Question map
With reference to Initiative for Nutritional Security through Intensive Millets Promotion', which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. This initiative aims to demonstrate the improved production and post-harvest technologies, and to demonstrate value addition techniques, in an integrated manner, with cluster approach. 2. Poor, small, marginal and tribal farmers have larger stake in this scheme. 3. An important objective of the scheme is to encourage farmers of commercial crops to shift to millet cultivation by offering them free kits of critical inputs of nutrients and microirrigation equipment. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option C (statements 1 and 2 only).
INSIMP (Initiative for Nutritional Security through Intensive Millets Promotion) provides farmers with input support and services in the form of free certified seed minikits, training, and incentive for hybrid seed production.[1] This aligns with statement 1's description of demonstrating improved production and post-harvest technologies in an integrated manner with a cluster approach. Statement 2 is also correct as millets are traditionally grown by resource-poor farmers in rainfed areas, making poor, small, marginal and tribal farmers the primary beneficiaries of this scheme.
However, statement 3 is incorrect. The scheme does not specifically aim to encourage commercial crop farmers to shift to millet cultivation by offering free kits of nutrients and micro-irrigation equipment. The scheme's focus is on supporting existing millet farmers with seed minikits, training, and production incentives, rather than converting commercial crop farmers to millet cultivation through nutrient and irrigation equipment packages.
Sources- [1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188307/
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewFair but tricky. Statements 1 and 2 use standard 'bureaucratic positive' language (integrated, pro-poor) which are usually correct in UPSC. Statement 3 is the 'Devil in the Detail'—specifically the claim of 'free micro-irrigation equipment'. Government schemes offer subsidies for hardware, rarely free kits. This is a logic check on fiscal prudence, not just a memory check.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Initiative for Nutritional Security through Intensive Millets Promotion aim to demonstrate improved production and post-harvest technologies and value-addition techniques in an integrated manner using a cluster approach?
- Statement 2: Does the Initiative for Nutritional Security through Intensive Millets Promotion primarily target or give larger stakes/benefits to poor, small, marginal and tribal farmers?
- Statement 3: Does the Initiative for Nutritional Security through Intensive Millets Promotion include as an objective encouraging farmers of commercial crops to shift to millet cultivation by offering free kits of critical nutrient inputs and micro-irrigation equipment?
- Explicitly mentions strengthening production clusters and linking them with markets — aligns with a cluster approach.
- Specifically refers to reducing post-harvest losses via farm-gate infrastructure and developing agro-logistics — matches post-harvest technology aims.
- Calls for increasing food processing capacities and value addition in the value chain linked to production clusters.
- Describes KVKs conducting on-farm testing and demonstrations of location-specific agricultural technologies — supports the 'demonstrate improved production technologies' element.
- Highlights extension, training and dissemination functions that enable demonstration at farmers' fields.
- Describes an end-to-end integrated approach covering production, storage, marketing and value addition — supports the 'integrated manner' claim.
- Shows precedent of schemes aiming for integrated interventions across the production-to-value-add chain.
This snippet states that governments introduce targeted rural development programmes aimed at specific groups such as small and marginal farmers to augment rural incomes.
A student could infer that new crop-focused initiatives (like millet promotion) are plausibly designed as targeted programmes and then check programme documents to see if beneficiaries lists match these groups.
IRDP explicitly lists target groups including scheduled tribes, marginal and small farmers as recipients of subsidies and assistance.
Use this pattern (designating STs and small/marginal farmers as priority beneficiaries) to look for similar beneficiary lists or subsidy provisions in the millet initiative to test if it prioritises these groups.
The Rainfed Area Development Programme is described as aiming to improve quality of life especially for small and marginal farmers with an end-to-end package covering production, storage, marketing and value addition.
Since millets are often grown in rainfed/low-input areas, a student could check whether the millet initiative adopts similar end-to-end measures targeted at rainfed smallholders to judge its focus.
Mentions target-group programmes like SFDA/MFDA and special area programmes for hill, north-eastern and tribal areas, showing a common policy pattern of designing schemes specifically for marginal and tribal areas.
