Change set

Pick exam & year, then Go.

Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked
Loading…
Q122 (CISF/2018) Polity & Governance › Governance, Policies & Social Justice

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a witness summoned by a Court of Law to produce a document which is in his possession has to do which one of the following ?

Explanation

According to Section 162 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a witness summoned to produce a document that is in their possession or power must bring it to the Court, regardless of any objection they might have regarding its production or admissibility. The law mandates that the witness "shall bring it to Court," and the responsibility to decide on the validity of any objection rests solely with the Court, not the witness.

The Court may inspect the document to determine the merit of the objection, except in cases involving documents of State. This provision ensures that the judiciary maintains the authority to evaluate claims of privilege or confidentiality rather than allowing a witness to unilaterally withhold evidence. Therefore, Option A is the correct legal requirement under the Act.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

CISF · 2019 · Q129 Relevance score: 4.84

Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is not correct?

CISF · 2024 · Q137 Relevance score: 4.69

What does 'evidence', under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, mean?
1. Statements in relation to matters of fact under inquiry which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses
2. Documents produced for the inspection of the court including electronic records
Select the correct answer using the code given below.

CISF · 2021 · Q129 Relevance score: 3.99

"Evidence" under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 includes

CISF · 2019 · Q121 Relevance score: 3.62

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, 'Public Documents' include

CISF · 2021 · Q127 Relevance score: 3.58

Content of a document under Section 61 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 may be proved by