Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked
Loading…
Q108 (CDS-I/2002) Polity & Governance › Judiciary › Judiciary

In India, the authorised strength of the Supreme Court Judges, including the Chief Justice is

Result
Your answer: —  Â·  Correct: B
Explanation

Explanation intentionally skipped due to low exam relevance today.

How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
50%
got it right
✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

IAS · 2021 · Q68 Relevance score: 1.62

With reference to Indian judiciary, consider the following statements : 1. Any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India can be called back to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the President of India. 2. A High Court in India has the power to review its own judgement as the Supreme Court does. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

IAS · 2012 · Q85 Relevance score: 1.16

What is the provision to safeguard the autonomy of the Supreme Court of India? 1. While appointing the Supreme Court Judges, the President of India has to consult the Chief Justice of India. 2. The Supreme Court Judges can be removed by the Chief Justice of India only. 3. The salaries of the Judges are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India to which the legislature does not have to vote. 4. All appointments of officers and staffs of the Supreme Court of India are made by the Government only after consulting the Chief Justice of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

IAS · 2014 · Q75 Relevance score: 1.10

The power to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court of India is vested in

CAPF · 2008 · Q37 Relevance score: 0.86

In India, the power to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court lies with—

CDS-I · 2004 · Q45 Relevance score: 0.79

Who is authorised to transfer the judge of one High Court to another High Court?