Indira Gandhi Prize for Peace, Disarmament and Development for 2014 was given to which one of the following?

Identifies the Atomic Energy Institute at Trombay as renamed Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) and lists it among India's principal nuclear institutions.

A student could use this to recognize BARC as a major national atomic institution likely to be considered for awards related to nuclear policy or development and then check awardee lists for 2014.

Gives historical fact that the Trombay institute became BARC and situates it as the central atomic research body.

Knowing BARC's central role, one could infer its activities might intersect with peace/disarmament themes and therefore search prize records or announcements mentioning BARC.

Shows BARC personnel (e.g., its Director Raja Ramanna) were directly involved in India's nuclear weapons programme, linking the centre to nuclear policy and technology.

A student might use this to judge whether BARC's work is of the kind (nuclear-related) that an Indira Gandhi Prize for Peace, Disarmament and Development could plausibly recognize, then verify awardee lists.

Describes India's foreign policy stance advocating disarmament and using international forums, which is the thematic domain of the Indira Gandhi Prize (peace, disarmament, development).

This connects the prize's subject matter to national institutions involved in nuclear issues; a student could therefore check if institutions like BARC were ever awarded for contributions to disarmament or peaceful nuclear development in 2014.

Notes India sponsored disarmament initiatives (e.g., Eighteen Nations Disarmament Conference), illustrating governmental engagement with disarmament topics tied to awards in that field.

A student could use this to justify searching official records of peace/disarmament prizes to see if state-linked institutions such as BARC were recipients in 2014.

States Indira Gandhi 'brought attention to the relationship between disarmament and economic development', which defines the thematic link in the prize's title (Peace, Disarmament and Development).

A student could infer that recipients are likely those contributing to disarmament-related policy or development work and check whether IISc's 2014 activities matched that focus.

Identifies the Indian Institute of Science as India's principal scientific research institute, a potential actor in development and technology.

One could check whether IISc had programs or achievements in 2014 that align with 'development' or 'peace/disarmament' aims to judge plausibility of it receiving the prize.

Describes India's foreign policy emphasis on disarmament to promote development, illustrating the national importance of the disarmament–development nexus recognized by the prize.

Use this pattern to reason that institutions advancing disarmament or reducing military expenditure could be prize candidates, then examine IISc's 2014 record for such contributions.

Notes India’s institutional involvement in disarmament (e.g., sponsoring conferences), reinforcing that disarmament is an institutional/policy field which prizes might reward.

A student could look for institutional awardees (not only individuals) in 2014 and see if IISc fits that institutional award pattern.

Notes ISRO's Mars Orbiter Mission (Mangalyaan) reached Mars orbit on Sept 24, 2014, marking a high-profile, low-cost scientific achievement for India.

A student could infer that a major national achievement in 2014 might have made ISRO a candidate for national/international awards that year and then check award lists for 2014.

Describes Mangalyaan as a significant, low-cost scientific milestone that 'showed the world' India could do space science—an accomplishment with development and prestige implications.

Use this to argue ISRO's work had development impact in 2013–14, then look up recipients of development-related prizes in 2014 to see if ISRO appears.

Explains ISRO's institutional status (creation in 1969 and purpose to indigenise space technology), showing it's a national organisation capable of receiving institutional prizes.

A student could combine this with knowledge of prize rules (which often allow organisations) to assess plausibility and then check the 2014 prize recipient list.

States Indira Gandhi 'brought attention' to the relationship between disarmament and economic development, linking her legacy to disarmament and development themes the prize covers.

Since the prize is for 'Peace, Disarmament and Development', a student could use this to justify searching prize archives for recipients whose work relates to development (like ISRO's contributions).

Gives an example of the historical connection between Indira Gandhi's era and India's space programme (Rakesh Sharma flight in 1984), showing a long-standing association between the prize's namesake and space-related milestones.

A student could view this as contextual support for why a space organisation might be considered relevant to an Indira Gandhi–named prize and then verify actual 2014 award records.

States the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) was set up to promote research in mathematics and pure sciences, defining its institutional focus.

A student could use this to judge alignment between TIFR's pure-science research mission and the Indira Gandhi Prize’s stated themes (peace, disarmament, development) to assess plausibility that TIFR would be a typical recipient.

Explicitly references the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research as an item of factual knowledge (establishment date question), confirming TIFR is a notable, named institution in these sources.

A student could take this as confirmation that TIFR is a prominent Indian institute and therefore a plausible candidate for national/international awards, then check a 2014 winners list externally.

Notes Indira Gandhi’s role in linking disarmament and economic development, clarifying the prize’s thematic emphasis on disarmament and development associated with her name.

A student could use this to infer the prize likely rewards contributions related to disarmament/economic development and then test whether TIFR’s activities in 2014 match those themes.

Describes India’s foreign policy emphasis on disarmament and economic development, reinforcing the interpretation of the prize’s scope (disarmament linked to development).

A student could combine this definition of the prize’s topical scope with TIFR’s research remit to assess whether TIFR’s work would fit typical award criteria, before checking award records.

Mentions the year 2014 in a contemporary context (Project Tiger had 44 reserves in 2014), establishing 2014 as a referenced recent year in these materials.

A student can note that 2014 is within the modern period covered by these sources and thus seek the 2014 Indira Gandhi Prize recipient list externally to confirm or refute the statement.