Question map
With reference to Indian judiciary, consider the following statements : 1. Any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India can be called back to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the President of India. 2. A High Court in India has the power to review its own judgement as the Supreme Court does. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1.
Statement 1 is correct: Under Article 128 of the Indian Constitution, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) can request a retired judge of the Supreme Court or a retired judge of a High Court (who is duly qualified) to sit and act as a judge of the Supreme Court for a temporary period. This requires the prior consent of the President and the person to be appointed.
Statement 2 is incorrect in the strict constitutional sense. While the Supreme Court is explicitly granted the power to review its judgments under Article 137, there is no corresponding specific article for High Courts. Although High Courts, as Courts of Record under Article 215, exercise inherent powers to review their judgments to prevent a miscarriage of justice, they do not possess the specific constitutional "power of review" in the same manner as the Supreme Court.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Reward for Revision' question. It punishes those who skip the comparative nuances between the Supreme Court and High Courts. The source is pure Laxmikanth; no current affairs or obscure law journals were needed. If you know the 'Court of Record' implications, this is free marks.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can any retired judge of the Supreme Court of India be recalled to sit and act as a Supreme Court judge by the Chief Justice of India with prior permission of the President of India under Indian judiciary rules?
- Statement 2: Does a High Court in India have the power to review its own judgments in the same manner and scope as the Supreme Court of India?
- Explicitly states the Chief Justice of India can request a retired Supreme Court judge to act as a Supreme Court judge for a temporary period.
- Specifies the recalled person must be duly qualified for appointment as a Supreme Court judge.
- Notes that such a judge enjoys the full jurisdiction, powers and privileges of a Supreme Court judge while acting.
- Directly records the CJI's power, with the previous consent of the President, to request a retired Supreme Court judge to act temporarily as a Supreme Court judge.
- References constitutional articles (127-128) governing temporary appointment of retired or ad hoc judges.
- Affirms the same formulation: CJI can request a retired Supreme Court or high court judge to act temporarily as a Supreme Court judge.
- Reiterates the qualification requirement and that the acting judge assumes full judicial powers and privileges.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.