Question map
Right to vote and to be elected in India is a
Explanation
The right to vote in elections is an important constitutional right.[1] While the right to vote is neither a fundamental right nor a common law right but is pure and simple,[2] a statutory right, it is also recognized as a constitutional right because this right is explicitly granted and protected by the Constitution of India, primarily under Article 326.[3] The Constitution provides many more rights, which may not be Fundamental Rights. For example, the right to property is not a Fundamental Right but it is a constitutional right.[1] Similarly, the right to vote falls into this category—it is derived from constitutional provisions (Article 326) and operationalized through statutory law (Section 62 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951). Therefore, option C is correct as it best captures the nature of voting rights in India as constitutional rights that are not fundamental rights but are enshrined in the Constitution itself.
Sources- [1] Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS > 5.4 EXPANDING SCOPE OF RIGHTS > p. 87
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question is a classic 'NCERT vs. Case Law' trap. While the Supreme Court has often termed the right to vote as a 'statutory right' (derived from RPA 1951), the NCERT Class XI Political Science textbook explicitly labels it a 'Constitutional Right'. In UPSC Prelims, the NCERT text overrides complex judicial nuances.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the right to vote and to be elected in India a Fundamental Right under the Indian Constitution?
- Statement 2: Is the right to vote and to be elected in India a Natural Right according to Indian law or constitutional doctrine?
- Statement 3: Is the right to vote and to be elected in India a Constitutional Right under the Indian Constitution?
- Statement 4: Is the right to vote and to be elected in India a Legal Right created and enforceable by ordinary statute law?
- Explicitly states the right to vote is not a fundamental right but a statutory right.
- Specifically says the right to be elected is likewise statutory, directly addressing both parts of the question.
- Reports the Supreme Court characterization that the 'right to vote' is a statutory right under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
- Distinguishes 'right to vote' (statutory) from 'freedom of voting' (as expression under Article 19), reinforcing that voting itself was not placed on par with fundamental rights.
Lists the specific rights contained in Part III (Fundamental Rights) — a bounded catalogue that does not include voting or candidature.
A student could check whether the right to vote/contest appears in Part III; if not, that suggests it is not a Fundamental Right.
Explicitly notes elections to Lok Sabha/State Assemblies are on adult suffrage under Article 326 in Part XV and distinguishes such rights as different from Fundamental Rights.
A student could verify the location of Article 326 (Part XV) and note that being placed outside Part III implies a different legal status than Fundamental Rights.
States that the right to vote is an important 'constitutional right' and gives example of a right that is constitutional but not Fundamental (right to property).
A student can use this pattern (constitutional vs Fundamental) to infer that being labeled a 'constitutional right' suggests it may not be a Fundamental Right.
Explains the key practical distinction: Fundamental Rights in Part III have a special remedy (direct access to Supreme Court under Article 32) which is not available for rights in other Parts.
A student could check whether violations of voting rights are enforceable directly under Article 32 — absence would support that voting is not a Fundamental Right.
Describes that the Constitution guarantees universal adult franchise and answers who can vote/contest, indicating these are constitutional provisions rather than listing them among Part III rights.
A student could locate the constitutional provisions guaranteeing franchise/contest (e.g., Articles on franchise) and note their placement to judge whether they are in Part III.
- Explicitly states the right to vote is a constitutional right under Article 326.
- Ties the franchise to the Constitution (not to a 'natural right' doctrine).
- States the right to vote and to be elected is neither a fundamental nor a common law right.
- Describes it as 'pure and simple, a statutory right', supporting that it is not a natural right.
- Explains that rights mentioned in the Constitution but not under Fundamental Rights are 'constitutional rights'.
- Specifically says the right to vote is mentioned under Article 326 and 'is said to be a Constitutional Right.'
Explicitly states that the right to vote is an important constitutional right and distinguishes it from Fundamental Rights.
A student can check whether the right to vote is enumerated in Part III (Fundamental Rights) or elsewhere in the Constitution (e.g., Article references) to see if it is a constitutional/legal right rather than a Fundamental or 'natural' right.
Defines the category 'rights outside Part III' as constitutional/legal rights and lists examples, establishing that some rights are constitutional but not Fundamental Rights.
Use this rule to classify the right to vote: if voting is provided outside Part III, it would be a constitutional (non-fundamental) right rather than a Fundamental/Natural Right.
