Question map
The power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States falls under its
Explanation
The Supreme Court has exclusive original jurisdiction in federal disputes, where exclusive means no other court can decide such disputes and original means the power to hear such disputes in the first instance, not by way of appeal.[1] As a federal court, the Supreme Court decides disputes between different units of the Indian Federation, including disputes between the Centre and one or more states, between the Centre and any state or states on one side and one or more other states on the other, or between two or more states.[1]
Original jurisdiction means cases that can be directly considered by the Supreme Court without going to the lower courts before that.[2] This is distinct from advisory jurisdiction (where the President seeks advice), appellate jurisdiction (hearing appeals from lower courts), and writ jurisdiction (which is primarily for enforcement of Fundamental Rights). The Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court establishes it as an umpire in all disputes regarding federal matters.[3]
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- [2] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > Original Jurisdiction > p. 132
- [3] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > Original Jurisdiction > p. 132
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a 'Bread and Butter' Polity question. It tests the fundamental definition of the Supreme Court's role as a Federal Court. If you miss this, you are out of the race. The strategy is simple: Master the specific Articles (131 vs 132 vs 143) and the exclusions to them.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States fall under its advisory jurisdiction?
- Statement 2: Does the power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States fall under its appellate jurisdiction?
- Statement 3: Does the power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States fall under its original jurisdiction?
- Statement 4: Does the power of the Supreme Court of India to decide disputes between the Centre and the States fall under its writ jurisdiction?
- Explicitly states that disputes between the Centre and one or more States fall within the Supreme Court's exclusive original jurisdiction.
- Explains 'exclusive' (no other court can decide) and 'original' (heard in the first instance), showing these disputes are litigative, not advisory.
- Defines advisory jurisdiction as the President referring matters to the Supreme Court for its opinion.
- Makes clear advisory opinions are optional (Court not bound to answer; President not bound to accept), distinguishing advisory references from adjudicative dispute-resolution.
- Reinforces that original jurisdiction covers federal relations and that such cases go directly to the Supreme Court.
- States that the Supreme Court alone has power to resolve Union–State disputes, underscoring the adjudicatory (original) nature of these disputes.
- Explicitly states disputes between Centre and states fall within the Supreme Court's 'exclusive original jurisdiction'.
- 'Original' is defined in the snippet as the power to hear such disputes in the first instance, not by way of appeal.
- Describes the Supreme Court's functions under Article 131 as 'Original Jurisdiction' for disputes between the Government of India and States.
- Clarifies these federal disputes are within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, implying they are not appellate.
- Defines original jurisdiction as cases that can be directly considered by the Supreme Court without going to lower courts.
- States that cases involving federal relations go directly to the Supreme Court, reinforcing that these are not appeals.
- Explicitly states disputes between the Centre and one or more states fall within the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction.
- Defines 'original' as power to hear such disputes in the first instance and 'exclusive' meaning no other court can decide them.
- Links the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction to Article 131 and confines it to disputes between the Government of India and states.
- Describes these federal disputes as being within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
- Explains original jurisdiction means cases involving federal relations go directly to the Supreme Court without lower court reference.
- Characterises the Supreme Court as the 'umpire' for disputes between the Union and the States, reinforcing original jurisdiction over such matters.
- Identifies disputes between Centre and states as federal disputes falling within the Supreme Court's exclusive original jurisdiction.
- States 'exclusive original jurisdiction' meaning these disputes are heard first by the Supreme Court, not by way of writs or appeals.
- Explains the Supreme Court's writ jurisdiction is for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and contrasts parties in writ cases (citizen vs government) with federal-unit disputes.
- Implies writ power is distinct and narrower than the Court's original jurisdiction over Centre–State disputes.
- Explicitly states the jurisdiction under Article 32 (writ jurisdiction) has no analogy to the jurisdiction under Article 131 (original jurisdiction for federal disputes).
- Reinforces that writ jurisdiction and Article 131 original jurisdiction are separate legal contours.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Direct lift from Laxmikanth Ch. 26 (Supreme Court) or NCERT Class XI 'Indian Constitution at Work' Ch. 6.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Federal Court' function of the Supreme Court under Article 131.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Don't stop at 'Original'. Memorize the exclusions to Art 131: 1) Pre-Constitution treaties/agreements, 2) Inter-state water disputes (Art 262), 3) Matters referred to Finance Commission, 4) Adjustment of expenses between Centre and States. Also, distinguish Art 32 (Writ) vs Art 131 (Federal Dispute).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Use the 'Classification Method'. When studying Judiciary, create a table with columns: Jurisdiction Name | Article | Who can approach? | Binding? | Exclusions. This prevents confusion between 'Advisory' and 'Original' in the exam hall.
