Question map
Which of the following is/are the advantage/advantages of practising drip irrigation? 1. Reduction in weed 2. Reduction in soil salinity 3. Reduction in soil erosion Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option C (1 and 3 only).
Drip irrigation discourages weed growth because water is only delivered where it is needed[1], meaning that areas between plants remain dry and inhospitable to weeds. This targeted water application is a key advantage over conventional irrigation methods that wet entire fields.
Drip irrigation systems can also help reduce soil erosion[2] since water is applied slowly at low rates directly to the root zone, preventing the surface runoff and water flow that causes erosion in flood or surface irrigation systems.
However, statement 2 is incorrect. Drip irrigation does not reduce soil salinity; in fact, it requires careful salinity management. Since water is applied close to plants so that only part of the soil in which the roots grow is wetted[3], salts can accumulate in areas where water does not reach. The precise water application actually necessitates careful monitoring and leaching to prevent salt buildup in the root zone.
Therefore, only statements 1 and 3 are advantages of drip irrigation, making option C the correct answer.
Sources- [1] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 11: Irrigation in India > Advantages: > p. 364
- [3] Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 11: Agriculture - Part II > 2. Drip/Trickle/Micro/Localized Irrigation > p. 334
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question rewards 'mechanistic visualization' over rote memorization. While books list advantages, the key was to visualize the water flow: Drip = localized wetness. This logically confirms weed reduction (dry inter-rows) and erosion control (no runoff), but exposes the trap in salinity (no flushing action).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does practicing drip irrigation reduce weed growth or weed infestation compared to conventional irrigation methods?
- Statement 2: Does practicing drip irrigation reduce soil salinity or help manage soil salinity in irrigated fields?
- Statement 3: Does practicing drip irrigation reduce soil erosion compared to conventional surface or flood irrigation methods?
- Explicitly states drip irrigation 'discourages weed growth because water is only delivered where it is needed.'
- Links the delivery pattern of drip systems directly to reduced weed establishment.
- Describes that drip irrigates only part of the soil (wets root zone) unlike surface/sprinkler which wets the whole soil profile.
- Provides the mechanistic basis: limited wetted soil area reduces moisture available for non-crop (weed) growth.
- Defines drip (trickle) irrigation and emphasizes water is applied close to plants so only part of the soil is wetted.
- Supports the inference that reduced overall soil wetting lowers habitat for weeds compared with methods wetting the entire soil surface.
Shows that irrigation (canals/canals water) may reduce soil salinity in deserts by supplying water that dilutes/leaches salts and improves aeration.
A student can contrast the leaching effect described here with the much smaller wetted volume of drip systems to judge whether drip provides enough water to flush salts.
Defines drip irrigation as wetting only part of the soil profile (root zone) with frequent low-volume applications.
Using the fact that drip wets a limited soil volume, a student can infer that drip may not produce the large downward water flux needed to leach salts from deeper layers unless supplemented by other measures.
Lists 'Salinity hazards' under issues associated with drip/trickle irrigation, implying drip can be linked to salinity problems in some contexts.
A student could combine this warning with knowledge of local salt sources (saline groundwater, high evaporation) to assess risk that drip will concentrate salts near emitters or fail to remove them.
Explains that salinisation often results where evaporation exceeds precipitation and in canal-irrigated areas due to rising groundwater and capillary salt accumulation.
A student can apply this mechanism to evaluate whether a low-volume, localized irrigation regime (drip) would reduce capillary rise and salt deposition or instead allow salts to accumulate in the root zone.
Presents an exam item that treats 'reduction in soil salinity' as a proposed advantage of drip irrigation (among other options), indicating this is a debated or taught point.
A student could use this as a prompt to look for conditions (soil type, salt load, depth to water table) under which textbooks or exam guides consider that drip reduces salinity vs. when it does not.
- Directly states that drip irrigation can reduce soil erosion.
- Also links reduced erosion with limiting run-off of fertilizers and pesticides, implying less surface movement of water/soil compared to other methods.
- Identifies soil erosion as a specific issue to be avoided in surface irrigation practice.
- By highlighting soil erosion as a concern for surface methods, it provides context that alternatives (e.g., systems that avoid surface runoff) can address erosion.
States drip irrigation wets only the root zone rather than the whole soil profile, contrasting it with surface/flood irrigation.
A student could combine this with the basic fact that less surface wetting reduces surface runoff and hence likely reduces runoff-driven soil erosion on many slopes.
Describes micro‑irrigation (including drip) as applying low volumes frequently under the root zone and as aiding soil health and preventing waterlogging.
One can infer that by avoiding over‑saturation and ponding (which can cause soil detachment), drip may lower erosion risks compared with methods that cause waterlogging.
Notes drip irrigation is adaptable to farmable slopes and suitable for most soils, with water supplied directly near roots via slow release emitters.
Using basic terrain knowledge (slopes are prone to runoff/erosion under heavy surface flow), a student could reason drip's slow, localized application should generate less erosive surface flow on slopes than flood methods.
Explains the basin (a surface irrigation) method can reduce wastage of water and soil erosion, showing that irrigation method influences erosion outcomes.
This example provides a pattern: choice/design of irrigation method affects erosion; by analogy, a method that minimizes surface flow (drip) could similarly reduce erosion relative to other surface methods.
Presents a practice‑question listing 'reduction in soil erosion' among proposed advantages of practicing drip irrigation (as an item to evaluate).
Although not an explicit endorsement, a student could take this as an indication that textbooks associate erosion outcomes with drip and then seek basic hydrological reasoning or local data to judge the claim.
