Question map
Out of the following statements, choose the one that brings out the principle underlying the Cabinet form of Government :
Explanation
The fundamental principle underlying the working of parliamentary system of government is the principle of collective responsibility.[1] Parliamentary democracy in most countries is often known as the Cabinet form of government.[2] Article 75 clearly states that the council of ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha. This means that all the ministers own joint responsibility to the Lok Sabha for all their acts of omission and commission.[1] The parliamentary government is also known as 'responsible government' because the cabinet (the real executive) is accountable to Parliament and stays in office so long as it enjoys the latter's confidence.[3] Therefore, option C correctly identifies the core principle: the Cabinet form ensures collective responsibility of the government to the people through their elected representatives in Parliament. The other options describe incidental features or consequences but do not capture the foundational principle of collective accountability that defines the Cabinet system.
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 21: Central Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 215
- [2] Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS > Prime Minister and C er and Cer Council of Ministers > p. 65
- [3] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 13: Parliamentary System > CHAPle > p. 131
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Definition/Principle' question directly from standard texts (Laxmikanth/NCERT). The trap lies in confusing 'functional benefits' (speed, minimizing criticism) with the 'constitutional essence' (accountability). Always prioritize the democratic rationale over administrative utility.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the principle underlying the Cabinet form of government that it is an arrangement for minimizing criticism against the government whose responsibilities are complex and hard to carry out to the satisfaction of all?
- Statement 2: Is the principle underlying the Cabinet form of government that it is a mechanism for speeding up the activities of the government whose responsibilities are increasing day by day?
- Statement 3: Is the principle underlying the Cabinet form of government that it is a mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the government to the people?
- Statement 4: Is the principle underlying the Cabinet form of government that it is a device for strengthening the hands of the head of the government whose hold over the people is in a state of decline?
- Explicitly states that the cabinet's role makes it hard for voters to assign responsibility for government failures, which implies diffusion of blame and reduced individual criticism.
- Links cabinet structure to electoral difficulty in holding a single actor accountable for complex policy failures.
- Describes incentives that encourage the head of government to form a collective cabinet, indicating a purpose of making decisions collectively rather than by a single individual.
- Collective decision-making by a cabinet can dilute individual responsibility and thereby reduce focused criticism.
States that the fundamental principle of the parliamentary/cabinet system is collective responsibility: ministers share joint responsibility for acts of omission and commission.
A student could infer that collective responsibility discourages public dissent among ministers, which might reduce visible criticism of the government's actions when tasks are complex.
Explains that cabinet decisions bind all ministers and it is their duty to stand by Cabinet decisions both inside and outside the legislature.
Combine with the idea that binding solidarity channels disagreements internally, suggesting the Cabinet form limits public criticism even when policies are difficult to satisfy all groups.
Notes that decisions are taken in Cabinet meetings because it is impractical for all ministers to meet regularly; the Cabinet works as a team and ministers must 'own up' to every decision.
A student might extend this to argue that team-based decision-making institutionalizes internal resolution of conflicts, thereby minimizing external criticism.
States Parliament's critical function is to discuss and criticize Cabinet policy so the Cabinet can learn about errors and the nation can hear alternative views.
Using this, a student could contrast Cabinet-internal suppression of dissent (collective responsibility) with Parliament's role as the external forum for criticism, testing whether cabinet form minimizes visible criticism or merely shifts it to the legislature.
Points out that in parliamentary systems the cabinet fuses legislative and executive roles and remarks that ministers are 'not experts' (government by amateurs), implying limits in administrative efficiency.
A student could combine the idea of ministersβ limited expertise with collective responsibility to argue that complex responsibilities might produce errors yet be publicly defended by the united Cabinet β potentially reducing public admission of faults.
- Explicitly states that decisions are taken in Cabinet meetings because it is impractical for all ministers to meet regularly β implying concentration of decision-making for practicality/efficiency.
- Directly links this practicality to why parliamentary democracy is called the Cabinet form of government, supporting the claim that Cabinet form speeds up government functioning.
- Describes the cabinet as the 'nucleus of power' and the real executive, indicating centralized decision-making.
- Centralization of executive authority in the cabinet is consistent with enabling quicker, coordinated action compared with dispersed full-ministry deliberation.
- Explicitly states that the fundamental principle underlying the parliamentary system is collective responsibility.
- Mentions Article 75: council of ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha (the people's representatives).
- Describes collective responsibility as the bedrock principle of parliamentary government.
- Explains the practical enforcement: Lok Sabha can remove the ministry by passing a vote of no confidence, linking the cabinet to accountability.
- Defines the parliamentary system as one where the executive is responsible to the legislature and equates parliamentary government with 'cabinet government' or 'responsible government'.
- Connects the cabinet form with executive responsibility to elected legislative bodies (indirectly to the people).
- Explains that cabinet offices can rely on the head of government to mobilize the administration, enabling small cabinet staffs to enforce rules.
- Shows cabinet structures are used to bind ministers and hold the line β a mechanism that strengthens the head's control over government business.
- Describes the cabinet office's 'filtering and gatekeeper functions' as distinct from the head of government's political planning β implying a role in controlling access and decisions.
- Gatekeeping and filtering concentrate control around the centre, supporting the head's authority within government.
- States that cabinet members are 'individually and collectively answerable ... to the head of government', indicating the cabinet's accountability strengthens the head's position.
- Collective answerability centralizes responsibility and supports the head's ability to direct government action.
Describes the cabinet as the 'real centre of authority' and the highest decisionβmaking body β a general rule about where executive power lies in cabinet systems.
A student could combine this with knowledge of a weakened leader to ask whether concentrating authority in the cabinet can compensate for a leader's reduced personal following.
