Question map
With reference to the difference between the culture of Rigvedic Aryans and Indus Valley people, which of the following statements is/are correct ? 1. Rigvedic Aryans used the coat of mail and helmet in warfare whereas the people of Indus Valley Civilization did not leave any evidence of using them. 2. Rigvedic Aryans knew gold, silver and copper whereas Indus Valley people knew only copper and iron. 3. Rigvedic Aryans had domesticated the horse whereas there is no evidence of Indus Valley people having been aware of this animal. Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is option C (statements 1 and 3 only).
**Statement 1 is correct**: While the sources provided don't directly address armor usage, the Rigvedic Aryans used chariots with spoked wheels and used bows and arrows[1], indicating advanced warfare technology. There is no archaeological evidence of the Indus Valley people using coats of mail or helmets in warfare.
**Statement 2 is incorrect**: This statement contains a factual error about the metals known to each civilization. The Harappans made beads and ornaments from metals like copper, bronze and gold[2], and they knew how to use metals like copper and gold, using these metals to make various objects, from utensils to jewellery[3]. Additionally, while there is no proven evidence for smelted iron in the Indus Valley civilization, iron ore and iron items have been unearthed in eight Indus Valley sites[4]. The Rigvedic Aryans also knew multiple metals but crucially, there is hardly any evidence of the Harappans using iron[3], contradicting the statement's claim that Indus Valley people knew iron.
**Statement 3 is correct**: From the Vedas it is evident that Aryans used domesticated horses and chariots[1], while there is no evidence for horse in the Harappan culture[5].
Sources- [1] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 2: Early India: The Chalcolithic, Megalithic, Iron Age and Vedic Cultures > The Aryans > p. 22
- [2] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Early India: From the Beginnings to the Indus Civilisation > Craft Production > p. 11
- [3] Science-Class VII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: The World of Metals and Non-metals > The impact of iron on the progress of civilisation of India > p. 44
- [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_metallurgy_in_the_Indian_subcontinent
- [5] History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 2: Early India: The Chalcolithic, Megalithic, Iron Age and Vedic Cultures > The Aryans > p. 23
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Comparative History' question sourced directly from Old NCERT (R.S. Sharma). While Statement 1 (armour) seems obscure, Statement 2 contains a fatal chronological error (Iron in Harappa) that makes the question solvable via elimination. It tests your grasp of the 'Technological Divide' (Bronze Age vs Iron Age).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is there historical or archaeological evidence that Rigvedic Aryans used coats of mail (mail armor) and helmets in warfare?
- Statement 2: Is there archaeological evidence that the Indus Valley Civilization used coats of mail (mail armor) or helmets?
- Statement 3: Which metals were known to and used by the Rigvedic Aryans (evidence for gold, silver, copper)?
- Statement 4: Which metals were known to and used in the Indus Valley Civilization (evidence for copper, bronze, gold, silver, iron)?
- Statement 5: Did Rigvedic Aryans domesticate and use horses according to textual and archaeological evidence?
- Statement 6: Is there archaeological evidence that the Indus Valley Civilization had domestic horses or were aware of horses?
States the Rigveda records Aryans using domesticated horses, chariots, and bows and arrows — showing organized battlefield practices and mobile warfare.
A student could use this to ask whether contemporaneous chariot-war cultures possessed metal armour/helmets and then look for archaeological finds or metallurgical evidence from the same period/region.
Mentions fortress (pur) and Indra as 'fort-destroyer' — indicating sieges/fortified warfare in Rigvedic imagery.
One could investigate whether cultures that built fortifications in the subcontinent used heavy personal armour (mail/helmets) and search excavations of fort sites for metal armour fragments.
Refers to chiefs with many forts or settlements and troops — implying organized military forces that might deploy protective equipment.
A student might compare the scale of troops described with archaeological expectations for metal-armour use and then examine burial or battle-site finds for armour components.
Notes tribal conflicts and cattle-centered clashes among Vedic peoples — evidence of recurrent warfare as a social pattern.
From the prevalence of conflict, one can reasonably ask whether technology (metalworking) advanced enough in the region to produce mail/helmets and then seek metallurgical/archaeological confirmation.
Identifies 'warriors' as a distinct social category in the Rigvedic period, implying an institutional role that could be equipped with specialized weapons or protection.
Use the existence of a warrior class to justify targeted searches in archaeological reports and Rigvedic vocabulary for terms denoting armor/helms to test for evidence.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.