Says the Constitution guarantees every adult citizen the right to vote (universal adult franchise), showing the right is constitutionally provided.
Combine this with knowledge of where constitutional guarantees are placed (Part III vs other parts) or with the text of relevant Articles to judge the legal/constitutional status versus a 'natural' right.
Explains universal adult franchise is a feature of the Constitution, stating every adult citizen has the right to vote irrespective of personal attributes.
A student could examine whether this constitutional guarantee is implemented by statute or by Part III protections to infer whether the right is treated as a constitutional/legal right rather than a natural right.
Presents a multiple-choice framing that lists possible classifications (Fundamental, Natural, Constitutional, Legal) for the right to vote, indicating this is a categorized legal question in study materials.
Use this taxonomy as a checklist to compare textual/source-based evidence (Constitution provisions, Part III presence, judicial decisions) to eliminate 'natural right' if sources classify it as constitutional/legal.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Explicitly states 'The right to vote in elections is an important constitutional right.'
- Distinguishes constitutional rights from fundamental rights, implying voting is within constitutional provisions.
- Says the Constitution 'guarantee[s] every adult citizen in India, the right to vote.'
- Frames universal adult franchise as a constitutional decision by the framers.
- States that 'All citizens have the right to stand for election and become the representative of the people.'
- Links the right to contest elections to the Constitution's broad democratic principles.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- Explicitly states the 'right to vote' is a statutory right conferred by a provision of the Representation of the People Act (i.e., created by statute).
- Distinguishes the statutory 'right to vote' from other constitutional/fundamental rights (shows enforceability is subject to statutory limits).
- States directly that the right to vote and the right to be elected are 'pure and simple, a statutory right.'
- Specifically groups the right to be elected with the right to vote as statutory (i.e., created and governed by statute).
States that Article 326 entitles every citizen of India aged 18+ to vote, but also that disqualifications can be by Constitution or 'any law made by the appropriate Legislature'.
A student could combine this with knowledge of the Constitution to infer that the right is constitutionally recognized but subject to statutory regulation and disqualification by ordinary laws.
Explains Article 329 bars ordinary courts from jurisdiction over election disputes and requires election petitions 'as provided for by law'.
One could deduce that enforcement mechanisms are provided by special statutory procedure rather than standard judicial remedies, affecting whether it's an ordinary legal right enforceable in courts.
Notes elections are on basis of adult suffrage (Article 326) and distinguishes these electoral rights from Fundamental Rights, stating aggrieved persons cannot use Article 32 remedy.
This suggests electoral rights are constitutionally placed outside Part III remedies, so a student might infer they are not fundamental rights and their enforceability differs from other constitutional rights.
Says the Constitution 'guarantee[s] every adult citizen in India, the right to vote' and frames both 'Who are the voters? Who can contest?' as constitutional questions.
Combine with Article references to conclude the right is constitutionally guaranteed in form, though further rules on exercise may be in statute.
Identifies the Election Commission as a Constitutional body that conducts elections.
A student could infer that administration and rules of elections are implemented by constitutional institutions and statutory rules, not solely by ordinary private-law remedies.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements. Unlock full statement-level provenance with ExamRobot Pro.
- [THE VERDICT]: Controversial Sitter. Directly lifted from NCERT Class XI, 'Indian Constitution at Work', Chapter 3 (Election and Representation), Page 66-67.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The hierarchy of Rights: Fundamental (Part III) > Constitutional (Other Parts) > Statutory (Acts of Parliament) > Customary/Natural.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the status of these specific rights: 1. Right to Property (Art 300A) → Constitutional/Legal (Not Fundamental). 2. Right to Vote (Art 326) → Constitutional. 3. Right to Privacy (Puttaswamy Judgment) → Fundamental (Art 21). 4. Right to Information → Statutory (RTI Act) but flows from Fundamental (Art 19). 5. No Tax without Law (Art 265) → Constitutional.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Always check the 'Source Document'. If the Constitution explicitly mentions the right (e.g., Art 326 says 'elections shall be on the basis of adult suffrage'), it is a Constitutional Right first. Do not downgrade it to a 'Legal Right' unless 'Constitutional Right' is not an option.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance. Available with ExamRobot Pro.
