Question map
Increase in absolute and per capita real GNP do not connote a higher level of economic development, if
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because economic growth takes into account only quantitative changes (like increase in per capita income), while economic development takes into account both quantitative and qualitative aspects of improvement in well-being[1]. Economic development is a broader concept where Development = Growth + improvements in different socio-economic parameters[1]. If GNP increases but poverty and unemployment also increase, it indicates that the benefits of growth are not translating into broader well-being improvements. Even countries having high economic growth experienced speedy rise in poverty because of its unequal distribution[2]. This scenario represents "growth without development" where quantitative gains fail to reflect qualitative improvements in people's lives. The other options—relating to sectoral output imbalances or trade patterns—do not directly negate development in the same fundamental way that rising poverty and unemployment do, as these latter conditions directly contradict the core objective of improving human welfare.
Sources- [1] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 2: Economic Growth versus Economic Development > ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT > p. 22
- [2] INDIA PEOPLE AND ECONOMY, TEXTBOOK IN GEOGRAPHY FOR CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 6: Planning and Sustainable Development in Indian Context > Sustainable Development > p. 70
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Concept 101' question found in the first chapter of any standard Economy book (NCERT or Singhania). It tests the fundamental philosophical difference between 'Growth' (numbers) and 'Development' (people). If you missed this, you are skipping the definitions to memorize data, which is a fatal error.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does an increase in absolute and per capita real GNP fail to connote a higher level of economic development if industrial output fails to keep pace with agricultural output?
- Statement 2: Does an increase in absolute and per capita real GNP fail to connote a higher level of economic development if agricultural output fails to keep pace with industrial output?
- Statement 3: Does an increase in absolute and per capita real GNP fail to connote a higher level of economic development if poverty and unemployment increase?
- Statement 4: Does an increase in absolute and per capita real GNP fail to connote a higher level of economic development if imports grow faster than exports?
- Explicitly distinguishes economic growth (quantitative increase such as per capita income/GNP) from economic development (requires qualitative improvements in well-being).
- Implied conclusion: higher GNP alone may not indicate development because development includes broader socio-economic parameters beyond income.
- Lewis model emphasizes shifting surplus labour from agriculture to industry as key to development; industrial expansion is thus necessary for structural transformation.
- If industrial output fails to expand, the necessary labour absorption and productivity gains tied to development do not occur.
- Defines underdevelopment features: large primary-sector employment and low per capita income, linking an agriculture-dominated structure to low development.
- Suggests that without a relative rise in industrial activity, high GNP figures may coexist with underdevelopment characteristics.
- Explicitly distinguishes economic growth (quantitative measures like GNP/GDP) from economic development (qualitative improvements in well‑being), implying GNP rise alone may not mean development.
- Frames development as growth plus socio‑economic improvements — so sectoral imbalance (industry up, agriculture lagging) can prevent broader development despite higher GNP.
- Stresses agriculture as central to long‑term economic development and links agro‑sector performance to the overall success of development.
- Implied that if agriculture 'goes wrong' development is jeopardised — supporting the idea that lagging agricultural output can negate GNP gains.
- Shows large share of labour employed in agriculture but contributing disproportionately less to GDP, indicating a productivity/employment mismatch.
- Implying that industrial growth raising GNP while agriculture lags may not improve real incomes or welfare for the large rural workforce.
- Explicitly notes that post‑WWII reliance on GNP/per‑capita as development measures failed because high growth sometimes coincided with rising poverty due to unequal distribution.
- Uses this historical lesson to argue development must include redistribution, equity and non‑economic dimensions beyond aggregate GNP.
- Distinguishes economic growth (quantitative increase in per‑capita income/GNP) from economic development (growth plus qualitative socio‑economic improvements).
- Implies that rising GNP alone does not equal development unless well‑being and other socio‑economic parameters improve.
- Defines 'jobless growth' where GDP rises without a perceptible increase in employment, producing chronic unemployment despite higher GDP.
- Directly supports the possibility that higher GNP can coexist with rising unemployment, undermining its claim as evidence of development.
- Explicitly distinguishes economic growth (quantitative GNP/per capita increases) from economic development (qualitative, broader measures).
- Implies that higher GNP/per capita alone is insufficient to claim development, so GNP rises may not connote development by themselves.
- Explains that income increases tend to raise spending on imports and that imports can grow faster than exports as income rises.
- Identifies a macro effect (currency depreciation) when imports outpace exports, signaling adverse external sector consequences despite higher income.
