Question map
With reference to Union Budget, consider the following statements : 1. The Union Finance Minister on behalf of the Prime Minister lays the Annual Financial Statement before both the Houses of Parliament. 2. At the Union level, no demand for a grant can be made except on the recommendation of the President of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (Statement 2 only).
**Statement 1 is incorrect**: The President of India causes the Annual Financial Statement to be laid before both Houses of Parliament[2], not the Prime Minister. Article 112 explicitly states that the President shall cause to be laid before both Houses of Parliament a statement of the estimated receipts and expenditure[3]. While the Finance Minister physically presents the budget, it is done on behalf of the President, not the Prime Minister.
**Statement 2 is correct**: No demand for a grant shall be made except on the recommendation of the President (Article 113)[4]. This is a constitutional requirement that ensures presidential recommendation for all grant demands. No demand for a grant can be made except on the President's recommendation[5], which is one of the key financial powers of the President.
Therefore, only statement 2 is correct, making option B the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://cms.rajyasabha.nic.in/UploadedFiles/Procedure/RajyaSabhaAtWork/English/826-833/CHAPTER24.pdf
- [2] https://dea.gov.in/files/budget_division_documents/BUDGET_MANUAL_FINAL_15_11_22.pdf
- [3] https://dea.gov.in/files/budget_division_documents/BUDGET_MANUAL_FINAL_15_11_22.pdf
- [4] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Constitutional Provisions > p. 251
- [5] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > Financial Powers > p. 194
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Constitutional Text vs. TV Visuals' trap. While you see the Finance Minister speaking on TV, the Constitution (Art. 112) assigns the duty to the President. Statement 2 is a verbatim lift from Article 113. The question tests if you can distinguish between the 'formal authority' (President) and the 'functional agent' (Minister).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: For India's Union Budget, does the Union Finance Minister, on behalf of the Prime Minister, lay the Annual Financial Statement before both Houses of Parliament?
- Statement 2: In the context of the Union Budget of India, is it true that no demand for any grant can be made in Parliament at the Union level except on the recommendation of the President of India?
- Explicitly states who causes the Annual Financial Statement to be laid before Parliament.
- Identifies the 'annual financial statement' (the Budget) as being laid before both Houses by the President.
- Cites Article 112 and repeats that the President shall cause the Annual Financial Statement to be laid before both Houses.
- Defines the Annual Financial Statement as the Budget, reinforcing that the President is the authority to lay it before Parliament.
- Provides the constitutional text (Article 112) specifying the President's duty to lay the Annual Financial Statement before both Houses.
- Makes clear the formal responsibility rests with the President, not with a Minister or Prime Minister in the quoted text.
States that the President 'shall cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament a statement ...' (the Annual Financial Statement) — identifies the constitutional source (Article 112) for who 'causes' the statement to be laid.
A student could combine this constitutional attribution to the President with knowledge that the President normally acts on aid-and-advice of the Council of Ministers to ask whether a minister (not the PM) practically presents it.
Reiterates that financial business 'starts with the presenting of the Annual Financial Statement' and that it 'is caused to be laid by the President before both Houses' — emphasises the constitutional/formal actor is the President.
Use this formal assignment plus practical parliamentary procedure to probe who physically presents the Statement in each House.
Explains actual parliamentary practice: 'The General Budget is presented in Lok Sabha by the finance minister ... and after the speech it is presented in the Rajya Sabha.'
Combine this practice with the constitutional provision that the President 'causes' the Statement to be laid to infer a distinction between formal (President) and practical (Finance Minister) roles.
FRBM-related text says 'The finance minister shall review ... and place before both Houses of Parliament the outcome of such reviews' and requires several fiscal statements to be laid 'along with the budget document' — showing a statutory role for the Finance Minister in placing fiscal documents before both Houses.
A student could extend this pattern to argue that the Finance Minister routinely performs the tangible act of laying financial statements before Parliament, even if the President is the constitutional source.
States as a general rule that 'a minister is appointed by President only on the advice of Prime Minister' — showing the PM's central role in ministerial appointments and influence over ministers.
A student might combine this with the evidence that the Finance Minister presents the budget to infer whether the Finance Minister acts 'on behalf of' the PM (i.e., as the PM's ministerial agent), noting this is an inference rather than a documented procedural fact in the snippets.
- Explicitly records Article 113 requiring Presidential recommendation before any demand for a grant is made.
