Question map
In the context of solving pollution problems, what is/are the advantage/advantages of bioremediation technique ? 1. It is a technique for cleaning up pollution by enhancing the same biodegradation process that occurs in nature. 2. Any contaminant with heavy metals such as cadmium and lead can be readily and completely treated by bioremediation using microorganisms. 3. Genetic engineering can be used to create microorganisms specifically designed for bioremediation. Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is option A (1 only).
Bioremediation is the use of microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) to degrade the environmental contaminants into less toxic forms[1], which confirms that statement 1 is correct as it enhances the natural biodegradation process.
Statement 2 is incorrect because bioremediation is limited to those compounds that are biodegradable, and not all compounds are susceptible to rapid and complete degradation[2]. Heavy metals like cadmium and lead cannot be readily and completely treated through bioremediation as they are not biodegradable in the same way as organic pollutants.
Statement 3 is incorrect as early expectations of solving pollution and many other environmental problems through genetic engineering have conspicuously failed[3]. While genetic engineering techniques exist theoretically, their practical application in creating effective bioremediation microorganisms has not materialized successfully. Therefore, only statement 1 represents a genuine advantage of bioremediation.
Sources- [1] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.I3. BIOREMEDIATION > p. 99
- [2] Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > Disadvantages of bioremediation > p. 101
- [3] https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2015/01/biosafety-and-the-environmental-uses-of-micro-organisms_g1g42b15/9789264213562-en.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question rewards scientific literacy over rote memorization. While S1 and S3 are standard textbook definitions (Shankar IAS), S2 is a logic test: biological enzymes break organic bonds but cannot destroy elemental heavy metals. The strategy is to always check the 'substrate' (organic vs inorganic) when evaluating biological technologies.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: In the context of solving pollution problems, does bioremediation clean up pollution by enhancing the natural biodegradation processes that occur in nature?
- Statement 2: In the context of solving pollution problems, can microbial bioremediation readily and completely treat heavy metal contaminants such as cadmium and lead?
- Statement 3: In the context of solving pollution problems, can genetic engineering be used to create microorganisms specifically designed for bioremediation?
- Defines bioremediation as use of microorganisms to degrade environmental contaminants into less toxic forms.
- States microbes may be indigenous or introduced to the contaminated site, implying enhancement of natural microbial degradation.
- Describes landfarming and biopiles where the goal is to stimulate indigenous biodegradative microorganisms.
- Explicitly states facilitation of aerobic degradation of contaminants — i.e., enhancing natural biodegradation processes.
- Notes bioremediation is limited to compounds that are biodegradable, linking the method specifically to biodegradation processes.
- Mentions biological processes are specific and bioremediation may take longer, reinforcing that it relies on natural microbial activity.
- Directly states that early expectations of solving pollution through genetic engineering (a major route for engineered microbial bioremediation) have 'conspicuously failed'.
- Implies a gap between potential and real-world realization, arguing microbial approaches are not a ready, complete fix for pollution problems.
- Notes the absence of third‑party evaluation of the efficacy of microbial cleaners, indicating a lack of verified, general effectiveness.
- States there are no generally agreed and standardised methods to compare efficacy, which undermines claims that microbial treatments are readily and completely effective.
- Lists multiple specific research studies on cadmium and lead removal (biosorption, strain-specific removal, bioremediation of wastewater), showing treatment is a subject of ongoing, case-specific research rather than an established, universal solution.
- Examples of targeted studies imply applicability is context- and organism-dependent, not a ready complete treatment for all heavy metal contamination.
This snippet explicitly classifies 'salts of heavy metals' as non-biodegradable pollutants, giving a general rule about what microbes can decompose.
A student could combine this with the basic chemical fact that metals/elements cannot be biologically 'degraded' to infer microbes are unlikely to completely remove heavy metals, only alter their form or mobility.
States bioremediation is limited to biodegradable compounds and that not all compounds are susceptible to rapid and complete degradation.
Extend by noting heavy metals are inorganic and often not biodegradable, so microbial treatments may be slow, partial, or targeted to specific transformations rather than complete elimination.
Defines bioremediation as use of microorganisms to 'degrade environmental contaminants into less toxic forms' and lists monitoring parameters for biodegradation.
A student can contrast 'degrade into less toxic forms' (typical for organics) with the expectation for metals (which may be transformed/speciated but not mineralized), suggesting limits for complete removal.
Gives an example where microbes (e.g., 'oilzapper') successfully degrade oil pollutants completely, illustrating that bioremediation works well for certain organic contaminants.
By comparing success with organics (oil) to the classification of heavy metals as non-biodegradable, a student could infer microbes’ proven strengths do not automatically apply to metals like Cd and Pb.
Describes health effects of cadmium and lead and mentions diseases from metal contamination, underlining the significance and persistence of these contaminants.
A student could use this to justify investigating whether bioremediation achieves the stringent removal/immobilization levels needed for safe human and ecological exposure, rather than assuming full remediation.
- Direct historical example: Dr. Ananda Mohan Chakrabarty developed a specially engineered bacterium to break down oil spills.
- His work is cited as showing microorganisms can be used to solve environmental pollution problems and was significant enough to be patented.
- Provides a clear definition of GMO/genetic modification: altering hereditary material artificially (in plants, animals, or microorganisms).
- Establishes the conceptual mechanism (inserting foreign genes) by which microbes could be engineered for new functions such as pollutant degradation.
