The office-bearers of a workers' union are physically preventing a section of the workers from entering the premises of the industrial establishment where they work to show solidarity with the union which had given a call for a strike. The argument is becoming increasingly heated with some of the office-bearers threatening to resort to violence. As an officer of the Central Industrial Security Force in-charge of the situation, which one of the following actions would you consider the best under the circumstances?

As the officer-in-charge of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), the primary responsibility is to ensure the security of the industrial establishment and the safety of its personnel. In this scenario, the office-bearers are illegally obstructing workers from exercising their right to work and are threatening violence.

• Option C is the most appropriate immediate action because it fulfills the duty of protecting willing workers and ensures the industrial unit remains functional, while maintaining a physical presence to deter violence and maintain order.
• Option A is incorrect as it demonstrates a lack of leadership and an attempt to shift responsibility to another officer.
• Option B is a disproportionate use of force that should only be a last resort in extreme, life-threatening situations.
• Option D, while legally possible, might prematurely escalate the tension into a full-scale riot; escorting provides a more immediate tactical solution to the problem of access.