Question map
What can be the impact of excessive/inappropriate use of nitrogenous fertilizers in agriculture? 1. Proliferation of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in soil can occur. 2. Increase in the acidity of soil can take place. 3. Leaching of nitrate to the groundwater can occur. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option C (statements 2 and 3 only).
**Statement 1 is incorrect**: Excessive nitrogenous fertilizers do not cause proliferation of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms. In fact, excessive use of chemical fertilizers reduces the population of soil-borne organisms[1]. When external nitrogen is abundantly available, nitrogen-fixing organisms have no competitive advantage, so they don't proliferate.
**Statement 2 is correct**: Excessive use of chemical fertilizers made the soil acidic[2], which is why it can be treated with lime, which is a base[2]. This acidification negatively affects plant growth and soil health.
**Statement 3 is correct**: Excess fertilizers may reach the ground water by leaching[3]. This contamination is serious, as high nitrate contamination in groundwater is believed to cause blue baby syndrome, resulting from leaching of nitrate generated from fertilizer used in agricultural lands[4].
Therefore, only statements 2 and 3 are correct impacts of excessive nitrogenous fertilizer use.
Sources- [1] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > iii. Fertilizers and manurest > p. 79
- [2] Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Exploring Substances: Acidic, Basic, and Neutral > 2.3 Neutralisation in Daily Life > p. 18
- [3] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 3) Agricultural sources: > p. 74
- [4] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 29: Environment Issues and Health Effects > d) Blue baby syndrome > p. 416
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Green Revolution fallout' question. Statements 2 and 3 are direct lifts from basic NCERT/Shankar texts on pollution. Statement 1 requires 'Ecological Logic' rather than a specific book line: Nature is efficient; if you provide free nitrogen, microbes stop fixing it energetically. Don't just memorize 'pollution is bad'; understand the biological feedback loops.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does excessive or inappropriate use of nitrogenous fertilizers in agriculture cause an increase (proliferation) of nitrogen‑fixing microorganisms in soil?
- Statement 2: Does excessive or inappropriate use of nitrogenous fertilizers in agriculture lead to increased soil acidity (lower soil pH)?
- Statement 3: Does excessive or inappropriate use of nitrogenous fertilizers in agriculture cause leaching of nitrate into groundwater?
- Explicitly states that reductions in nitrogen inputs can lead to increases in nitrogen‑fixing organisms (implying the opposite—high N inputs do not promote them).
- Gives an example (cyanobacteria) showing nitrogen‑fixers proliferate under lower N availability, which counters the claim that excessive fertiliser increases them.
- Describes nitrogen‑fixing microbes (diazotrophs) as part of systems adapted to nutrient‑poor (low‑N) environments, implying they are associated with low nitrogen availability rather than high.
- Supports the inference that adding excess inorganic N would not promote, and may suppress, diazotroph proliferation.
States that excessive use of chemical fertilizers reduces the population of soil-borne organisms and degrades soil structure.
A student could infer that adding large amounts of inorganic N might suppress or kill some soil microbes (including N-fixers) rather than promote their proliferation, and could check studies comparing microbial abundance under high vs low fertilizer regimes.
Says chemical fertilizers can kill bacteria and other microorganisms, leaving soil less fertile over time.
Combine this with the hypothesis that added N reduces the ecological niche for N-fixing microbes: if fertilizers kill microbes or remove the need for biological N fixation, their numbers may fall rather than rise.
Defines bio-fertilizers as preparations used to increase numbers of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms by deliberate application.
Shows that increases in N-fixer populations are normally achieved by adding live microbes, not by adding inorganic N; students could contrast effects of biofertilizer application versus inorganic N fertilizer on N-fixer abundance.
Explains that microorganisms (bacteria and blue‑green algae) are a primary natural route of nitrogen fixation, distinct from industrial fertilizers.
A student can use this to reason that industrial N addition is a separate source of plant-available N and might reduce selection pressure for biological N fixation, so one would predict less, not more, microbial fixation activity when inorganic N is abundant.
Notes neem-coated urea alters fertilizer behavior and even claims (as an option) increased nitrogen fixation via soil microorganisms when neem oil is released.
This example suggests that fertilizer formulation can affect microbial processes; a student could investigate whether some fertilizer treatments might indirectly favor or disfavor N-fixers (so effects are context-dependent).
- Direct scenario: explicitly states excessive use of chemical fertilisers made the soil acidic in a farmer case study.
- Gives a treatment (lime) for acidic soil, implying a causal link between fertilizer overuse and lowered pH.
- Notes excessive chemical fertilizers alter soil biology and structure and increase salt content, indicating adverse changes to soil chemistry.
- Supports the general idea that overuse of chemical fertilizers causes harmful soil chemical changes (consistent with acidification pathways).
- Defines acid soils as low pH (<6.0) and explains the chemical nature and nutrient consequences of soil acidity.
- Provides context on what ‘increased soil acidity’ means and why it matters for plant nutrition.
- Explicitly states groundwater contamination by leaching of nitrate generated from fertilizer used in agricultural lands.
- Links nitrate contamination in groundwater to a concrete health outcome (blue baby syndrome), showing real-world consequence of leaching.
- Directly says excess fertilizers may reach groundwater by leaching or enter surface waters by runoff and drainage.
- Identifies fertilizers as sources of major plant nutrients including nitrogen, implying nitrogenous fertilizers are involved.
- Explains that soil nitrates are highly soluble in water and can be lost from the soil by transport to groundwater or surface runoff.
- Provides a mechanistic basis (solubility and transport) for how nitrates from soil/fertilizer can move into groundwater.
