Question map
What are the significances of a practical approach to sugarcane production known as 'Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative'? 1. Seed cost is very low in this compared to the conventional method of cultivation. 2. Drip irrigation can be practiced very effectively in this. 3. There is no application of chemical/inorganic fertilizers at all in this. 4. The scope for intercropping is more in this compared to the conventional method of cultivation. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) is a set of better management practices for sugarcane cultivation. SSI involves using less seeds, raising[2] seedlings in a nursery,[1] and using less water, which makes **statement 1 correct** as seed costs are significantly reduced. SSI uses wider plant spacing and is an alternative to conventional seed, water and space intensive sugarcane cultivation[3], which makes **statement 4 correct** as wider spacing allows for intercropping opportunities. Drip irrigation involves precise, slow application of water and has proved successful in terms of economy of water and increased yield in a wide range of crops[4], and given SSI's focus on water efficiency, **statement 2 is correct** as drip irrigation can be effectively practiced. However, SSI involves better water and nutrient[5] management [6]with optimum use of inputs, which implies balanced fertilizer use rather than complete elimination of chemical fertilizers, making **statement 3 incorrect**. Therefore, statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct.
Sources- [2] https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20193144595
- [4] Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 12: Major Crops and Cropping Patterns in India > Other Methods of Irrigation > p. 73
- [6] https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20193144595
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question is a classic 'Logic over Knowledge' test. While SSI was a specific current affair (WWF-ICRISAT project), the answer is derived entirely by eliminating the extreme Statement 3. If a method is 'Sustainable' (not 'Organic' or 'Natural'), it optimizes chemicals rather than banning them completely.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) significantly reduce seed/seedling cost compared to conventional sugarcane cultivation?
- Statement 2: Can drip irrigation be practiced effectively under the Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) for sugarcane?
- Statement 3: Does the Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) eliminate the use of chemical/inorganic fertilizers entirely in sugarcane cultivation?
- Statement 4: Does the Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) provide greater scope for intercropping compared to conventional sugarcane cultivation?
Protected cultivation is noted as useful for 'raising quality seedlings' and for more efficient resource use.
A student could infer that if SSI uses protected/quality-seedling methods, it might change per-unit seedling costs and then compare typical protectedânursery costs with conventional practice.
The Sub-Mission on Seed and Planting Material emphasizes the seed supply chain and importance of access to quality planting material.
One could use this to check whether SSI relies on institutional seed supply (with known costs/subsidies) versus farmerâsaved material and thus infer relative cost changes.
Only a small share of holdings use certified or hybrid seeds; many farmers rely on farmâsaved seeds (seed replacement ratio concept).
Using this, a student might compare whether SSI increases use of certified/raised seedlings (raising upfront cost) or promotes onâfarm lowâcost methods (reducing cost) by estimating how SSI changes the seed source distribution.
New seed varieties frequently require careful management and costly inputs to succeed.
If SSI involves adopting improved planting material, a student could reason that associated management costs might offset seed cost savings â so compare total seed+input costs under SSI vs conventional.
Subsidies (power, credit, etc.) and price incentives alter cropping and input choices for cash crops like sugarcane.
A student could investigate whether seed/seedling costs under SSI are affected by available subsidies (reducing farmer outlays) versus conventional systems lacking such support.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.