Question map
With reference to the Parliament of India, consider the following statements : 1. A private member's bill is a bill presented by a Member of Parliament who is not elected but only nominated by the President of India. 2. Recently, a private member's bill has been passed in the Parliament of India for the first time in its history. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option D - Neither 1 nor 2.
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** A private member's bill is presented by any member of parliament who is not a[1] member of[2] the cabinet (executive), or in other words, a lawmaker who is not a minister. It has nothing to do with whether the member is elected or nominated by the President. Both elected and nominated MPs who are not ministers can introduce private member bills.
**Statement 2 is incorrect:** The statement claims that "recently" a private member's bill was passed for the "first time" in Parliament's history. This is false because the Muslim Wakf Bill was the first private member legislation to be passed in Parliament in 1952[3]. Furthermore, during the first Lok Sabha term (1952-57), seven bills brought by private members became laws[4]. Therefore, private member bills were passed decades ago, not recently, and 1952 marked the first instance, not any recent date.
Since both statements are incorrect, the answer is option D.
Sources- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_member%27s_bill
- [2] https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/ht-explainer-what-are-private-member-resolutions-and-bills-101722842895486.html
- [3] https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/ht-explainer-what-are-private-member-resolutions-and-bills-101722842895486.html
- [4] https://prsindia.org/articles-by-prs-team/fridays-in-parliament-are-graveyard-of-ideas-even-under-modi-govt
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewA classic 'Static-Current Hybrid'. The buzz was around the Transgender Persons Bill (2014) passing in Rajya Sabha (first time in 45 years), but UPSC twisted this into a static history check ('first time in history'). Statement 1 is a fundamental definition found in Chapter 22 of Laxmikanth. If you knew the basic definition and the fact that 14 private bills passed before 1970, this was a sitter.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Defines a private member's bill as introduced by a member of parliament (MP) who is not a member of the cabinet (executive).
- This ties the meaning of 'private member' to ministerial/cabinet status, not to being unelected or presidentially nominated.
- Explicitly states that a private member or a lawmaker who is not a minister can bring a resolution or a bill in India.
- Again identifies 'not a minister' as the qualifying characteristic for a private member, not nomination by the President.
- Discusses Private Member Bills in the Indian parliamentary context under the heading 'Non-minister MP’s power'.
- Indicates Private Member Bills are associated with non-minister MPs, not with MPs who are merely presidentially nominated.
Gives a general rule: a 'Private Bill' is introduced by any member of Parliament other than a minister.
A student can combine this with the fact that 'member of Parliament' normally includes both elected and nominated MPs to test whether nominated-only MPs would fit this definition.
States plainly that when a non-minister proposes a bill, it is called a private member's Bill (contrasting it with a Government Bill introduced by a minister).
Use the definition of 'non-minister' and the formal categories of MPs (elected vs nominated) to assess whether 'non-elected but nominated' persons are encompassed.
Repeats the table-style rule: private bills are introduced by any MP other than a minister and do not reflect government policy.
A student can check whether nominated members are legally 'members of Parliament' for introduction rights to see if they can introduce private member's bills.
Distinguishes ordinary bills (which can be introduced either by a minister or by a private member) from money bills (only by a minister).
This lets a student narrow the enquiry to ordinary/private member bills and then look up whether nominated MPs are permitted to introduce ordinary bills.
Notes that a bill may be introduced in either House by a member of the House (though often by a minister), reinforcing that 'member' is the operative term for who can introduce bills.
A student could combine this with constitutional/Parliamentary definitions of 'member of the House' (elected vs nominated) to evaluate the statement.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.