The references identify disputes between the Centre and States as within the Supreme Court's exclusive original jurisdiction.
High-yield constitutional concept: frequently tested in questions on Supreme Court powers and federalism. Connects directly to Article 131 and Centre–State relations. Master by memorising the definition, examples (Centre vs State, State vs State), and the meaning of 'exclusive' and 'original'.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > Original Jurisdiction > p. 132
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 22: THE SUPREME COURT > THE SUPREME COURT > p. 346
References explain advisory jurisdiction is a mechanism where the President may seek the Court's opinion, distinct from adjudicating disputes.
Important for questions on separation of powers and Article 143: know that advisory opinions are non‑binding and procedural differences from adjudication. Learn typical uses (questions of public importance/constitutional interpretation) and contrast with original/appellate jurisdiction.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > Advisory Jurisdiction > p. 133
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 22: THE SUPREME COURT > THE SUPREME COURT > p. 352
Evidence contrasts adjudicative original jurisdiction for federal disputes with the advisory, non-binding opinion-giving role.
Useful for answer-writing and MCQs where precise jurisdictional classification is required; helps avoid conflating litigation powers with advisory references. Prepare by comparing each jurisdiction's source, trigger, effect (binding vs non-binding), and examples.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 22: THE SUPREME COURT > THE SUPREME COURT > p. 352
The references repeatedly identify disputes between Centre and States as falling under the Supreme Court's exclusive original jurisdiction (Article 131).
High-yield for polity: Article 131 defines the Court's role in federal disputes and is a frequent topic in UPSC questions on judiciary and Centre–State relations. Master by memorising scope, key phrases ('exclusive', 'original') and sample dispute types; connects to constitutional law and federalism.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 22: THE SUPREME COURT > THE SUPREME COURT > p. 346
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > Original Jurisdiction > p. 132
References contrast 'exclusive original jurisdiction' with appellate jurisdiction by noting 'original means ... not by way of appeal.'
Important conceptual distinction for answering questions about powers of courts. Helps tackle MCQs and mains answers distinguishing first-instance powers from appellate powers; study by comparing provisions (Article 131 vs appellate provisions) and practising short-answers and diagrams.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > Original Jurisdiction > p. 132
Materials characterise the Court as the umpire resolving inter-governmental/federal disputes directly under its original jurisdiction.
Useful for essays and polity questions on Centre–State relations and dispute resolution mechanisms. Shows institutional role (federal arbiter) and links to topics like federalism, constitutional checks and dispute settlement; prepare by mapping institutional functions and landmark examples.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 22: THE SUPREME COURT > THE SUPREME COURT > p. 346
The references define 'original jurisdiction' and state that federal disputes (Centre vs States) are heard by the Supreme Court in the first instance.
High-yield for UPSC constitutional law and polity questions: understanding original vs appellate jurisdiction appears frequently. Links to Article 131, federalism, and dispute resolution. Prepare by memorising definitions, key Article references, and example dispute types.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 26: Supreme Court > III Original Jurisdiction > p. 290
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: JUDICIARY > Original Jurisdiction > p. 132
The 'Private Citizen' Trap: A suit under Article 131 is ONLY for disputes between Federal Units (Centre vs State, State vs State). A private citizen cannot file a suit under Art 131, nor can a private party be impleaded in such a suit. If a future option says 'Dispute between a Corporation and Centre', Art 131 does NOT apply.
Etymological Logic: 'Appellate' implies an 'Appeal' (requires a lower court verdict first). 'Advisory' implies 'Advice' (not a binding dispute resolution). 'Writ' is for 'Rights' (Individual vs State). Since a dispute between the Centre and a State cannot be judged by a High Court (a subordinate federal unit cannot judge the Centre), it has no 'lower' court to start in. It must originate at the top. Hence, 'Original'.
Mains GS-2 (Federalism): Article 131 is the 'Safety Valve' of Indian Federalism. Link this to recent trends where States (e.g., Kerala on CAA, West Bengal on CBI) sue the Centre. It represents the shift from 'Cooperative Federalism' to 'Litigative Federalism'.