- [THE VERDICT]: Conceptual Trap. Statement 2 is the 'scientific counter-intuitive' point that separates generalists from specialists. Source: Standard Economy/Geography texts (Singhania/NCERT).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Agriculture > Irrigation Methods > Micro-Irrigation (PMKSY). The shift from 'Flood' to 'Precision' farming.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: 1. Fertigation (Nutrient efficiency via drip). 2. Sub-surface drip (Zero evaporation). 3. Sprinkler limitations (High wind drift, leaf burn). 4. Salt Ring Effect (Salts accumulate at the edge of the wetted bulb in drip). 5. Clogging (Algae/sediment sensitivity).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Don't just memorize 'Drip is good.' Ask 'Where does the water go?' If water doesn't touch the inter-row soil, weeds can't grow (St 1). If water doesn't flow over the surface, soil can't erode (St 3). If water isn't in excess, salts aren't flushed down (St 2 false).
References show drip systems wet only the root zone while surface/sprinkler wet the whole soil profile — the core mechanism reducing weed-friendly moisture.
High-yield for questions on irrigation impacts: explains how irrigation method alters soil moisture distribution, weed dynamics, evaporation and disease risk. Connects agriculture technology to crop management and resource efficiency. Master by comparing mechanisms and outcomes across irrigation types and using example crops/contexts.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 11: Agriculture - Part II > 2. Drip/Trickle/Micro/Localized Irrigation > p. 334
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 25: Agriculture > Drip irrigation: > p. 366
Evidence directly lists weed discouragement, reduced evaporation and fewer water-contact diseases as benefits of drip irrigation.
Frequently tested in GS and environment sections when evaluating micro-irrigation policy and schemes. Helps frame balanced answers on technology benefits and trade-offs. Prepare by memorizing key advantages and linking them to schemes/policy and sustainability goals.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 11: Irrigation in India > Advantages: > p. 364
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 12: Major Crops and Cropping Patterns in India > Other Methods of Irrigation > p. 73
References note practical limitations (high initial cost, clogging, need for maintenance) that affect adoption despite agronomic benefits like weed reduction.
Essential for analytical answers on adoption barriers and policy measures (subsidy, maintenance training). Enables balanced evaluation questions and policy recommendations. Study by listing common technical/economic constraints and matching remedies (maintenance, design improvements).
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 12: Major Crops and Cropping Patterns in India > Other Methods of Irrigation > p. 73
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 11: Agriculture - Part II > 2. Drip/Trickle/Micro/Localized Irrigation > p. 334
Drip irrigation wets only the root zone while surface/sprinkler irrigation wets the whole soil profile — this difference affects salt movement, leaching and local accumulation.
High-yield for UPSC geography/agriculture questions: understanding how irrigation methods change soil moisture distribution helps predict salinization or leaching outcomes. Connects to topics on irrigation technology, crop choice and soil management. Learn by comparing method descriptions and their hydrological impacts; use diagrammatic practice and case comparisons (drip vs surface).
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 11: Agriculture - Part II > 2. Drip/Trickle/Micro/Localized Irrigation > p. 334
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 25: Agriculture > Drip irrigation: > p. 366
References attribute salinization to rising groundwater, capillary upward movement and intensive/canal irrigation practices — these are the primary processes producing salt-affected soils in irrigated lands.
Core concept for questions on land degradation and irrigation impacts. Frequently tested in mains and prelims in both static and applied formats; links to water management, groundwater depletion and crop impacts. Study by mapping processes (evaporation > capillary rise > salt deposition) and regional examples.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 6: Soils > iv) Saline and Alkaline Soils > p. 19
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Land Resources and Agriculture > Degradation of Cultivable Land > p. 39
- INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: Water Resources > Water Resources of India > p. 44
Evidence shows general irrigation (canal flushing) can reduce surface salinity in some contexts, while drip irrigation documentation lists 'salinity hazards' as a disadvantage—so irrigation can both mitigate and cause salinity depending on method and context.
Important nuance for UPSC answers: policies/technologies can have context-dependent outcomes. Useful for balanced answer-writing on irrigation policy and land degradation. Prepare by contrasting mitigation (flushing, drainage) with method-specific risks (reduced leaching in localized irrigation); practice case-based arguments.
- Certificate Physical and Human Geography , GC Leong (Oxford University press 3rd ed.) > Chapter 26: Agriculture > Soil Conservation and Sound Farming Techniques > p. 245
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 11: Irrigation in India > Disadvantages: > p. 364
Multiple references describe drip/micro‑irrigation as delivering water at low rates directly to root zones, wetting only part of the soil and saving large amounts of water — core technical differences from surface/flood systems.
High‑yield for irrigation questions: explains how application method determines soil moisture distribution, water efficiency and management needs. Links to topics on agricultural technology, resource efficiency and crop suitability. Learn definitions, mechanism (emitters, low flow rates), advantages/limitations and crop types to answer comparative and policy questions.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 11: Agriculture - Part II > 2. Drip/Trickle/Micro/Localized Irrigation > p. 334
- Environment, Shankar IAS Acedemy .(ed 10th) > Chapter 25: Agriculture > Drip irrigation: > p. 366
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 11: Irrigation in India > 4. Micro-Irrigation > p. 363
The 'Salt Ring' Phenomenon: In drip irrigation, salts are pushed to the outer edge of the wetted soil bulb. A future statement might be: 'Drip irrigation can lead to salt accumulation at the periphery of the root zone.' (True).
Apply the 'Physics of Cleaning': To reduce salinity (clean the soil), you need to *wash* it (leaching), which requires *excess* water. Drip is defined by *minimal* water. Therefore, Drip cannot physically 'wash' the soil. Statement 2 is logically inconsistent with the definition of Drip.
Mains GS-3 (Land Degradation): Link this to 'Desertification'. Canal irrigation causes salinity via capillary rise (waterlogging), while Drip prevents waterlogging but fails to leach existing salts. Both require distinct management for Land Degradation Neutrality.