Compare the geographic and institutional targeting (e.g., MFDA/SFDA, tribal area focus) of the millet initiative with these established target-group programme models to infer likely beneficiary emphasis.
Notes that Indian agriculture is dominated by marginal and small farmers who face disadvantages and that institutional mechanisms (FPOs) share profits/benefits among members.
A student could check whether the millet initiative uses FPOs/producer-group mechanisms or similar institutional arrangements that typically aim to benefit small/marginal farmers.
- Explicitly names INSIMP and describes input support under the scheme (free certified seed minikits, training, incentives).
- Shows INSIMP provides free seed minikits and training — supporting part of the statement about offering free input kits.
- Describes substantial micro-irrigation assistance in other government schemes (percent assistance for micro-irrigation systems).
- Passage shows micro-irrigation support exists in separate programs but does not attribute micro-irrigation equipment provision to INSIMP in the available texts.
Describes benefits and strong role of micro‑irrigation in saving water, improving input efficiency and increasing farmer income — showing micro‑irrigation is a plausible tool a millet promotion initiative might use.
A student could infer that a program aiming to boost millet cultivation might include provision/support for micro‑irrigation kits and then check program documents for such provisions.
States governments should ensure farmers' access to inputs, credit and irrigation to advance food and nutritional security — indicating policy precedent for supplying inputs as part of security/production programmes.
One could extend this rule to hypothesize that a millet promotion initiative might include free or subsidised input kits and verify against the Initiative's official objectives.
Mentions explicit government support to Indian Institute of Millet Research as Centre of Excellence and other millet‑focused measures — showing official policy emphasis on millets.
Given this stated institutional support, a student could reasonably suspect related schemes might include incentives for farmers (inputs/equipment) and then look up scheme details.
Notes millets (sorghum) are drought‑hardy and concentrated in dry regions, implying that targeted irrigation or inputs could be relevant levers to expand millet area or replace commercial crops.
Using this agronomic pattern, a student could argue that micro‑irrigation and nutrient kits would be logical components to encourage shifts and then seek confirmation in programme text.
Describes the Deccan interior as a dry‑farming area where millets coexist with other crops and notes that development of other enterprises can augment farmer income — suggesting crop‑shift incentives are contextually plausible.
A student might extend this to hypothesise that offering inputs/equipment could make millet adoption more attractive in such dry regions and then verify program objectives.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap (Statement 3). While based on a real scheme (INSIMP), the specific operational guideline regarding 'free micro-irrigation' was the eliminator.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Dryland Farming & Nutritional Security (GS-3 Agriculture).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Millet Basket': Jowar (Sorghum), Bajra (Pearl Millet), Ragi (Finger Millet). Know the 'Shree Anna' initiative. Compare: NFSM-Coarse Cereals vs INSIMP. Key Institutes: IIMR Hyderabad. Key nutrients: Ragi (Calcium), Bajra (Iron).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading scheme guidelines, categorize benefits into: 1. Knowledge (Training/Demonstration), 2. Consumables (Seeds/Fertilizer - often free/minikits), 3. Assets (Machinery/Irrigation - usually subsidized, not free). UPSC swaps these categories to create traps.
The statement hinges on using a cluster approach; several references define and describe agriculture-based cluster strategies and schemes based on clusters.
High-yield for UPSC: cluster-based models feature in questions on agri-infrastructure, value chains and rural development. Understanding the rationale, benefits and scheme examples helps answer policy, economy and GS3 questions. Prepare by comparing cluster approaches (Mega Food Parks, production clusters) and their objectives and outcomes.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 10: Agriculture - Part I > 10.11 Agriculture Based Clusters > p. 319
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 13: Food Processing Industry in India > MEGA FOOD PARK SCHEME > p. 412
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 12: Supply Chain and Food Processing Industry > Objectives: > p. 370
Demonstration of improved production technologies is commonly delivered via extension mechanisms like KVKs, cited in the references.
