'Gadgil Committee Report' and 'Kasturirangan Committee Report', sometimes seen in the news, are related to

States that the Gadgil Committee's recommendations became the basis for drafting an amendment to confer constitutional status and protection to Panchayati Raj.

A student could infer that Gadgil's report is connected with constitutional reform by checking whether that drafted amendment was enacted (e.g., the 73rd Amendment) using basic legislative history sources.

Lists committees related to Panchayati Raj 'After Constitutionalisation', implying a link between committee work on Panchayats and constitutional provisions.

One could compare the committee names/dates with the timeline of constitutional amendments concerning Panchayats to judge connection strength.

Describes the Rajamannar Committee set up specifically to 'suggest amendments to the Constitution', showing a pattern that committees are used to recommend constitutional reforms.

Use this pattern to treat other named committees (like Kasturirangan) as potentially constitutional-reform-related if their mandate or recommendations concern constitutional subjects.

Lists major committees that framed the Constitution, illustrating the historical role of committees in constitutional-making and amendment processes.

Apply this general rule: when a committee's remit touches structural/constitutional subjects, investigate whether it led to formal constitutional change.

Explains constituent assembly committees produced reports forming the draft Constitution, reinforcing that committee reports can underpin constitutional text.

A student could analogously look for whether a committee report (e.g., Kasturirangan) was cited in later amendment drafts or official legislative debates.