Question map
With reference to organic farming in India, consider the following statements : 1. 'The National Programme for Organic Production' (NPOP) is operated under the guidelines and directions of the Union Ministry of Rural Development. 2. 'The Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority' (APEDA) functions as the Secretariat for the implementation of NPOP. 3. Sikkim has become India's first fully organic State. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (statements 2 and 3 only).
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** The National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) is operated under the overall guidance and directions of the Department of Commerce, Government of India[1], not the Union Ministry of Rural Development.
**Statement 2 is correct:** The National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) was launched in 2001 by the Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Govt of India for exports of Organic products and APEDA acts as the Secretariat for the implementation of the NPOP[2].
**Statement 3 is correct:** Sikkim implemented organic practices in around 75,000 hectares of agricultural land as per the guidelines of NPOP and became India's first fully organic State in 2015[3]. This makes Sikkim a pioneering example of state-level organic transition in India.
Therefore, only statements 2 and 3 are correct, making option B the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/org_farm/pdf/NPOP%208th%20Edition%20.pdf
- [2] https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2148991
- [3] Indian Economy, Nitin Singhania .(ed 2nd 2021-22) > Chapter 9: Agriculture > Importance: > p. 311
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Ministry Swap' trap. The examiner relies on the intuition that 'Organic Farming' must belong to the Ministry of Agriculture or Rural Development. However, since NPOP is primarily an export-standard mechanism, it falls under Commerce. Recognizing this administrative nuance was the key to cracking the question.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) in India operated under the guidelines and directions of the Union Ministry of Rural Development?
- Statement 2: Does the Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) serve as the Secretariat for implementing the National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP) in India?
- Statement 3: Has Sikkim been officially declared India's first fully organic state in the context of organic farming in India?
- Directly states which ministry provides overall guidance for NPOP.
- Names the Department of Commerce, not the Ministry of Rural Development, as the apex authority.
- Confirms the programme was launched by the Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce & Industry.
- Identifies APEDA as the Secretariat for NPOP implementation under the Department of Commerce.
- Official NPOP document header associates the programme with the Ministry of Commerce & Industry and Department of Commerce.
- Supports that NPOP is a Department of Commerce/Ministry of Commerce & Industry initiative rather than Ministry of Rural Development.
Explicitly states NPOP is a third-party certification programme run by the Ministry of Commerce and Industries since 2001 — gives a direct alternative institutional home.
A student could check official ministry responsibilities (Commerce & Industry vs Rural Development) or APEDA's parent ministry to judge the plausibility of the Rural Development claim.
Says NPOP is implemented by APEDA 'as per the guidelines of Ministry of Commerce & Industry' when listing certification systems — reinforces Commerce & Industry linkage.
Combine this with knowledge that APEDA is under Commerce & Industry to infer which ministry issues operational guidelines for NPOP.
Presents the assertion (that NPOP is operated under Ministry of Rural Development) as an exam statement to be evaluated, showing it is a claim under scrutiny.
Use this to motivate cross-checking authoritative sources (e.g., APEDA, ministry websites) rather than accepting the claim.
Repeats the same multiple-choice formulation including the Rural Development claim and the APEDA-as-secretariat claim, indicating these are common, testable assertions.
A student could use the repeated exam framing to prioritize verifying which ministry actually oversees/frames NPOP rules (Commerce vs Rural Development).
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.