Question map
The Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) of sugarcane is approved by the
Explanation
The FRP is approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) on the basis of the cost of production recommended by the Commission for Agricultural Cost and Prices (CACP).[1] This is an important distinction to understand: while FRP is determined by the central government on the basis of recommendations of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP)[2], the final approval authority rests with the CCEA.
MSP is the price paid by government to farmers for procurement, whereas FRP is the price fixed by government but is paid by mill owners. FRP is fixed by government only for sugarcane.[3] The CACP plays a crucial advisory role by recommending the price based on cost of production and other factors, but it is the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs that has the authority to approve and finalize the FRP that sugar mills must pay to farmers.
Sources- [3] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > MINIMUM SUPPORT PRICE > p. 328
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Authority vs. Advisory' trap. The question tests if you can distinguish between the technocratic body that calculates/recommends (CACP) and the political executive body that formally approves (CCEA). It is a fair, standard question found in every serious economy resource.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs approve the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) of sugarcane in India?
- Statement 2: Does the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices approve the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) of sugarcane in India?
- Statement 3: Does the Directorate of Marketing and Inspection (Ministry of Agriculture) approve the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) of sugarcane in India?
- Statement 4: Does the Agricultural Produce Market Committee approve the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) of sugarcane in India?
- Snippet explicitly names the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) as the approving authority for the Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) of sugarcane in a previousāyears question item.
- Direct statement linking FRP approval to CCEA provides the most explicit support among the snippets.
- States that the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution recommends the FRP for sugarcane, identifying the recommendation stage of the process.
- Shows FRP is an announced price (binding on mill owners), implying a formal central approval step follows recommendation.
- Clarifies that FRP is fixed by the government (and specifically applies only to sugarcane), indicating central government involvement in FRP fixation.
- Supports the premise that a central authority (such as CCEA) is the plausible approving body for FRP.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.