Question map
The Government of India has established NITI Aayog to replace the
Explanation
On January 1, 2015, a Cabinet resolution was passed to replace the Planning Commission with the newly formed NITI Aayog.[3] The Modi Government scrapped the 65-year-old Planning Commission on August 13, 2014, and formally established the NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India) on January 1, 2015, as its successor.[4] NITI Aayog acts as a platform for cooperative federalism and serves as the premier policy think tank of the Government of India, providing directional and policy inputs.[5] Like the Planning Commission, NITI Aayog was created by an executive resolution and is neither a constitutional body nor a statutory body.[4]
The other options are incorrect as the Human Rights Commission, Finance Commission, and Law Commission continue to exist as separate constitutional or statutory bodies serving different purposes.
Sources- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NITI_Aayog
- [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NITI_Aayog
- [3] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Disbanding Planning Commission and Setting up NITI Aayog > p. 779
- [4] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 56: NITI Aayog > ESTABLISHMENT > p. 465
- [5] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 7: Indian Economy after 2014 > 7.1 NITI Aayog > p. 227
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is the definition of a 'Sitter'. In 2015, this was the single biggest governance headline in India. If a major era-defining institution (like the Planning Commission or Railway Budget) is scrapped, it becomes the most predictable question of the year. No deep analysis needed, just headline awareness.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was NITI Aayog established by the Government of India in 2015 to replace the Human Rights Commission?
- Statement 2: Was NITI Aayog established by the Government of India in 2015 to replace the Finance Commission?
- Statement 3: Was NITI Aayog established by the Government of India in 2015 to replace the Law Commission?
- Statement 4: Was NITI Aayog established by the Government of India in 2015 to replace the Planning Commission?
- Explicitly states NITI Aayog was created on 01-January-2015.
- Says NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission, not any human rights body.
- States the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) was set up under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
- Shows NHRC is a separate body established long before 2015, so NITI Aayog did not replace it.
Explicitly states NITI Aayog was established on 1 January 2015 as the successor to the Planning Commission.
A student can use this pattern (successor = Planning Commission) to infer that replacing the Human Rights Commission is unlikely and check which body was actually succeeded.
Again records NITI Aayog (set up 1 January 2015) as replacing the 65-year-old Planning Commission and describes its role as a policy think-tank.
Knowing NITI Aayog’s described role (policy/strategic advice) lets a student compare that with the mandate of the Human Rights Commission to judge whether NITI Aayog could plausibly replace it.
Notes the cabinet scrapped the Planning Commission in 2014 and formed NITI Aayog in Jan 2015 as its replacement.
A student can combine the timeline (Planning Commission scrapped → NITI Aayog formed) with knowledge of the Human Rights Commission’s separate statutory/constitutional status to question the replacement claim.
Contains a multiple-choice style line listing 'replace the Human Rights Commission' among options and contrasts it with 'Planning Commission', indicating exam-style distractors.
This suggests the Human Rights Commission option is a distractor; a student could use exam logic plus the other sources to eliminate the Human Rights Commission option.
States the cabinet passed a resolution to replace the Planning Commission by NITI Aayog and describes NITI Aayog as a policy think-tank involving states in economic policymaking.
A student can extend this by comparing institutional functions (economic planning vs human rights) to assess whether replacement of a human rights body is consistent with the described purpose.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.