Change set
Pick exam & year, then Go.
Question map
'Gadgil Committee Report' and 'Kasturirangan Committee Report', sometimes seen in the news, are related to
Explanation
The Gadgil Committee, or the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP), was set up[1] in 2010 under the leadership of Madhav Gadgil[2], and was assigned the task of examining the ecological status of the Western Ghats and identifying regions to be designated as Eco-Sensitive Zones under the Environment (Protection) Act of 1986[3]. The Kasturirangan Committee, a High Working Group on Western Ghats, was established in August 2012[4] and was formed to review and refine the Gadgil Report[6]. Both the Gadgil and Kasturirangan reports addressed the need to conserve the fragile ecosystem of the Western Ghats[7]. Therefore, both committees are directly related to the protection of the Western Ghats, making option D the correct answer. The other optionsāconstitutional reforms, Ganga Action Plan, and linking of riversāhave no connection to these reports.
SourcesPROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Headline Awareness' question. The controversy regarding Western Ghats notification was a burning issue for 3-4 years (2011ā2015). Strategy: Maintain a 'Committee-Mandate' list for Environment and Polity. If a report triggers state protests, it is high-yield.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
Web source
Presence: 5/5
"The Gadgil Committee was assigned the task of examining the ecological status of the Western Ghats and identifying regions to be designated as Eco-Sensitive Zones under the Environment (Protection) Act of 1986."
Why this source?
- Explicitly states the Gadgil Committee's task was to examine the ecological status of the Western Ghats and identify Eco-Sensitive Zones under the Environment (Protection) Act, indicating an environmental (not constitutional) remit.
- Notes the Kasturirangan Committee was formed to review the Gadgil report, tying both reports to Western Ghats conservation policy rather than constitutional reform.
Web source
Presence: 5/5
"The Gadgil Committee aimed to assess the ecological status of the Western Ghats and recommend areas for designation as Eco-Sensitive Zones... The Kasturirangan Committee was formed to review and refine the Gadgil Report"
Why this source?
- Summarizes the primary goals: Gadgil aimed to assess ecological status and recommend Eco-Sensitive Zones ā clearly environmental objectives.
- States Kasturirangan was formed to review and refine the Gadgil Report, balancing conservation with development, again showing environmental focus.
Web source
Presence: 4/5
"Government of India to constitute another High level working group (HLWG) ... the HLWG submitted its report on 15th April 2013 and had many points of distinction as well as overlap with the Gadgil committee report"
Why this source?
- Describes the Kasturirangan High-Level Working Group as constituted to scrutinise the WGEEP (Gadgil) recommendations, showing both reports address environmental governance of the Western Ghats.
- Mentions public opposition and state-level disputes over implementation, indicating policy and conservation debates rather than constitutional change.
- Explicitly states the Gadgil Committee's task was to examine the ecological status of the Western Ghats and identify Eco-Sensitive Zones under the Environment (Protection) Act, indicating an environmental (not constitutional) remit.
- Notes the Kasturirangan Committee was formed to review the Gadgil report, tying both reports to Western Ghats conservation policy rather than constitutional reform.
- Summarizes the primary goals: Gadgil aimed to assess ecological status and recommend Eco-Sensitive Zones ā clearly environmental objectives.
- States Kasturirangan was formed to review and refine the Gadgil Report, balancing conservation with development, again showing environmental focus.
- Describes the Kasturirangan High-Level Working Group as constituted to scrutinise the WGEEP (Gadgil) recommendations, showing both reports address environmental governance of the Western Ghats.
- Mentions public opposition and state-level disputes over implementation, indicating policy and conservation debates rather than constitutional change.
Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Gadgil Committee > p. 387
Strength: 5/5
āReservation for SCs, STs and Women, ā¢ 6. The Panchayati Raj bodies should have the responsibility of preparing and implementing plans for socio-economic development. For this purpose, a list of subjects should be specified in the constitution. ā¢ 7 The above recommendations of the Gadgil Committee became the basis for drafting an amendment aimed at conferring the constitutional status and protection to the Panchayati Raj in states;ā
Why relevant
States that the Gadgil Committee's recommendations became the basis for drafting an amendment to confer constitutional status and protection to Panchayati Raj.
How to extend
A student could infer that Gadgil's report is connected with constitutional reform by checking whether that drafted amendment was enacted (e.g., the 73rd Amendment) using basic legislative history sources.
Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 39: Panchayati Raj > Table 39.2 Articles Related to Panchayats at a Glance > p. 397
Strength: 4/5
āTable 39,3 Committees Related to Panchay Raj (After Constitutionalisation)
I; Name of the Committee: Task Force on Devolution of Powers and
Functions to Panchayati Raj Institutions; Chairman: Lalit Mathur; Appointed In: 2001; Reported In: 2001
ā¢ 51 No: 2.; Name of the Committee: Expert Group on Planning at the Grassroots Level; Chairman: V. Ramachandran; Appointed In: 2005; Reported In: 2006
ā¢ 51 No: 3.; Name of the Committee: Task Force for Preparation of a Manual for
District Planning; Chairman: Smtā
Why relevant
Lists committees related to Panchayati Raj 'After Constitutionalisation', implying a link between committee work on Panchayats and constitutional provisions.
How to extend
One could compare the committee names/dates with the timeline of constitutional amendments concerning Panchayats to judge connection strength.
Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 15: Centre-State Relations > Rajamannar Committee > p. 158
Strength: 4/5
āIn 1969, the '111 mil Nadu Government (DMK) appointed a three-member committee under the chairmanship of Dr. P. V. Rajamannar to examine the entire question of Centre-state relations and to suggest amendments to the Constitution so as to secure utmost autonomy to the states. The committee submitted its report to the 111 mil Nadu Government in 1971.ā
Why relevant
Describes the Rajamannar Committee set up specifically to 'suggest amendments to the Constitution', showing a pattern that committees are used to recommend constitutional reforms.
How to extend
Use this pattern to treat other named committees (like Kasturirangan) as potentially constitutional-reform-related if their mandate or recommendations concern constitutional subjects.
Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 2: Making of the Constitution > Major Committees > p. 14
Strength: 3/5
āā¢ 1. Union Powers Committee Jawaharlal Nehru
ā¢ 2. Uni on Constitution Committee Jawaharlal Nehru
ā¢ 3. Provi ncial Constitution Committee Sardar Patel
ā¢ 4. Drafting Committee Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
ā¢ 5. Advisory Committee on Fundamental Rights, Minorities and Triba l and Excluded Areas - Sardar Patel. This committee had the following fi ve subcommittees: ā¢ (a) Fundamental Rights Sub-Committee-J.B. KripaJaniā¢ (b) Minorities Sub-Committee H.C. Mukherjeeā¢ (c) North-East Frontier Tribal Areas and Assam Excluded & Partially Excluded Areas Sub-Committee - Gopinath Bardoloiā¢ (d) Excluded and Partially Excluded Areas (other than those in Assam) Sub-Committee - A.V.ā
Why relevant
Lists major committees that framed the Constitution, illustrating the historical role of committees in constitutional-making and amendment processes.
How to extend
Apply this general rule: when a committee's remit touches structural/constitutional subjects, investigate whether it led to formal constitutional change.
Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 2: THE MAKING OF THE CONSTITUTION > p. 19
Strength: 3/5
āThe representatives of Bengal, Punjab, Sind, North Western Frontier Province, Baluchistan and the Sylhet district of Assam (which had joined . Pakistan by a referendum) ceased to be members of the Constituent Assembly of India, and there was a fresh election in the new Provinces of West Bengal and East Punjab. The salient principles of the proposed Constitution had been outlined by various committees of the Assembly such as the Union Constitution Committee, the Union Powers Committee, Fundamental Rights Committee, and, after a general discussion of the reports of these Committees, the Assembly appointed a Drafting Committee on 29 August 1947ā
Why relevant
Explains constituent assembly committees produced reports forming the draft Constitution, reinforcing that committee reports can underpin constitutional text.
How to extend
A student could analogously look for whether a committee report (e.g., Kasturirangan) was cited in later amendment drafts or official legislative debates.
States that the Gadgil Committee's recommendations became the basis for drafting an amendment to confer constitutional status and protection to Panchayati Raj.
A student could infer that Gadgil's report is connected with constitutional reform by checking whether that drafted amendment was enacted (e.g., the 73rd Amendment) using basic legislative history sources.
Lists committees related to Panchayati Raj 'After Constitutionalisation', implying a link between committee work on Panchayats and constitutional provisions.
One could compare the committee names/dates with the timeline of constitutional amendments concerning Panchayats to judge connection strength.
Describes the Rajamannar Committee set up specifically to 'suggest amendments to the Constitution', showing a pattern that committees are used to recommend constitutional reforms.
Use this pattern to treat other named committees (like Kasturirangan) as potentially constitutional-reform-related if their mandate or recommendations concern constitutional subjects.
Lists major committees that framed the Constitution, illustrating the historical role of committees in constitutional-making and amendment processes.
Apply this general rule: when a committee's remit touches structural/constitutional subjects, investigate whether it led to formal constitutional change.
Explains constituent assembly committees produced reports forming the draft Constitution, reinforcing that committee reports can underpin constitutional text.
A student could analogously look for whether a committee report (e.g., Kasturirangan) was cited in later amendment drafts or official legislative debates.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.