- Shows in the open-economy national income identity that exports increase aggregate demand while imports are an autonomous leakage.
- Implicates that faster import growth relative to exports reduces net demand and can offset the beneficial impact of higher GNP on domestic output.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Directly solvable from NCERT Class XII (India People & Economy, Ch 6) or Chapter 2 of Nitin Singhania.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The distinction between 'Economic Growth' (Quantitative: GDP/GNP) and 'Economic Development' (Qualitative: HDI, Poverty, Inequality).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the critiques of GDP: 1) Jobless Growth (Growth without employment), 2) Kuznets Curve (Inequality initially rises with growth), 3) Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach, 4) Components of PQLI vs HDI, 5) Green GNP (Environmental cost deduction).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Don't just memorize formulas for GDP/GNP. Always prepare the 'Limitations' of every major indicator. UPSC loves asking 'What does this metric hide?' (e.g., GDP hides unpaid care work, pollution, and inequality).
The statement contrasts higher GNP (growth) with the broader concept of development; reference [6] explicitly makes this distinction.
High-yield for UPSC: many questions probe the limits of GDP/GNP as welfare indicators. Mastering this helps answer questions on measurement, policy priorities, and development indicators; it links to topics on human development, poverty, and inclusive growth.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 2: Economic Growth versus Economic Development > ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT > p. 22
The statement hinges on industry failing to keep pace with agriculture; reference [7] (Lewis model) explains why industrial expansion is central to development.
Crucial for understanding development processes and employment dynamics. Helps in answering questions on sectoral composition, labour absorption, and policy measures for industrialisation and rural development. Connects to economic history and policy debates on industrial policy.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 20: Investment Models > Lewis Model of Economic Development > p. 593
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 2: Economic Growth versus Economic Development > UNDERDEVELOPMENT > p. 23
Rising agricultural output does not automatically translate into better welfare or development; references [3]–[4] note output-price/income disconnect and low per-worker productivity in agriculture.
Important for questions on rural distress, farm incomes, and why GDP gains may not reflect improved living standards. It links to agrarian policy, price-support mechanisms, and rural employment strategies.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 10: Agriculture - Part I > 10.15 Doubling Farmers' Income > p. 324
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 10: Agriculture - Part I > 10.15 Doubling Farmers' Income > p. 323
The core question hinges on the difference between higher GNP (growth) and wider improvements in well‑being (development), directly discussed in the references.
High‑yield for UPSC: many questions test whether GDP/GNP growth equates to development. Mastering this helps answer policy evaluation questions and link macro indicators to social outcomes; connects to topics on human development, poverty, and sectoral policies.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 2: Economic Growth versus Economic Development > ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT > p. 22
References emphasise that agriculture is foundational to development and that its failure can undermine overall progress despite industrial gains.
High relevance for economy and GS papers: questions on balanced growth, rural distress, and agricultural policy rely on this concept. Understanding agriculture–industry linkages aids analysis of structural transformation and policy tradeoffs.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > Agriculture > p. 1
Evidence shows large agricultural employment with low per‑worker productivity; industrial‑led GNP growth may not raise rural incomes if this mismatch persists.
Important for answering questions on inclusive growth, labour migration, and structural change. Helps frame why aggregate indicators can mask welfare deficits and guides discussion of labour reallocation and rural development measures.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 10: Agriculture - Part I > 10.15 Doubling Farmers' Income > p. 324
Reference [7] explicitly differentiates growth (quantitative GNP/per‑capita rise) from development (growth plus qualitative socio‑economic improvements).
High‑yield for UPSC: many questions test the difference between growth and development, indicators used, and policy implications. Mastering this helps answer questions on measurement, human development indices, and policy priorities across economy and social sectors.
- Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 2: Economic Growth versus Economic Development > ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT > p. 22
The 'Gini Coefficient' and 'Lorenz Curve'. Since this question tested the disconnect between Income and Welfare, the next logical step is the mathematical measurement of that disconnect (Inequality). Also, watch out for the 'Misery Index' (Inflation + Unemployment rate).
Use the 'People vs. Accountants' heuristic. Options A, B, and D describe structural or trade imbalances (Accountant problems). Option C describes human suffering (Poverty/Unemployment). 'Development' is a human-centric term. Therefore, the option that directly hurts humans negates development most strongly.
Links to GS-3 (Internal Security): The disconnect between High GDP and Low Development is the root cause of Left-Wing Extremism (Naxalism) in resource-rich states like Chhattisgarh (High GSDP growth from mining, but low HDI).