Several references distinguish rights guaranteed in Part III (Fundamental Rights) from other constitutional rights and note different remedies.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often probe the classification of rights and remedies (e.g., Article 32). Mastering this helps answer whether a right is 'Fundamental' or only a 'constitutional' right and explains available enforcement mechanisms. Connects to topics on Part III, Article 32, and justiciability.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > Exceptions to Funda· mental Rights. > p. 96
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 8: Fundamental Rights > RIGHTS OUTSIDE PART III > p. 106
References state elections to Lok Sabha and State Assemblies are on the basis of adult suffrage and reference Article 326.
High-yield: knowing that universal adult franchise is provided by the Constitution (Article 326) clarifies the source and classification of voting rights. This links to electoral law, constitutional provisions on representation, and comparative questions on franchise in other democracies.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 8: Fundamental Rights > RIGHTS OUTSIDE PART III > p. 106
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION > Universal franchise and right to contest > p. 66
Evidence notes the Constitution guarantees who can contest elections and that 'right to contest' accompanies the right to vote as a constitutional provision.
Useful for UPSC: distinguishes voting rights from eligibility-to-contest rules, and aids answers on electoral qualifications, equality principles, and related constitutional limits. Helps handle questions on candidacy, disqualification, and representational rights.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION > Universal franchise and right to contest > p. 67
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION > Universal franchise and right to contest > p. 66
Several references distinguish Fundamental Rights (Part III) from other rights described as constitutional or legal rights, which is central to whether electoral rights are 'natural' or constitutional.
High yield for UPSC as questions often probe the nature and source of rights (Part III v/s other parts). Mastering this helps answer comparisons (fundamental v/s statutory/constitutional rights), constitutional interpretation questions, and cases on enforceability and remedies. Link this with Part III, rights outside Part III and judicial review.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 8: Fundamental Rights > RIGHTS OUTSIDE PART III > p. 106
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > p. 92
References state that the Constitution guarantees universal adult franchise and makes every adult citizen eligible to vote.
Core concept for polity papers and GS mains—explains the source and extent of electoral rights, constitutional design, and egalitarian principles. Helps answer questions on electoral reforms, franchise principles, and comparative franchise histories.
- Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: Universal Franchise and India’s Electoral System > Universal Adult Franchise > p. 118
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION > Universal franchise and right to contest > p. 66
Sources assert that the right to stand for election and the right to vote are rights conferred/recognised by the Constitution rather than labelled as natural rights.
Useful for answering direct questions on electoral rights' legal status, for essay/ethics and prelims. Connects to topics on representation, eligibility, and distinctions between constitutional rights and fundamental rights.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION > Universal franchise and right to contest > p. 67
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS > 5.4 EXPANDING SCOPE OF RIGHTS > p. 87
The references repeatedly state that the Constitution adopts and guarantees universal adult franchise (every adult citizen's right to vote).
High-yield: explains the constitutional basis for voting rights, connects to amendments (voting age change) and electoral law topics; useful for questions on franchise, constitutional guarantees, and electoral reforms.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 4: Salient Features of the Constitution > IfJ I Universal Adult Franchise > p. 32
- Exploring Society:India and Beyond ,Social Science, Class VIII . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: Universal Franchise and India’s Electoral System > Universal Adult Franchise > p. 118
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts. Unlock micro-concepts with ExamRobot Pro.
The 'Right to Trade' (Article 301) is a Constitutional Right, whereas the 'Freedom to practice any profession' (Article 19(1)(g)) is a Fundamental Right. A violation of Art 301 cannot be challenged under Art 32 (Writ jurisdiction of SC), but only under Art 226 (High Court).
Use the 'Hierarchy of Law' heuristic.
Option A (Fundamental): Is it in Part III? No. Eliminate.
Option B (Natural): Too vague/philosophical for Indian Polity. Eliminate.
Conflict: Option C (Constitutional) vs Option D (Legal).
Logic: Does an Article exist? Yes (Art 326). The Constitution is superior to ordinary Law. Therefore, C > D.
Links to GS-2 (RPA 1951 & Electoral Reforms). The distinction is crucial for 'Prisoner Voting Rights'. Since voting is a statutory/constitutional right (not Fundamental), the Supreme Court has upheld Section 62(5) of RPA 1951 which bans prisoners from voting. If it were a Fundamental Right, this ban might have been struck down.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault. Unlock the Mentor's Vault with ExamRobot Pro.