- Places the submission of estimates and demands-for-grants within the legislative procedure, tying them to the President's recommendation.
- Lists constitutional provisions for the budget and explicitly includes the rule that no demand for a grant shall be made except on the recommendation of the President (Article 113).
- Presents the provision as a core constitutional requirement in budget enactment.
- In the President's financial powers, explicitly records that no demand for a grant can be made except on the President's recommendation.
- Frames the requirement as part of the enumerated financial powers and functions of the President.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter for Polity veterans; Trap for news-watchers. Source: Laxmikanth Ch 18 (President) & Ch 22 (Parliament).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: 'Financial Procedures in Parliament' (Articles 112–117). Specifically, the executive's exclusive privilege over financial demands.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Presidential Recommendation' list: Money Bills (Art 110), Financial Bills Type I (Art 117(1)), Demands for Grants (Art 113). Contrast this with Financial Bills Type II (Art 117(3)) which need recommendation for 'consideration', not introduction.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Create a 'Who vs. Whom' table for Parliament. Column A: Who formally causes it? (President). Column B: Who physically presents it? (Minister). Column C: Who recommends it? (President). Never conflate the constitutional source with the political face.
The President causes the Annual Financial Statement (the Union Budget) to be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
High-yield constitutional fact: it clarifies the formal/constitutional actor responsible for 'laying' the Budget and links to Article 112. Mastering this prevents confusion between ceremonial/formal powers of the President and the executive actions of ministers; useful in questions on constitutional procedure and separation of powers.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 257
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 258
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > Financial Powers > p. 194
The Finance Minister formally presents the Budget speech and introduces the Budget documents in Lok Sabha and then in Rajya Sabha.
Essential procedural knowledge for UPSC: distinguishes who actually explains and moves budget-related documents in Parliament (Finance Minister) from who formally causes the statement to be laid (President). Useful for questions on parliamentary procedure, the Finance Bill, and money bill processes.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > Procedure of Laying Budget > p. 120
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > 4.2 Budget Procedure > p. 148
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > How is the Budget Prepared by the Government? > p. 119
There is a constitutional act by the President to cause the Annual Financial Statement to be laid, while the Finance Minister presents and discusses the Budget in Parliament.
Conceptual precision that recurs in UPSC mains and prelims: knowing the difference helps answer questions about formal constitutional responsibilities versus practical parliamentary actions; links to topics on President's financial powers and parliamentary debates.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 257
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 258
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 5: Indian Tax Structure and Public Finance > Procedure of Laying Budget > p. 120
Article 113 requires the President's recommendation before any demand for a grant is made in Parliament.
High-yield constitutional provision for budgetary procedure questions; connects to Articles on budget enactment and executive-legislative financial relations. Mastery enables answers on procedural limits, checks on legislative withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund, and related Article-based questions.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 258
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Constitutional Provisions > p. 251
The President's financial powers include recommending money bills, laying the annual financial statement, and recommending demands for grants.
Crucial for questions on separation of powers and executive authority in financial matters; links to topics like money bills, budget presentation, and limitations on Parliament's power over expenditure. Helps answer procedural and polity mains and prelims items.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > Financial Powers > p. 194
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > Financial Powers > p. 194
Voting on demands for grants is the exclusive privilege of the Lok Sabha; Rajya Sabha can only discuss but not vote.
Important for understanding bicameral budgetary roles and the supremacy of Lok Sabha in financial matters; relevant for questions on legislative procedure, checks and balances, and differences between votable and charged expenditure.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Stages in Enactment > p. 253
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Stages in Enactment > p. 253
The 'Excess Grant' (Article 115). While Demands for Grants are voted annually, 'Excess Grants' (money spent beyond the voted amount) must be voted by Lok Sabha *after* the financial year ends, and crucially, they must be scrutinized by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) *before* voting.
The 'Constitutional Nameplate' Hack: In the context of Parliament and formal papers, the phrase 'on behalf of the Prime Minister' is legally suspect. The Constitution vests executive power in the President. Papers are laid by the government, but the *duty* to cause them to be laid is the President's. If you see 'Prime Minister' assigned a formal procedural duty in Parliament (other than leadership of the House), it's likely a trap.
Link this to 'Executive Control over Finance' (GS2 Mains). The rule that 'no demand for a grant can be made except on President's recommendation' prevents private members from making populist demands, ensuring the Executive (which is responsible for finding resources) retains control over the budget deficit.