The question is whether 'A' stole the Laptop of 'B'. Which one of the following is not relevant as per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ?

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (and the subsequent Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam), facts are relevant if they show motive, preparation, opportunity, or conduct (Sections 7 and 8). In this scenario:

• Option B is relevant under Section 8 as "subsequent conduct" (selling the stolen property).
• Option D is relevant under Section 7 as it establishes "opportunity" (having the key to the room where the theft occurred).
• Option C is relevant under Section 7 or 9 as it relates to the "state of things" or "identity," establishing that the accused had specific, exclusive access/authorization to the device.
• Option A is not relevant because knowing how to operate a common electronic device like a laptop is a general skill possessed by a vast population. It does not provide a specific link, motive, or unique opportunity that distinguishes the accused from others in the context of the theft.