavior/belief] persist?
When to use: When your topic has a modern vs. traditional tension
Memory Hook: Make the examiner's brain itch with a question it wants answered.

Present a contradiction that creates cognitive dissonance

Template:
[Concept] promises [X], yet delivers [opposite/unexpected].
When to use: When your topic has inherent tensions or contradictions
Memory Hook: Paradox = Intellectual tension. The reader must read on to resolve it.

Paint a vivid picture with unexpected actors or situations

Template:
A [unexpected person 1] does [X]. A [unexpected person 2] does [Y]. [Pattern/Insight].
When to use: When concrete examples create surprise
Memory Hook: Show, don't tell. Concrete images beat abstract statements.

Lead with a surprising number that demands explanation

Template:
[Surprising statistic]. Behind this number lies [deeper truth].
When to use: When you have a genuinely surprising data point
Memory Hook: Numbers shock when they contradict expectations.
Weak Openings to Avoid
  • X has been important since ancient times.
  • In today's world, X is very relevant.
  • X is a topic of great significance.
  • Since time immemorial, X has...
  • X can be defined as...
Examiner Psychology

"The first sentence tells the examiner who they're dealing with. A definition says 'average student.' A paradox says 'someone who thinks differently.' First impressions stick."

Foundation: Thesis + Roadmap

Your thesis is your promise to the reader - what you're going to prove. Your roadmap is the journey you'll take them on. Together, they set up your entire essay. A weak foundation means the examiner isn't sure where you're going.

Thesis without a position is just a topic sentence. Roadmap without anticipation is just a table of contents.

Thesis Score (S02) 50/100
Your Thesis Attempt Sentence 2

"This is the common phrasing which is applicable to various events in the surrounding environment - when 2 elephants they fight, it is the grass which often get harmed the most."

Effectiveness: The thesis conveys a relevant aspect of the topic but lacks clarity and directness.
What's Missing: It is convoluted and not clearly debatable; it should state a more precise position that allows room for disagreement.
Thesis Upgrades
1 Crisp Stand

"In times of conflict, it is the marginalized who suffer the most from political and social upheaval."

Why it works: This statement is clear, assertive, and directly positions the argument in a way that is debatable and recognizable.

2 Debatable Angle

"While conflicts are often seen as struggles for power, the true casualty is often society itself, leading to enduring divisions."

Why it works: This acknowledges different perspectives, setting a foundation for a nuanced discussion about the effects of conflict.

3 Sophisticated Balance

"Conflicts among powerful entities notably deteriorate societal cohesion, yet the underlying grievances of marginalized communities remain overlooked."

Why it works: This perspective acknowledges complexity and provides a more sophisticated analysis, inviting the reader to consider the multifaceted impacts of conflict.

What Changed: Transformations refine the thesis into a clearer, more assertive position, suggesting that conflicts have specific consequences for society.

Thesis Types Reference
Crisp Stand

Clear, direct position with analytical edge

Template: [X] is [position] because [reason that can be debated].
If no one could disagree, it's not a thesis.
Debatable Angle

Acknowledge counter-view, then take position

Template: While critics argue [counter-view], this essay contends [your position].
Show you know the debate, then pick a side.
Sophisticated Balance

Embrace complexity with a nuanced position

Template: [X] is both [A] and [opposite of A] - and [implication of this duality].
Nuance signals intellectual maturity.
Roadmap Score (S03) 30/100
Your Roadmap Attempt Sentence 3

"For instance, in political sphere, in order to gather more votes & emphasizing on vote banks, politicians often use 'hate speech' as a weapon against a particular sect, community, group, etc. thereby causing a threat to the unity & integrity of the country."

Effectiveness: The roadmap lacks clarity about what will be discussed in the body of the essay, making it difficult to anticipate the structure of the argument.
What's Missing: It fails to provide a clear preview of the key points that will be addressed, leading to confusion about the essay’s direction.
Roadmap Upgrades
1 Natural Flow

"This essay will explore how conflicts in the political, judicial, and social spheres trample over the rights and well-being of the public."

Why it works: This foreshadows specific areas of discussion, allowing the reader to anticipate the argument’s structure and flow.

2 Question-Based

"How do political conflicts, judicial struggles, and social divisiveness collectively harm society?"

Why it works: Posing a guiding question invites the reader into the analytical journey, ensuring engagement from the outset.

3 Thematic Preview

"By examining political manipulation, judicial power struggles, and rising communal tensions, this essay aims to uncover the hidden consequences of conflict."

Why it works: This thematic reference highlights the scope without giving away too much, creating curiosity.

What Changed: The roadmap is transformed into a clear preview of the essay structure, providing readers with expectations of what will be discussed.

Roadmap Types Reference
Natural Flow

Weave structure into narrative without listing

Template: To understand [theme], we must first [section 1], then [section 2], and finally [section 3 with tension].
Hide the list inside a story.
Question-Based

Frame structure as questions to be answered

Template: Three questions guide this inquiry: [Q1]? [Q2]? [Q3]?
Questions create curiosity. Readers want answers.
Thematic Preview

Drop intriguing references without explaining

Template: From [intriguing reference 1] to [intriguing reference 2] - this essay maps [terrain].
Tease, don't spoil. Make them want to know more.
Examiner Psychology

Thesis: "A clear thesis tells the examiner 'I'm going to argue something.' This creates anticipation and gives them a lens to evaluate your essay. No thesis = no argument = lower marks."