- Defines bioremediation as use of microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) to degrade contaminants, and notes microbes may be introduced from elsewhere.
- This supports the feasibility of introducing specially prepared (including engineered) microbes to contaminated sites for cleanup.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Solvable by basic elimination of Statement 2 using General Science logic. Source: Shankar IAS (Chapter 5 - Environmental Pollution).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Pollution Control Technologies (Bioremediation, Phytoremediation, Incineration, Pyrolysis).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1. In-situ vs Ex-situ: Bioventing (air to soil), Biosparging (air to water table) vs Landfarming/Biopiles. 2. Phytoremediation terms: Phytoextraction (accumulate in leaves), Phytostabilization (immobilize in soil), Rhizofiltration (roots filter water). 3. Key Microbes: Pseudomonas putida (Superbug), Oilzapper (TERI), Ideonella sakaiensis (plastic-eating). 4. Heavy Metal Diseases: Minamata (Hg), Itai-Itai (Cd), Plumbism (Pb).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When studying a technology, explicitly list its 'Limitations'. Does it work on metals? Is it slow? UPSC flips these limitations into 'Extreme Positive' statements (like S2 claiming 'complete' treatment of 'any' contaminant) to trap you.
Reference definitions identify bioremediation as using microorganisms to break down contaminants, directly answering the statement.
High-yield concept for environment/pollution questions: defines the core remediation approach and distinguishes biological methods from physical/chemical ones. Useful for explaining policy choices, technology comparisons, and case studies; master by memorising definition, typical agents (bacteria, fungi) and examples.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.I3. BIOREMEDIATION > p. 99
Ex-situ techniques explicitly aim to stimulate indigenous microbes and facilitate aerobic degradation — practical ways to 'enhance' natural processes.
Important for questions on remediation methods and waste management; connects theory to applied techniques and operational differences (in‑situ vs ex‑situ). Learn key techniques, objectives, and pros/cons to answer method-comparison and case-based questions.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > bi Ex situ bioremediation techniques > p. 100
Evidence highlights that only biodegradable compounds and specific biological processes are amenable to bioremediation.
Crucial for balanced answers and policy evaluation: explains when bioremediation is appropriate and its constraints. Useful in questions asking trade-offs, implementation challenges or technology selection; prepare by linking limitations to pollutant types and remediation outcomes.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > Disadvantages of bioremediation > p. 101
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.r.r. Classifications > p. 63
Bioremediation acts on biodegradable contaminants, while the references classify heavy‑metal salts as non‑biodegradable.
High-yield for environment questions: distinguishing which pollutants microbes can degrade guides feasible remediation choices. Connects to waste management, pollution control policy and technology questions. Prepare by memorising pollutant classes (organic vs inorganic/heavy metals) and mapping remediation options accordingly.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.I3. BIOREMEDIATION > p. 99
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.r.r. Classifications > p. 63
Sources state bioremediation is limited to biodegradable compounds and is often compound‑specific and slower than other treatments.
Useful for evaluating remediation strategies in UPSC mains and ethics case studies — shows tradeoffs (time, scale, specificity). Link this to questions on technology choice, cost‑effectiveness and field implementation; practise comparing techniques (ex situ vs in situ) using pros/cons.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > Disadvantages of bioremediation > p. 101
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > bi Ex situ bioremediation techniques > p. 100
References highlight heavy metals as persistent pollutants and note their serious health effects (e.g., cadmium itai‑itai, lead neurotoxicity).
Frequently tested in environment and public health contexts — knowing persistence and health outcomes helps argue need for containment, removal, or engineered treatments rather than relying solely on biodegradation. Revise major heavy metals, sources, toxic effects, and appropriate remediation/management options.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.r.r. Classifications > p. 63
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > DO, BOD, COD > p. 76
Bioremediation is defined here as using bacteria/fungi to degrade pollutants and may involve introducing non‑indigenous microbes to sites.
High-yield for environmental science and GS papers: explains a practical pollution-control tool and links to policy (biotech deployment, field application). Questions may ask mechanisms, examples, or advantages/limitations. Prepare by studying definitions, case studies (e.g., oil spill cleanup), and distinctions between in situ/ex situ techniques.
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > 5.I3. BIOREMEDIATION > p. 99
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 5: Environmental Pollution > bi Ex situ bioremediation techniques > p. 100
- Science ,Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: The Invisible Living World: Beyond Our Naked Eye > Be a scientist > p. 20
Mycoremediation (Fungi). Fungi (mycelium) are often more effective than bacteria for breaking down complex hydrocarbons (like lignin or heavy oils) due to extracellular enzymes. Watch for 'Pestalotiopsis microspora' (plastic-eating fungus) as a potential future question.
The 'Elemental Immutability' Rule. Biology works on molecules (organic compounds), not atoms (elements). You can degrade plastic (molecule) into CO2, but you cannot 'degrade' Cadmium (element) into nothingness. It remains Cadmium. Thus, 'completely treated' for heavy metals is scientifically impossible. Eliminate S2.
GS3 Disaster Management & Economy: Bioremediation is the primary sustainable response for Oil Spills (e.g., Ennore spill). It is cost-effective (Economy) but slow. Contrast with Chemical Dispersants (fast but toxic). This trade-off is a perfect Mains discussion point for 'Sustainable Development vs Crisis Management'.