Question map
With reference to the Union Government, consider the following statements : 1. The Department of Revenue is responsible for the preparation of Union Budget that is presented to the Parliament. 2. No amount can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund of India without the authorization from the Parliament of India. 3. All the disbursements made from Public Account also need the authorization from the Parliament of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The Budget Division in the DEA (Department of Economic Affairs) has the prime responsibility for the preparation and submission of the Union Budget[1], not the Department of Revenue. Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect.
All expenditures incurred by the government are debited against the Consolidated Fund and no amount can be withdrawn from the Fund without the authorization from the Parliament[2]. This is further reinforced by the constitutional provision that no money can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund except under an Appropriation Act[3]. Therefore, statement 2 is correct.
However, disbursements from the Public Account are not subject to vote by the Parliament, as they are not moneys issued out of the Consolidated Fund of India[4]. The Public Account contains moneys held in trust by the government (like provident funds, small savings, etc.) and their disbursement does not require parliamentary authorization. Therefore, statement 3 is incorrect.
Only statement 2 is correct, making option C the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://dea.gov.in/files/budget_division_documents/Budget_Manual_1.pdf
- [2] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > 4.3 Government Accounts > p. 150
- [3] Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 258
- [4] https://dea.gov.in/files/budget_division_documents/Budget_Manual_1.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Polity-Economy Hybrid' question. While technical manuals exist, the core answers lie in standard texts like Laxmikanth (Parliamentary Funds) and basic Economy NCERTs (Budget Process). The difficulty comes from the specific administrative detail (Department of Revenue vs. DEA) which tests if you read the 'fine print' of the Ministry of Finance structure.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Under the Union Government of India, is the Department of Revenue responsible for preparing the Union Budget presented to Parliament?
- Statement 2: Does the Constitution of India require parliamentary authorization for any withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund of India?
- Statement 3: Does the Constitution of India require parliamentary authorization for disbursements from the Public Account of India?
- Explicitly names the Budget Division in the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) as having the prime responsibility for preparation and submission.
- Identifies DEA (not Department of Revenue) as the organizational unit charged with preparing the Union Budget.
- States that the Union Budget is presented to Parliament by the Finance Minister of India, indicating presentation and central management lie with the Finance Ministry/DEA ecosystem.
- Reinforces that budget presentation is a Finance Ministry function rather than a role attributed to the Department of Revenue in these passages.
Explicitly states that the Budget Division of the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance is the nodal agency for preparation of the general budget.
A student could check organisational charts or official Ministry of Finance documents to compare the roles of Department of Economic Affairs versus Department of Revenue.
Says the budget is prepared by the Budget Division, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, giving a clear rule about which department prepares the budget.
Use this rule to rule out Department of Revenue unless external sources show responsibility transferred or shared.
Describes the procedural role of the Finance Minister in presenting the General Budget and lists main budget documents, implying central coordination in Ministry of Finance.
Combine with knowledge that Finance Minister heads the Ministry of Finance to infer which internal departments likely coordinate budget preparation.
Contains a past exam-style item that explicitly questions whether 'The Department of Revenue is responsible for the preparation of Union Budget', indicating this is a contested or testable claim.
A student could use this as a prompt to verify which department is actually responsible by consulting authoritative sources or the Ministry's organisational responsibilities.
- Explicitly states that 'No money can be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund except under an Appropriation Act'.
- Links withdrawal to the process of demands for grants and parliamentary voting, showing parliamentary control over appropriation.
- Affirms constitutional provision that no money out of the Consolidated Fund shall be appropriated except in accordance with a law of Appropriation (Article reference context).
- Identifies the Appropriation Act mechanism as the legal basis for withdrawals from the Fund.
- States directly that 'no amount can be withdrawn from the Fund without the authorization from the Parliament'.
- Contrasts Consolidated Fund with Contingency Fund (which is for advances pending parliamentary authorization), reinforcing the need for parliamentary sanction for CFI withdrawals.
- Explicitly states disbursements from the Public Account are not subject to a Parliamentary vote.
- Directly distinguishes Public Account moneys from the Consolidated Fund (which require Parliamentary appropriation).
- Identifies the constitutional source (Article 266(2)) that empowers crediting moneys to the Public Account of India.
- Shows the Public Account is constitutionally distinct from the Consolidated Fund, supporting the distinction in authorization rules.
States that the Public Account is operated by executive action and payments from it can be made without parliamentary appropriation.
A student could combine this rule with knowledge of constitutional appropriation clauses to infer that PAI disbursements differ from Consolidated Fund appropriations.
Says receipts into and disbursements out of the Public Account are not subject to vote by Parliament.
Use this to contrast voting/appropriation procedures for the Consolidated Fund versus the Public Account when judging whether prior parliamentary authorization is required.
Explicitly contrasts Contingency Fund (post facto approval required) with Public Account (withdrawal does not require Parliament's approval) and cites Article 266(2).
A student could check Article 266 text and compare procedures for Contingency Fund, Consolidated Fund and Public Account to test the statement.
Explains that parliamentary control over expenditure pivots on the Consolidated Fund (Article 266(3)), implying a special constitutional role for the CFI distinct from other accounts.
Combine this with snippets about the Public Account to deduce that constitutional appropriation rules primarily target the Consolidated Fund, not necessarily the Public Account.