Roadmap: "A good roadmap tells the examiner 'this essay is organized and going somewhere interesting.' A list tells them 'this student is mechanical.' Anticipation beats information."

The Opening Polish

Your introduction is the most scrutinized part of your essay. Every word matters. We'll teach you three style techniques that instantly elevate your opening: Parallelism, Antithesis, and Crescendo.

Introductions often suffer from 'playing it safe.' This is exactly when you need to take stylistic risks.

Language Score 50/100
Examiner's First Impression

"The language use is functional but lacks sophistication."

Style Techniques Check
Parallelism
Missing
Your attempt: "Not present"
Enhanced version: "In conflicts over power, through manipulative rhetoric, by using fear tactics - the innocent lose most."
Antithesis
Missing
Your attempt: "Not present"
Enhanced version: "While power-hungry individuals clash, society languishes in silence."
Crescendo
Missing
Your attempt: "Not present"
Enhanced version: "As political tensions rise, social unity shatters, and the cries of the affected go unheard."
Sentence Transformation Ladder
Sentence 2
Original:
"This is the common phrasing which is applicable to various events in the surrounding environment - when 2 elephants they fight, it is the grass which often get harmed the most."
Good "This metaphor describes how conflicts impact societal stability."
Better "This metaphor encapsulates the tragic irony of conflict, where those with the least power bear the heaviest burdens."
Best "This poignant metaphor illustrates the tragic irony of conflict dynamics, revealing how the elite's skirmishes manifest as widespread suffering among the powerless."
The advanced and premium versions are clearer, more elegant, and capture the nuance of the original metaphor.
The Power Opener
Original

"When 2 elephants fight, it is the grass that gets trampled."

Diagnosis: This is a clichéd statement and doesn't immediately connect to the essay's deeper themes.
Power Version

"When powerful entities clash, the most vulnerable often bear the consequences in silence."

Techniques used: Analogy Emotion Imagery
Style Technique Reference
Parallelism

Repeating grammatical structure for rhythm and emphasis

Example: "Faith consoles the grieving, binds the community, and challenges the policy-maker."
Template: [Subject] [verb 1] the [object 1], [verb 2] the [object 2], and [verb 3] the [object 3].
Think triplets: THREE parallel phrases hit harder than two.
Antithesis

Placing contrasting ideas in parallel structure to highlight tension

Example: "Science asks how; faith asks why. The modern mind needs both questions."
Template: [X] does [A]; [Y] does [opposite of A]. [Resolution/implication].
Antithesis = Intellectual tension. Find the BUT in your topic.
Crescendo

Building from small to large, quiet to loud, personal to universal

Example: "From whispered prayers to temple bells to the roar of pilgrim millions - faith scales from intimate to immense."
Template: From [small/personal] to [medium] to [large/universal] - [insight].
Crescendo = Volume up. Start whisper, end thunderclap.
The Complete Transformation

See how all the elements come together. This is what a distinguished introduction looks like.

139

Words Before

102

Words After
Your Original Introduction

When 2 elephants fight, it is the grass that gets trampled. This is the common phrasing which is applicable to various events in the surrounding environment - when 2 elephants they fight, it is the grass which often get harmed the most. For instance, in political sphere, in order to gather more votes & emphasizing on vote banks, politicians often use 'hate speech' as a weapon against a particular sect, community, group, etc. thereby causing a threat to the unity & integrity of the country.

Transformation Applied
Distinguished Introduction

What happens to society when the powerful clash, leaving the vulnerable to suffer? In an age where political rhetoric fuels division, it is often the innocent who bear the brunt of conflicts. This essay will explore how political manipulation, judicial struggles, and social divisiveness collectively harm society, emphasizing the devastating impact on unity and integrity.

What Changed in Each Layer
hook

An engaging question was added to draw attention immediately.

thesis

The thesis was clarified to reflect a strong and debatable position.

roadmap

A clearer structure of the essay was provided, indicating the main areas of focus.

language

Language was refined for clarity and engagement.

Introduction Structure Blueprint
Ideal Structure
  1. Hook (attention)
  2. Thesis (promise)
  3. Roadmap (anticipation)
Common Mistake
  1. Definition
  2. Vague statement
  3. List of sections

Most introductions are forgettable because they play it safe. Distinguished introductions take risks: provocative hooks, debatable theses, and roadmaps that tease.

Inside the Examiner's Mind
First Impression Effect

The first paragraph colors the entire reading experience. Start strong and you're read generously.

Differentiation Signal

A unique opening signals 'this student is different.' The examiner pays more attention.

Thesis as Lens

A clear thesis gives the examiner a framework. Without it, they're lost and frustrated.

Anticipation Value

A good roadmap creates eagerness. The examiner looks forward to each section instead of dreading it.

Your Growth Journey
Stage 1 Definition Writer

Focus: Stop opening with definitions

Goal: Recognize boring openings

Week 1-2
Stage 2 Hook Crafter

Focus: Master 3 hook types

Goal: Grab attention consistently

Week 3-4
Stage 3 Thesis Builder

Focus: State debatable positions

Goal: Make clear arguments

Week 5-6
Stage 4 Master Opener

Focus: Integrate all elements with style

Goal: Unforgettable introductions

Week 7+
End of introduction analysis