Question map
Which of the following are regarded as the main features of the "Rule of Law" ? 1. Limitation of powers 2. Equality before law 3. People's responsibility to the Government 4. Liberty and civil rights Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is option C (1, 2 and 4 only). Rule of law means government according to rule as opposed to arbitrary government; it means government limited by the terms of a constitution[1], which establishes **limitation of powers** (statement 1). A.V. Dicey's doctrine of rule of law includes absence of arbitrary power (no man can be punished except for a breach of law) and equality before the law (equal subjection of all citizens to the ordinary law of the land)[2], confirming **equality before law** (statement 2). Rule of law is identified as one of the eight elements of constitutionalism along with respect for individual rights[3], supporting **liberty and civil rights** (statement 4). However, "people's responsibility to the government" (statement 3) is not a feature of rule of law. Rather, rule of law emphasizes the government's accountability to law and people, not the reverse. Rule of law is the foundation of any democracy, meaning that no person is above the law[4], which implies governmental responsibility to citizens, not citizen responsibility to government.
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 3: Concept of the Constitution > II Definition > p. 25
- [2] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 92: World Constitutions > T BRITISH CONSTITUTION > p. 678
- [3] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 3: Concept of the Constitution > El l Elements > p. 26
- [4] Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS > Right to Equality > p. 79
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Conceptual Definition' question. It filters candidates who understand the *philosophy* of the Constitution (Constitutionalism) from those who merely memorize articles. The key is realizing that 'Rule of Law' is a mechanism to constrain the State, not a tool to enforce obedience from citizens.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is "limitation of powers" regarded as a main feature of the "Rule of Law"?
- Statement 2: Is "equality before law" regarded as a main feature of the "Rule of Law"?
- Statement 3: Is "people's responsibility to the government" regarded as a main feature of the "Rule of Law"?
- Statement 4: Are "liberty and civil rights" regarded as main features of the "Rule of Law"?
- Provides an explicit definition linking 'Rule of Law' to government being limited by a constitution (i.e., limitation of power).
- Frames 'government limited by rules' as the contrast to arbitrary government, directly tying limitation to the concept.
- Describes the Constitution's balancing act that empowers judiciary to declare laws unconstitutional, showing a practical mechanism that limits legislative power under Rule of Law.
- Contrasts Parliamentary supremacy with judicial review, implying Rule of Law involves checks on legislative authority.
- Calls judicial power 'sentinels of Rule of Law', indicating judiciary's role in restraining other organs.
- Mentions the harmonisation between judicial review and parliamentary supremacy, implying limitation of powers is central to Rule of Law.
- Explicitly states equality before law is a corollary of Diceyβs concept of the Rule of Law.
- Describes equality before law as correlative to and necessary for the rule of law (no one above the law).
- Cites A.V. Diceyβs three implications of the doctrine of Rule of Law, listing 'Equality before the law' as one implication.
- Frames equality before law as a fundamental characteristic of the British constitutional system under the rule of law.
- Equates the constitutional guarantee of equality before the law with the idea of the 'rule of law'.
- States plainly that 'no person is above the law', linking equality before law to the foundation of democracy/rule of law.
- Explicitly states that laws apply equally to all and that no person is above the law β implying citizens are subject to legal obligations.
- Defines 'rule of law' as the foundation of democracy and emphasises equal subjection of every citizen to the law.
- Dicey's formulation includes 'equality before the law' β described as equal subjection of all citizens to ordinary law.
- States government must act according to law and within legal limits, which frames reciprocal obligations between law and those governed.
- Explains rule of law as administration carried out in obedience to laws that clearly define rights, privileges and obligations of subjects.
- Connects the concept historically to defining citizens' obligations to the legal order rather than arbitrary rule.
- Explicitly treats 'Rule of Law' as a basic feature of the Constitution and connects it to fundamental rights (liberty/privacy) derived under Article 21.
- Links judicial recognition of personal liberty and related rights to the constitutional framework in which Rule of Law operates.
- Lists 'Rule of law' and 'Respect for individual rights' together as core elements of constitutionalism (Henkin's elements).
- Directly associates individual rights with the principles that underpin the Rule of Law.
- Cites A.V. Dicey's concept where 'equality before law' (a civil-rights idea) is identified as an element of the Rule of Law.