Describes the Committee on Public Accounts scrutinising disbursements and legal availability of monies, indicating parliamentary oversight occurs via audit/scrutiny.
A student could infer that oversight over Public Account spending may be ex post (audit/committee) rather than ex ante (prior authorization), and investigate which applies to PAI.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter disguised as Technical. Solvable via standard Polity/Economy basics (Laxmikanth Ch 22/23 + Vivek Singh).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Financial Administration' themeβspecifically Article 266 (CFI & Public Account) and the organizational structure of the Ministry of Finance.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 6 Departments of MoF: (1) Economic Affairs (Budget), (2) Expenditure, (3) Revenue, (4) Financial Services, (5) DIPAM, (6) Public Enterprises. Contrast the 3 Funds: CFI (Art 266, Parliament Vote), Public Account (Art 266(2), Executive Action, 'Banker' role), Contingency Fund (Art 267, President/Finance Sec, Post-facto approval).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying a process (like the Budget), map the 'Who' and the 'How'. Don't just know the Budget exists; know the *Budget Division* is in DEA. Don't just know Funds exist; know *who holds the key* (Parliament vs. Executive). The examiner loves swapping the 'Authority' (Parliament for Public Account is wrong) and the 'Agency' (Revenue for Budget is wrong).
References explicitly name the Budget Division of the Department of Economic Affairs as the nodal agency that prepares the general/Union budget.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask which ministry/department prepares the budget. This concept links to Ministry of Finance organisational structure and helps eliminate distractors like Department of Revenue. Prepare by memorising the Budget Division β DEA β Ministry of Finance chain and cross-checking with budget documents.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > How is the Budget Prepared by the Government? > p. 119
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > 4.1 Introduction > p. 146
Evidence states the Finance Minister presents the General Budget on the first working day of February (or 1 Feb) and lists main budget documents.
Frequently tested procedural detail: timing, who presents the budget, and key documents (Annual Financial Statement, Demand for Grants, Appropriation Bill, Finance Bill). Useful for both polity and economy mains/CSAT questions; revise by reviewing procedural steps and document names.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > 4.2 Budget Procedure > p. 148
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > How is the Budget Prepared by the Government? > p. 119
References cite Articles (e.g., Articles 265, 266, and Article 112 requirement) and explain that taxes/receipts require Finance Bill and expenditures require Appropriation Bill.
Core for polity-economy overlap: questions probe constitutional provisions governing fiscal powers and budgetary approvals. Master Articles, the distinction between charged and voted expenditure, and the associated bills to answer application-type and static-knowledge questions; integrate with budget procedure study.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > 4.1 Introduction > p. 146
- Macroeconomics (NCERT class XII 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Government Budget and the Economy > 5.1 GOVERNMENT BUDGET β MEANING AND ITS COMPONENTS > p. 66
All references tie withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund to an Appropriation Act and parliamentary procedures.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often test Article 266/appropriation procedure, vote on account, and limits on executive spending. Understanding the Appropriation BillβAct process links finance, Parliament, and executive powers; practise by mapping budget stages and related articles.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Stages in Enactment > p. 254
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 258
References contrast the Contingency Fund (executive imprest, post-facto parliamentary approval) with the Consolidated Fund (requires prior parliamentary authorization).
Frequently examined distinction in polity/finance topics: tests separation of powers in emergency spending and post-facto sanction. Learn definitions, control mechanisms, and examples of use; useful for essays and prelim/static questions.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > Components of Fiscal Policy > p. 83
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > 4.3 Government Accounts > p. 150
Evidence notes that Public Account transactions are operated by executive action and do not require parliamentary appropriation, contrasting with the Consolidated Fund.
Important for distinguishing types of government accounts (CFI, CFI contingency, PAI) in MCQs and mains answers; helps explain where parliamentary control applies. Memorise functions and approval requirements for each account and practice comparing them.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Funds > p. 256
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > Components of Fiscal Policy > p. 83
Multiple references state that the Public Account is operated by the executive and that payments from it can be made without parliamentary appropriation or vote.
High-yield for UPSC: candidates must distinguish funds where Parliament's vote is required versus those operated by the executive. This topic recurs in questions on budgetary control, parliamentary oversight, and financial constitution. Learn by comparing textbook definitions and constitutional provisions; practise fact-based recall and short explanations.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Funds > p. 256
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > 4.3 Government Accounts > p. 151
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > Components of Fiscal Policy > p. 83
The 'Finance Secretary' is not a specific post but is usually the senior-most Secretary among the five departments. However, the 'Budget' is signed by the Secretary of Economic Affairs. Also, the Contingency Fund is held by the Finance Secretary on behalf of the President, not by the President directly.
Logic for Statement 3: The Public Account contains 'other people's money' (Provident Funds, Savings). If the government needed Parliamentary authorization every time a citizen wanted to withdraw their PF or savings, the Parliament would never sleep. Thus, Public Account disbursements *must* be by executive action. This eliminates options B and D immediately.
Mains GS3 (Fiscal Management): The 'Public Account' is often abused for 'Off-Budget Borrowing' (e.g., NSSF loans to FCI). Since it doesn't require Parliamentary vote (Statement 3), governments use it to bypass fiscal deficit targets, weakening Parliamentary oversight (GS2).