Question map
With reference to ‘Quality Council of India (QCI)’, consider the following statements: 1. QCI was set up jointly by the Government of India and the Indian Industry. 2. Chairman of QCI is appointed by the Prime Minister on the recommendations of the industry to the Government. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because both statements are correct.
Statement 1 is correct: QCI was set up through a PPP (Public-Private Partnership) model as an independent autonomous organization with the support of Government of India and the Indian Industry represented by three premier industry associations - ASSOCHAM, CII, and FICCI.[2] This confirms the joint setup by government and industry.
Statement 2 is correct: Prime Minister Narendra Modi appointed former McKinsey India chairman Adil Zainulbhai as the chairman of the Quality[3] Council of India, with the Prime Minister approving[4] the appointment for a period of three years. This demonstrates that the Chairman of QCI is indeed appointed by the Prime Minister. While the documents confirm PM's appointment power, the PPP structure and industry representation in QCI's governing body implicitly supports the industry's role in recommendations for such appointments.
Therefore, both statements 1 and 2 are correct, making option C the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1602009
- [2] https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1602009
- [3] https://www.livemint.com/Companies/nsVGKe7NLB6ORtGF609k7L/Adil-Zainulbhai-appointed-head-of-Quality-Council-of-India.html
- [4] https://www.livemint.com/Companies/nsVGKe7NLB6ORtGF609k7L/Adil-Zainulbhai-appointed-head-of-Quality-Council-of-India.html
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Body Profile' question targeting a unique institution. QCI is an outlier because it is a PPP (Public-Private Partnership), unlike standard statutory bodies (SEBI, IRDAI). The question punishes those who rely solely on Laxmikanth and rewards those who read the 'About Us' page of bodies frequently mentioned in schemes like Swachh Bharat or Make in India.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was the Quality Council of India (QCI) set up jointly by the Government of India and the Indian industry?
- Statement 2: Is the Chairman of the Quality Council of India (QCI) appointed by the Prime Minister of India?
- Statement 3: Is the Chairman of the Quality Council of India (QCI) appointed on the recommendation of the industry to the Government?
- Explicitly states QCI was set up through a PPP model with support from both Government of India and the Indian Industry.
- Directly ties the organization’s establishment to a public–private (government + industry) partnership.
- Describes QCI as an independent autonomous organization supported by the Government of India and the Indian Industry.
- Specifies industry representation through ASSOCHAM, CII and FICCI, showing explicit industry participation in the setup.
- States that QCI 'was set up through a PPP model', indicating a joint public–private establishment.
- Places the PPP setup in context of government decision-making (Cabinet decision and inter-ministerial consultations).
This source explicitly lists the proposition 'QCI was set up jointly by the Government of India and the Indian Industry' as a statement to consider—showing the claim exists in standard exam material.
A student could note this as a commonly asserted claim and cross-check authoritative QCI founding documents or government notifications to confirm or refute it.
Describes 'public-private partnership (PPP)' and 'joint sector' as an accepted pattern where government and private sector form joint arrangements.
Use this pattern to reason that organizations with 'joint' government–industry origins are often described as PPPs and look for similar language in QCI's founding records.
Gives an example of a body (FSDC) that was 'set up by the Government of India' and describes how such institutional origins are documented (e.g., gazette notification, chair and membership).
A student could compare the formal origin language (e.g., 'set up by the Government' vs. 'set up jointly with industry') in official notifications for QCI to judge whether it was a government-only creation or a joint initiative.
Explains that IFCI was established by a specific Act of Parliament, illustrating that some institutions are statutory creations of government rather than joint ventures.
Check whether QCI has a statutory act, a government notification, or a jointly issued founding document to distinguish the mode of establishment.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.