Important for prelims and mains: KVKs and extension systems are recurrent topics under agriculture and rural development. Master their roles, functions and linkage to technology adoption; use scheme examples and case studies to answer application-based questions.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 10: Agriculture - Part I > 10.7 Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVK) > p. 311
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 12: Supply Chain and Food Processing Industry > Objectives: > p. 370
The statement asserts an integrated approach (production, post-harvest, value addition); references describe end-to-end approaches and measures to reduce post-harvest losses and boost processing.
Core for GS3 and ethics-case questions: linking production, storage, logistics and processing explains policy choices for food security and farmer incomes. Study examples of integrated schemes, interventions to reduce post-harvest loss, and linkages to market/processing.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > RAINFED AREA DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (RADP) > p. 53
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 12: Supply Chain and Food Processing Industry > Objectives: > p. 370
Several references describe programmes specifically designed to give assistance/subsidy to targeted rural poor groups including small, marginal farmers and scheduled tribes.
High-yield concept for UPSC: many questions ask which schemes target which groups. Understanding target-group schemes (IRDP, SFDA, MFDA) helps answer questions on policy focus, equity and poverty alleviation. Prepare by mapping major rural schemes to their target beneficiaries and objectives; useful in mains answers and scheme-comparison MCQs.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (IRDP) > p. 19
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Planning and Sustainable Development in Indian Context > Target Area Planning > p. 67
References highlight the structural disadvantages of small/marginal farmers (limited risk-taking, low productivity) and propose institutional responses like Farmers Producer Organizations (FPOs).
Crucial for GS papers and essays: links agrarian structure to policy measures. Questions often require analysis of constraints faced by smallholders and institutional/policy solutions (FPOs, cooperatives). Study by linking problems to specific institutional instruments and examples.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > Landless Labourers > p. 65
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 10: Agriculture - Part I > 10.8 Farmers Producer Organization (FPO) > p. 311
Evidence shows programmes aiming at rainfed, tribal and backward areas to improve livelihoods of small and marginal farmers through end-to-end support (production, storage, marketing).
Important for questions on regional disparities, sustainable agriculture and inclusive policymaking. Knowing scheme features for rainfed and tribal areas helps answer questions on targeted interventions and rural development strategy; prepare by comparing objectives and components of such schemes.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > RAINFED AREA DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (RADP) > p. 53
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Planning and Sustainable Development in Indian Context > Target Area Planning > p. 67
The statement concerns a millet-promotion initiative; several references describe millets' classification, nutritional value and where they are grown.
Millets feature in questions on food and nutritional security, cropping patterns and dryland agriculture. Mastering millet types, regional distribution and nutritional significance helps answer questions on crop diversification, nutrition-sensitive agriculture and state/regional cropping strategies. Prepare by consolidating taxonomy, state-wise maps and links to nutrition/food security policy.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 12: Major Crops and Cropping Patterns in India > Millets /Jowar (Sorghum bicolor) > p. 26
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 12: Major Crops and Cropping Patterns in India > Millets /Jowar (Sorghum bicolor) > p. 27
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 25: Agriculture > Millets > p. 353
Ragi (Finger Millet) has the highest Calcium content (approx. 344mg/100g) among all cereals, while Bajra (Pearl Millet) is rich in Iron. UPSC loves asking which crop is richest in a specific nutrient.
The 'Fiscal Prudence' Hack: Look at Statement 3—'free kits of... microirrigation equipment'. Micro-irrigation (drip/sprinkler) is expensive infrastructure. Governments provide *subsidies* (e.g., 50-80% under PMKSY), never 'free kits' like they do for seeds. Also, targeting 'commercial crop farmers' to shift is rare; schemes usually target fallow/waste land or existing subsistence farmers. Eliminate 3 based on fiscal improbability.
Mains GS-3 (Environment + Economy): Millets are 'Climate-Smart Crops' (Low water footprint, often C4 plants with high photosynthetic efficiency). Use this to argue for Millets in answers about Climate Resilient Agriculture and solving the Water Crisis in regions like Marathwada.