Explains the Prime Minister chairs and coordinates the Cabinet and that PMial powers have grown β showing the head of government can use the cabinet as an instrument of leadership.
Using this, a student could infer that an empowered PM might rely on cabinet mechanisms to bolster leadership when direct popular support wanes.
States the cabinet is the real executive and is accountable to Parliament (responsible government) β a constraint and source of legitimacy for executive action.
A student could weigh whether cabinet reliance is more about parliamentary confidence (legitimacy) than about shoring up a declining personal hold.
Notes in the Japanese example that the Prime Minister is head of government and appoints ministers, illustrating the cabinet as an instrument of the PM.
By comparing systems (e.g., where PM appoints ministers), a student could assess whether appointment power lets a PM reinforce authority via loyal ministers when personal popularity falls.
Explains Parliament's function of providing the Cabinet and holding it responsible β emphasizing that cabinet authority derives from legislative majority, not solely from the head's personal standing.
A student could use this to test whether cabinet strength compensates for a weak head only when the head retains parliamentary support (majority), otherwise it won't bolster a declining personal hold.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Direct hit from Laxmikanth (Chapter: Parliamentary System) or NCERT Class IX (Working of Institutions).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Parliamentary vs. Presidential' debate. Specifically, the trade-off between Accountability (Parliamentary) and Stability (Presidential).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the specific distinctions: 1) Collective Responsibility (Art 75) vs Individual Responsibility (Pleasure of President). 2) 'Cabinet' word origin (inserted in Art 352 by 44th Amendment, 1978). 3) Kitchen Cabinet vs Shadow Cabinet (UK concept). 4) Rule 198 (No-Confidence Motion).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When UPSC asks for the 'Underlying Principle', they want the Constitutional/Democratic justification, not the administrative outcome. Options A, B, and D are administrative outcomes (speed, defense, strength). Option C is the democratic justification (Accountability).
Multiple references state that the fundamental principle of parliamentary/cabinet government is collective responsibility, where all ministers share joint responsibility and must stand by cabinet decisions.
High-yield for UPSC: explains cabinet unity, accountability to legislature, and the mechanics of ministerial responsibility. Connects to topics on confidence, dissolution, and cabinet discipline; useful for questions on executive-legislative relations and causes of government stability/instability.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 331
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 332
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 331
References describe the parliamentary government as the 'cabinet system' or 'Westminster model' with the cabinet as the centre of executive and legislative leadership.
High-yield: helps distinguish parliamentary and presidential systems, understand fusion of powers and implications for separation of powers. Useful for comparative constitutional questions and essays on forms of government.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 13: Parliamentary System > CHAPle > p. 131
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 13: Parliamentary System > CHAPle > p. 131
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 13: Parliamentary System > FEATURES OF PRESIDENTIAL GOVERNMENT > p. 134
Evidence highlights Parliament's role in discussing and criticizing cabinet policy so that the cabinet remains 'responsible' and can learn its errorsβthe system emphasizes scrutiny rather than minimizing criticism.
Important for UPSC: frames questions on accountability mechanisms (debate, question hour, parliamentary oversight) and assesses claims about motivations behind institutional design. Enables argumentation on whether cabinet seeks to avoid or face criticism.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > THE UNION LEGISLATURE . > p. 241
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS > Prime Minister and C er and Cer Council of Ministers > p. 65
The references identify collective responsibility as a fundamental principle of the parliamentary/cabinet system (ministers share joint responsibility).
High-yield for UPSC: this is a core feature used to distinguish parliamentary systems from presidential systems; it connects to questions on accountability, cabinet stability, and motion of no-confidence. Master by linking textual definitions with examples (e.g., ministerial resignations, collective decisions).
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 331
Multiple references describe the cabinet as the real executive and 'responsible government', highlighting its central role in decision-making.
Crucial for answering polity questions on executive-legislative relations, features of parliamentary system, and contrasts with presidential systems. Helps frame answers about where authority lies, accountability mechanisms, and reasons for cabinet dominance.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 13: Parliamentary System > CHAPle > p. 131
A reference explicitly justifies the Cabinet form on grounds of practicality β decisions are taken in Cabinet because all ministers cannot meet regularly.
Useful for evaluative/analytical questions (e.g., merits/demerits of cabinet system); links institutional design to administrative efficiency. Candidates should use this to argue why cabinet form may speed up governance while balancing it against principles like collective responsibility.
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS > Prime Minister and C er and Cer Council of Ministers > p. 65
Central notion in the references: cabinet ministers act as a team and are jointly responsible to the legislature.
High-yield for UPSC polity questions β explains why cabinets are bound to unified positions and why ministers must resign if they cannot defend decisions. Links to questions on cabinet discipline, ministerial responsibility, and constitutional provisions (Articles 75/64). Master by memorising definition, constitutional citations, and practical implications.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 21: Central Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 215
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 331
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 21: Central Council of Ministers > Collective Responsibility > p. 216
The term 'Cabinet' was NOT in the original Constitution. It was inserted only in Article 352 by the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act (1978) to ensure the PM cannot declare Emergency unilaterally without the written recommendation of the Cabinet.
Apply the 'Democratic Core' filter. Options A, B, and D describe tools for the *Government's benefit* (minimizing criticism, speeding up, strengthening the leader). Option C describes a tool for the *People's benefit* (holding the govt responsible). In a democracy, the 'underlying principle' is always about the People, not the convenience of the Ruler.
Mains GS-II (Polity): This links directly to the 'Stability vs. Accountability' debate. The Presidential system offers Stability (Option B/D logic), while the Parliamentary system ensures Accountability (Option C). Use this trade-off to critique proposals for switching India to a Presidential system.