Who amongst the following are members of the Jury to select the recipient of 'Gandhi Peace Prize'? I. The President of India II. The Prime Minister of India III. The Chief Justice of India IV. The Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Select the correct answer using the code given below.

Explains that a Prime Minister may be a member of either House (e.g., some PMs have been Rajya Sabha members), showing the office can be held by persons with varied parliamentary status.

A student could use this to note the PM is an office (not tied to a single house) and then check the Gandhi Peace Prize statute to see if it names the Prime Minister as an ex‑officio jury member.

Describes presidential discretion in appointing the Prime Minister, illustrating the constitutional importance and distinctiveness of the Prime Minister's office.

One might infer that because the PM is a principal constitutional office, some national awards/juries could include such office‑holders—so verify the prize rules for any ex‑officio slots for high offices like the PM.

Same passage as [1] (duplicate source) reinforcing the pattern that the Prime Minister's appointment and status are governed by specific constitutional practices.

Use this repeated emphasis on the PM's special status to motivate checking official Gandhi Peace Prize documentation (government notifications or the prize statute) for named jury members.

States that the President can nominate leaders to the Council of Ministers, highlighting that national appointments and nominations are governed by explicit rules.

A student could contrast this pattern—appointments by explicit rules—with whether the Gandhi Peace Prize specifies jury composition (i.e., look for an explicit nomination rule naming the PM).

Provides context on the Prime Minister as the head of government, underscoring the prominence of the office in national affairs.

Given the PM's prominence, a reasonable next step is to check official sources (prize guidelines, government releases) to see if the PM is included among named jurors for the Gandhi Peace Prize.

Shows a clear pattern where the Chief Justice of India serves ex officio as chairperson of important selection/appointment bodies (the judicial 'Commission' described).

A student could extend this pattern by checking whether the Gandhi Peace Prize jury is defined by statute or government rules and whether such rules typically include ex officio judicial heads.

Gives an example where the Chief Justice chairs a permanent committee (designation of Senior Advocates), indicating CJI is commonly placed in chair/member roles for formal selection panels.

Use this example as a precedent to suspect that other high-profile selection panels (like an award jury) might also include or be chaired by the CJI; then check the specific jury list for the Gandhi Peace Prize.

States the Chief Justice chairs search-cum-selection committees for appointments to national commissions, showing a recurring administrative role in selection committees across government bodies.

A student could take this general rule (CJI often chairs search panels) and look up the statutory/notification text for the Gandhi Peace Prize to see if its jury follows a similar selection-committee pattern.

Repeats that the Chief Justice chairs search/selection committees for tribunals (CAT), reinforcing the pattern of CJI involvement in government selection bodies.

Combine this repeated pattern with a lookup of the Gandhi Peace Prize jury membership (e.g., government notification or official website) to confirm whether the CJI is included.

Gives a clear example that the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha is routinely included as a member of high‑level selection/appointment committees (here, for recommending the Chief Election Commissioner).

A student could note this pattern of inclusion on selection panels and check the statutory/official composition of the Gandhi Peace Prize jury to see if it follows a similar convention.

Repeats the same rule/pattern (Leader of Opposition as a member of a three‑member selection committee) reinforcing that the Leader is commonly treated as an ex officio participant in important selection bodies.

Use this repeated example as support to hypothesize that other national prize juries might likewise include the Leader of the Opposition, then compare with the Gandhi Peace Prize rules.

Defines the Leader of the Opposition as the recognised leader of the largest opposition party in a House, clarifying who holds this statutory/constitutional post when a committee requires 'Leader of the Opposition' representation.

Combine this definition with knowledge of who (if anyone) currently holds the LoP in the Lok Sabha and then check jury composition language that names this officeholder.

Provides the same definitional/pattern information about the Leader of the Opposition, useful for identifying the precise office referenced when selection panels list 'Leader of the Opposition' as a member.

A student could use this to map the title in any statutory roster (e.g., 'Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha') to the actual person who would serve on a jury in a given year.

Notes procedural/recognition rules about when a Leader of the Opposition is formally recognised (mentions a 75‑member threshold as an asserted rule), which affects whether that office exists to be named on committees.

Extend by checking whether, as of 2025, the Lok Sabha has a recognised Leader of the Opposition (i.e., whether any party meets the recognition threshold), since only a recognised LoP would be named on formal juries.