Question map
Consider the following : The arrival of Babur into India led to the 1. introduction of gunpowder in the subcontinent 2. introduction of the arch and dome in the region's architecture 3. establishment of Timurid dynasty in the region Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (3 only) because only the third statement is accurate.
Gunpowder was introduced much earlier in the subcontinent, probably in the 13th century by Mongols[1], so Babur's arrival in 1526 did not introduce gunpowder to India. While Babur's victory at Panipat in 1526 relied heavily on gunpowder, field artillery, and matchlock guns, which had recently been introduced in warfare in India[2], the technology itself predated his arrival.
Arch and dome architecture was widely prevalent during the Delhi Sultanate time much earlier than arrival of Babur, who established the Timurid dynasty in India in the 16th century[3]. Therefore, Babur did not introduce these architectural elements.
However, Babur defeated Ibrahim Lodi at Panipat in 1526, which put a final end to the Delhi Sultanate and laid the foundation of the Mughal Empire[2]. As a descendant of Timur, Babur indeed established the Timurid (Mughal) dynasty in India, making statement 3 correct.
Sources- [2] Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Reshaping India’s Political Map > The Mughals > p. 36
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Attribution Trap.' UPSC loves to attribute a technology or art form to the most famous dynasty (Mughals) to test if you know the precursors (Sultanate/Mongols). The strategy is simple: distinguish between 'Introduction' (First appearance) and 'Perfection/Widespread use' (Mughal era).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did the arrival of Babur into India introduce the use of gunpowder weapons in the Indian subcontinent?
- Statement 2: Did Babur's arrival into India introduce architectural elements such as the arch and dome into Indian architecture?
- Statement 3: Did Babur's arrival into India result in the establishment of a Timurid (Mughal) dynasty in the Indian subcontinent?
- Explicitly states gunpowder reached the subcontinent well before Babur, identifying the 13th century Mongols as introducers.
- Directly refutes the claim that Babur's arrival introduced gunpowder weapons to India.
- Explains that Indian ports had active trade links with regions (Europe, Ottoman, Arab world, China, SE Asia) through which knowledge of gunpowder weapons reached India.
- Supports the view that gunpowder technology arrived via trade and contacts before Babur's 16th-century arrival.
- States gunpowder was invented in China well before the medieval period, showing the technology existed long prior to Babur.
- Implies the availability and spread of gunpowder outside China predate Babur's arrival, undermining the claim he introduced it to India.
States Babur's victory at Panipat (1526) 'relied heavily on gunpowder, field artillery, and matchlock guns' and notes these had 'recently been introduced in warfare in India'.
A student could check chronologies of battles and weapon mentions to see whether gunpowder weapons appear in Indian sources shortly before or only around 1526 to judge if Babur's arrival coincides with their introduction.
Describes Babur's effective use of artillery at Panipat and gives a brief origin note that gunpowder was invented in China and reached Europe by the 13th century.
Compare dates of the spread of gunpowder technology westwards (China→Central Asia→Europe) with Babur's movements from Central Asia into India to assess plausible transmission routes.
Explicitly frames Babur's Panipat victory as won 'with the effective use of ... Artillery' in a summary question — reinforcing the association of Babur with artillery use in India.
Use this pedagogical emphasis as a cue to consult primary battle accounts (e.g., Baburnama) and earlier Indian military records to test whether artillery was new at that point.
Says Europeans adopted new methods of warfare in India and that 'Gunpowder and superior artillery played a significant role' in European conquests.
Notes European firearms (muskets and cannons) were superior and that Indian rulers later imported European arms and trainers, suggesting an additional or later source of gunpowder weapons diffusion.
A student could contrast technical descriptions and dates of European vs. Central Asian artillery to determine which source likely brought specific types of gunpowder weapons into Indian armies.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.