- Shows classical jurisprudential linkage between rights/equality and the Rule of Law.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter for conceptual learners; Trap for casual readers. Source: Laxmikanth (Chapter on Fundamental Rights/Rule of Law) or NCERT Class XI (Political Theory).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The concept of 'Constitutionalism' and Article 14. Whenever you read 'Rule of Law', immediately recall A.V. Dicey's three principles.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize Dicey's 3 tenets: (1) Absence of Arbitrary Power, (2) Equality before Law, (3) Predominance of Legal Spirit. Contrast 'Rule of Law' (UK) vs 'Due Process of Law' (USA) vs 'Procedure Established by Law' (India/Japan). Understand 'Lex Rex' (Law is King) vs 'Rex Lex' (King is Law).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Always check the 'Direction of Accountability'. In Constitutionalism, the arrow points from the Government to the Law. Statement 3 reverses this (People -> Government), which is a feature of authoritarianism, not Rule of Law.
Reference [8] defines Rule of Law as government limited by constitutional rules rather than arbitrary rulers, directly tying limitation of powers to the concept.
High-yield for UPSC: clarifies a core constitutional theory tested in polity questions. Connects to topics on constitutionalism, separation of powers, and Article 14. Useful for answering questions on rule of law, judicial review, and limits on state power.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 3: Concept of the Constitution > II Definition > p. 25
References [1] and [7] describe judiciary declaring laws unconstitutional and acting as 'sentinels' of Rule of Law, showing how limitation operates in practice.
Important for UPSC answers on checks and balances and the role of judiciary; links doctrine to case-law and institutional functions. Helps frame questions on judicial activism, separation of powers, and constitutional remedies.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 4: OUTSTANDING FEATURES OF OUR CONSTITUTION > OUTSTANDING FEATURES OF OUR CONSTITUTION > p. 44
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 4: OUTSTANDING FEATURES OF OUR CONSTITUTION > OUTSTANDING FEATURES OF OUR CONSTITUTION > p. 45
References about basic structure and limited amending power (e.g., [3],[4],[5],[10]) show constitutional limits on Parliament, reinforcing that limitation of powers is embedded in the constitutional framework tied to Rule of Law.
Crucial for UPSC because the basic-structure doctrine is repeatedly examined in polity; connects amendment procedure, judicial review, and protection of fundamental features. Enables answers on constitutional amendments, parliamentary limits, and the durability of Rule of Law.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 10: Procedure for Amendment > p. 197
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 12: Basic Structure of the Constitution > EMERGENCE OF THE BASIC STRUCTURE > p. 128
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 12: Basic Structure of the Constitution > EMERGENCE OF THE BASIC STRUCTURE > p. 128
Multiple references cite Dicey and list equality before the law as one of Diceyβs core implications of the Rule of Law.
High-yield for UPSC: explains a foundational doctrine used in constitutional law questions (rule of law, judicial review, basic structure). Knowing Diceyβs implications lets candidates connect historical doctrine to Indian constitutional interpretation and judicial pronouncements.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 92: World Constitutions > T BRITISH CONSTITUTION > p. 678
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > p. 101
References explain Article 14βs twofold phrasing and note the different origins and meanings of the two halves.
Crucial for questions on fundamental rights and constitutional interpretation: distinguishes formal equality from positive protection, links to case law and amendment/basic structure debates, and helps answer questions on scope and exceptions to Article 14.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 8: Fundamental Rights > II Equality before Law and Equal Protection of Laws > p. 77
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > p. 100
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > p. 102
Sources contrast 'equality before law' (formal equality) with 'equal protection' and substantive/distributive justice requiring affirmative action.
Important for UPSC essays and mains answers on social justice, reservations, and public policy: shows how legal equality may be insufficient and why affirmative measures are constitutionally recognised.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > p. 102
- Political Theory, Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 3: Equality > Equality Through Differential Treatment > p. 45
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 8: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES > p. 100
Several references (Dicey and NCERT) emphasise that rule of law means all persons are equally subject to the law β a core idea underlying citizens' duties under law.
High-yield for polity questions: appears in definitions of rule of law, constitutional provisions, and judicial review debates. Mastering this clarifies distinctions between rule of law, equality, and legal accountability and enables answers on citizens' rights vs. obligations and Diceyan doctrine.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 92: World Constitutions > T BRITISH CONSTITUTION > p. 678
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 5: DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS > Right to Equality > p. 79
Laxmikanth explicitly notes that Dicey's third principle ('Constitution is the result of the ordinary law of the land') does NOT apply to India. In India, the Constitution is the *source* of individual rights, not the result of them. A future question will test this specific distinction.
Use the 'Anti-Authoritarian' filter. Rule of Law is a liberal democratic concept. Statement 3 ('People's responsibility to the Government') implies blind obedience or a regimented state. In a democracy, the government is responsible to the people, not vice versa. If Statement 3 feels 'dictatorial', eliminate it. This removes options A and D immediately.
Link this to GS-2 (Governance) and GS-4 (Ethics). In Ethics, distinguish between 'Rule of Law' (Justice/Fairness) and 'Rule by Law' (using law as a tool of oppression, e.g., Apartheid or Colonial India).