- [THE VERDICT]: Conceptual Sitter. Statements 2 and 3 are foundational knowledge; Statement 1 is solved by basic biological logic.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Agriculture > Fertilizers > Negative Externalities of the Green Revolution (Soil Health).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Nitrogen Cascade': 1) Water: Eutrophication & Blue Baby Syndrome (Methemoglobinemia). 2) Air: Ammonia volatilization & N2O (Greenhouse gas + Ozone depletion). 3) Soil: Acidity (H+ release during nitrification) & Salinization.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying any agricultural input (Urea, DAP, Pesticides), always map three dimensions: Impact on Soil Chemistry (pH), Impact on Groundwater (Leaching), and Impact on Soil Biology (Microbial diversity). UPSC rarely asks about 'yield'—they ask about the 'cost' to the ecosystem.
Several references state that excessive chemical fertilizers reduce or kill soil microorganisms and degrade soil structure, directly addressing how fertilizer misuse affects microbial populations.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often probe environmental impacts of the Green Revolution and soil health. This concept links agriculture, environment and sustainable development topics, and helps answer questions on soil degradation, policy responses (e.g., organic farming) and mitigation measures. Prepare by studying cause–effect chains (fertilizer → microbial decline → reduced fertility) and policy/technology alternatives.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > iii. Fertilizers and manurest > p. 79
- Economics, Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 1: The Story of Village Palampur > Suggested Activity > p. 6
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 3) Agricultural sources: > p. 74
Understanding what nitrogen fixation is and which organisms perform it is essential to judge whether their populations would increase or decrease under heavy nitrogenous fertilizer use.
Core ecological concept frequently tested in GS papers and prelims. It connects to the nitrogen cycle, biofertilizers, and agricultural practices. Master by learning types of fixation (microbial, industrial, atmospheric), key organisms (Rhizobium, cyanobacteria), and implications for soil fertility and crop choices.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 2: Functions of an Ecosystem > c) The Nitrogen Cycle > p. 19
- FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, Geography Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: Geomorphic Processes > Biological Activity > p. 45
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 25: Agriculture > Bio-fertilizers > p. 364
References describe biofertilisers as preparations to increase numbers of N‑fixing microbes and contrast this with problems from excessive chemical fertilizer use, a distinction central to the statement.
Important for UPSC value‑addition: links sustainable agriculture, policy (promotion of biofertilisers), and environmental pollution. Useful for mains answers on sustainable practices and for framing policy prescriptions. Study definitions, comparative effects, and policy measures (promotion of biofertilisers, neem‑coated urea, organic farming).
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 25: Agriculture > Bio-fertilizers > p. 364
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 11: Agriculture - Part II > Scope of organic farming in India > p. 347
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > iii. Fertilizers and manurest > p. 79
Reference [3] directly links excessive chemical fertilizer use to soil acidification; [1] shows fertilizers alter soil chemistry.
High-yield for environment/agriculture questions—explains a direct anthropogenic cause of soil degradation. Connects to topics on fertilizer management, soil health, and sustainable agriculture. Prepare by memorising common causes, symptoms, and brief evidence-backed remedies.
- Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Exploring Substances: Acidic, Basic, and Neutral > 2.3 Neutralisation in Daily Life > p. 18
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > iii. Fertilizers and manurest > p. 79
Reference [5] defines acid soils and lists chemical consequences (H+, Al3+) and resultant nutrient deficiencies.
Frequently tested in GS and optionals (agriculture/environment): knowing definition, causes and crop impacts helps answer questions on soil health, crop loss and policy (soil management). Study definitions, symptoms, and links to nutrient availability.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 25: Agriculture > Acid soils > p. 368
Reference [3] cites lime (a base) as the remedy for overly acidic soil caused by excess fertilizers.
Practically important for policy and strategy questions on remediation and sustainable practices. Enables answers on mitigation measures and connects to broader topics like sustainable farming and input management. Learn typical remedies and their rationale (neutralisation).
- Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Exploring Substances: Acidic, Basic, and Neutral > 2.3 Neutralisation in Daily Life > p. 18
Multiple references state that excess fertilizers (including nitrogenous ones) can leach into groundwater or be carried by runoff, causing nitrate contamination.
High-yield for environment/GS papers: links agriculture to water pollution and public health. Helps answer questions on causes of groundwater contamination, agricultural impacts, and mitigation policy. Prepare by studying pathways (leaching/runoff), sources (fertilizers), and case examples from syllabus materials.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 29: Environment Issues and Health Effects > d) Blue baby syndrome > p. 416
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 3) Agricultural sources: > p. 74
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 2: Functions of an Ecosystem > s r n r u l z N ,- / & f . -. : : u ' , \ S ACADEMY * d 6 # . , r '' t u f Y l ' ' J * w { d ) / u Y . / > p. 20
Since acidity is the problem (Stmt 2), the 'Shadow Fact' is the solution: Liming (adding Calcium Carbonate) corrects acid soil. Conversely, Gypsum is used to correct Alkaline/Saline soil. Also, look out for 'Nitrification Inhibitors' (like Neem Oil) which slow down the conversion of Urea to Nitrate, reducing leaching.
Apply the 'Evolutionary Efficiency' logic to Statement 1. Nitrogen fixation is an energy-expensive process for microbes. If a farmer dumps ready-made Nitrogen (fertilizer), why would a microbe waste energy fixing it from the air? They wouldn't. Abundance leads to laziness (suppression), not proliferation. Thus, Statement 1 is biologically illogical.
Link this to GS3 Agriculture (Fertilizer Subsidy). The skew in N:P:K ratio (ideal 4:2:1, actual is much higher in N) due to Urea subsidies drives this 'excessive use'. This connects soil science directly to fiscal policy (Nutrient Based Subsidy scheme).